Hi,
At 02:23 +0100 on 2011-2-10 Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
> I might agree that this type of thing is a fault of texlive:
> the ultimate sources should be there, even if only
> for the case when someone wants to re-create pfa or pfb
> files using conceivably better algorithms.
> (Similar
On 09 Feb 2011, at 22:13, Stefan Bruda wrote:
> At 15:44 +0100 on 2011-2-9 Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>> On 09 Feb 2011, at 01:16, Stefan Bruda wrote:
>>
>>> dvips: Font eurm10 not found; using cmr10
I might agree that this type of thing is a fault of texlive:
the ultimate sources should be th
Hi,
At 16:46 +0900 on 2011-2-9 Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
>
> I tested your source, but I didn't get such a message
> (mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10)
> during the compile.
>
> $ dvips eurm.dvi
> This is dvips(k) 5.99 Copyright 2010 Radical Eye Software
> (www.radica
Hi,
At 15:44 +0100 on 2011-2-9 Jean-François Mertens wrote:
>
> On 09 Feb 2011, at 01:16, Stefan Bruda wrote:
>
> >kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag
> > 0+456/600 --dpi 456 eurm10
> >mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10.
> >mktexpk
On 09 Feb 2011, at 01:16, Stefan Bruda wrote:
>kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 600 --mag
> 0+456/600 --dpi 456 eurm10
>mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10.
>mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file.
>kpathsea: Appending font crea
I tested your source, but I didn't get such a message
(mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10)
during the compile.
$ dvips eurm.dvi
This is dvips(k) 5.99 Copyright 2010 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2011.02.09:1627' -> eurm.ps
.
[1]
$
Sometimes old ~
Hi,
At 10:57 +0900 on 2011-2-9 Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
>
> For a font substitution: could you make a sample tex file
> that can reproduce the situation, as far as possible with
> requisite minimum commands?
Well, anything that uses eurm10 (between others) will cause a failure.
I believe that t
For a font substitution: could you make a sample tex file
that can reproduce the situation, as far as possible with
requisite minimum commands? For example, Jean's sample file
`tt.tex' reported in
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=117203&aid=3168548&group_id=17203
was very useful
Hi,
Thank you first of all for the quick response.
At 21:54 +0900 on 2011-2-8 Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
>
> I've reported the problem to Mr. Kakuto (patch developer),
> and he has just updated the patch:
> http://w32tex.org/generic/dvipsk-TL2010-fix.diff
> which seems to fix the problem in 64b
I've reported the problem to Mr. Kakuto (patch developer),
and he has just updated the patch:
http://w32tex.org/generic/dvipsk-TL2010-fix.diff
which seems to fix the problem in 64bit.
I will update finkinfo when Fink cvs repository comes back.
Tomoaki Okayama
At Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:19:40 +0900,
The patch `dvipsk-TL2010-fix.diff' seems to cause the problem.
Please try:
$ sudo perl -pi -e "s|(patch -d texlive/texk/dvipsk)|#\1|"
/PREFIX/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/text/texlive.info
$ fink rebuild texlive
If it works, please let us know. I couldn't access the cvs repository
currentl
Hi,
Sorry for your inconvenience.
We have also received a report from Jean Orloff that
dvips exits abnormally in x86_64 env. See also:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=117203&aid=3168548&group_id=17203
(if \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}) is comment-outed, it works)
Currently we don'
Hi,
Having upgraded to the latest and greatest TeXLive (2010), I am having
problems with some AMS fonts:
< godel:Admin/sparc > dvips courses
This is dvips(k) 5.99 Copyright 2010 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2011.02.06:1853' -> courses.ps
kpathsea:
13 matches
Mail list logo
