i have tried several things to get an imap deamon to run on the
Panther build to no avail. The issues seems to be based on an
authentication method that has changed.
I would like to know if anyone on this list has had success in
getting any imap deamon to actually authenticate users on Panther
I had an error in building doxygen-1.3.2-1. A snippet of its out is
attached.
My Fink version:
Package manager version: 0.13.3
Distribution version: 0.5.3.cvs
I'm running 10.2.6 on PowerBook G4, 867MHz. I don't have the recent
Developer Tools update installed.
Thanks,
Kow
Hi,
I was trying to update scipy-py22 when I got the following error:
curl -f -L -O http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/~jsw/fink/scipy-20030629.tar.gz
curl: (22) The requested file was not found
### execution of curl failed, exit code 22
Downloading the file scipy-20030629.tar.gz failed.
(1) Give up
(2)
I have seen the files
/sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/g77-3.3-2.info
/sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/g77-3.3-20030714.info
has anybody a wise word of advice about this, in relation with the latest
troubles with g77? Fed
Federico: g77-3.3-20030714 fixes the latest problems with the new
assembler and fortran but including it's own private assembler.
-Jeff
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Federico Carminati wrote:
I have seen the files
/sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/g77-3.3-2.info
Andrea: The URL is fixed in CVS, fink selfupdate-cvs (but you may have
to wait a day for the backup server to update).
The correct URL is
ftp://ftp.cdc.noaa.gov/Public/jsw/fink/scipy-20030629.tar.gz.
-Jeff
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to update scipy-py22
What version of ghostcript do you have, since that's what seems to be
causing the issue? It built on my system with ghostscript 8.
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 02:31 AM, Kow K wrote:
I had an error in building doxygen-1.3.2-1. A snippet of its out is
attached.
My Fink version:
Package
Check out
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#not-found
for the procedure to follow in such cases. However, all you need to do
this time is run fink selfupdate-cvs: the package maintainer has
fixed the problem.
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 06:06 AM, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
Hi,
That dynamic modules are not supported message sounds ominous. Do
you have dlcompat and its splitoffs installed?
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 01:28 AM, Eric Peden wrote:
I'm having some trouble with Evolution. Upon launching it, I get this
error on the terminal:
(Killing old version of
On Wednesday, Jul 16, 2003, at 22:10 Japan, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
What version of ghostcript do you have, since that's what seems to be
causing the issue? It built on my system with ghostscript 8.
I have ghostscript-8.00-3 installed on my machine.
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 02:31
OK. By any chance do you have another version of ghostscript installed
elsewhere, such as in /usr/local ?
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 09:33 AM, Kow KURODA wrote:
On Wednesday, Jul 16, 2003, at 22:10 Japan, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
What version of ghostcript do you have, since that's
On Wednesday, Jul 16, 2003, at 22:52 Japan, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
OK. By any chance do you have another version of ghostscript
installed elsewhere, such as in /usr/local ?
No. My /usr/local directory is relatively clean. Only Python-2.3b2
stuff is installed in there now.
Thanks,
Kow
OK. I was wondering because I've had my PATH get ignored by an
application that used ghostscript.
Since all of the errors appear to involve
/sw/share/ghostscript/8.00/lib/gs_btokn.ps , it may be that the file
has become corrupt. Maybe fink reinstall ghostcript will take care
of it.
On
On Wednesday, Jul 16, 2003, at 23:13 Japan, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
OK. I was wondering because I've had my PATH get ignored by an
application that used ghostscript.
Since all of the errors appear to involve
/sw/share/ghostscript/8.00/lib/gs_btokn.ps , it may be that the file
has become
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Jens Nöckel wrote:
Hi Daniel,
just wanted to report that I finally tried the installation
instructions for
lyx-1.3.2 for X11 and QT2 at http://www.18james.com, and the
menu shortcuts all seem to work fine. I meanwhile did this installation
on 3 different Macs. The good
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 11:52 AM, Kow KURODA wrote:
On Wednesday, Jul 16, 2003, at 23:13 Japan, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
OK. I was wondering because I've had my PATH get ignored by an
application that used ghostscript.
Since all of the errors appear to involve
hello all
i'm doing a 'fink install evolution' from the unstable tree.
after picking some options for dependencies, things compile for a
while. ;-)
well, then i get this message:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I. -I/sw/include -Wall -g -O2 -c
Try this:
sudo ranlib /sw/lib/libintl.a
then try the install again.
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 01:58 PM, Joshua David Horner wrote:
hello all
i'm doing a 'fink install evolution' from the unstable tree.
after picking some options for dependencies, things compile for a
while. ;-)
well,
this is what i get:
[dhcp-127-115:~] super% sudo ranlib /sw/lib/libinitl.a
ranlib: can't open file: /sw/lib/libinitl.a (No such file or directory)
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 02:13 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
Try this:
sudo ranlib /sw/lib/libintl.a
then try the install again.
On
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:19:08AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
That dynamic modules are not supported message sounds ominous. Do
you have dlcompat and its splitoffs installed?
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 01:28 AM, Eric Peden wrote:
I'm having some trouble with Evolution. Upon
i swear i looked that over 5 times before i replied. must need to clean
the contacts.
thanks. i'll start compiling again now.
- josh
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 04:33 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Josh, you mis-typed the line
From: Joshua David Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 06:54 PM, Eric Peden wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:19:08AM -0400, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
That dynamic modules are not supported message sounds ominous. Do
you have dlcompat and its splitoffs installed?
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 01:28 AM, Eric Peden
thank all again for helping earlier, but now, closer to finishing, i
get the following:
-
dpkg: regarding .../xfree86_4.3.0-2_darwin-powerpc.deb containing
xfree86:
system-xfree86 conflicts with x11
xfree86 provides x11 and is to be
What are the results if you run fink list -i xft and fink list -i
xfree86? The answer will determine how things get straightened out.
Alexander K. Hansen
Levitated Dipole Experiment
http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
for the first, i get nothing. and for the second, the proper one is
installed.
[dhcp-127-115:~] super% fink list -i xft
Information about 2645 packages read in 4 seconds.
[dhcp-127-115:~] super% fink list -i xfree86
Information about 2645 packages read in 1 seconds.
i system-xfree86
Ok: this looks like you selected xfree86 by accident instead of
system-xfree86 at one of the prompts. Try installing evolution again,
and make sure to select system-xfree86.
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 09:03 PM, Joshua David Horner wrote:
for the first, i get nothing. and for the second,
below is the result of trying to install again. for some reason, i just
think that fink _thinks_ it needs to install xfree86 because of pango,
but shouldn't it just use the _already installed_ system-xfree86
instead?
-
[dhcp-127-115:~]
That one's in the FAQ:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php#node-exists
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 09:24 PM, Joshua David Horner wrote:
below is the result of trying to install again. for some reason, i
just think that fink _thinks_ it needs to install xfree86 because of
okay. so i did what they recommended (force removing system-xfree86)
and starting the install over again.
but i think i'm going to end up where i started again. i won't know
until it gets to that point though.
i feel that way because it asks to pick one of the following:
(1)
hey all.
i still get the same thing about xfree86 not being able to install due
to conflicting with system-xfree86. but isn't that the whole point?
system-xfree86 (as a placeholder) should let other programs compile
against it with no problems, right?
i'm not really sure where to go from
30 matches
Mail list logo
