Re: [Fink-users] graphviz-2.22.2-1 build fails

2009-09-17 Thread David Fang
've been able to reproduce your error; I'm cc'ing the > maintainer. Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, my only 10.5 machine is kaput, and going in for servicing, so it may be a week+ before I can test it out aga

Re: [Fink-users] graphviz-2.22.2-1 build fails

2009-09-27 Thread David Fang
1.3). I am sure I am missing something but what? >> >> Hello, Stefan. I've been able to reproduce your error; I'm cc'ing the >> maintainer. > > Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, my only 10.5 machine is kaput, and > going in for servicing, s

Re: [Fink-users] graphviz-2.22.2-1 build fails

2009-09-28 Thread David Fang
ed patch this package to build against Apple's Ruby and Tcl to trim down the dependencies. Is there an official/preferred policy now that 10.6 is upon us? Fang David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/

Re: [Fink-users] graphviz-2.22.2-1 build fails

2009-10-03 Thread David Fang
ndence. I've re-uploaded thew new info file combined with the proposed -nox variant that's on the tracker. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2810042&group_id=17203&atid=414256 Fang D

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: gmp-4.3.2-5 failed

2010-05-20 Thread David Fang
fink-buildlock-gmp-4.3.2-5 > (Reading database ... 113727 files and directories currently installed.) > Removing fink-buildlock-gmp-4.3.2-5 ... > Failed: phase compiling: gmp-4.3.2-5 failed > > Before reporting any errors, please run "f

Re: [Fink-users] Can't resolve dependency "util-macros" for package "libxaw3dxft-1.6.2-3"

2012-11-27 Thread David Fang
:34:39 2012, 10.4, >> powerpc >> Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/crypto unstable/ >> main >> >> The problem comes from trying to update xfig. On Tiger no package >> exists containing the word "macro". >> >> -- >

Re: [Fink-users] Fink build of xmlrpc-c on Mointain Lion

2013-01-08 Thread David Fang
t the end of the PatchScript block: >> >> perl -pi -e 's,curl/types.h,curl/curl.h,' lib/curl_transport/curlmulti.c >> lib/curl_transport/curltransaction.c >> lib/curl_transport/xmlrpc_curl_transport.c >> >> Or wait for the maintainer to update the build to make the

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: PatchFile "/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/10.4-EOL/sci/gnuplot.patch" checksum does not match!

2013-01-24 Thread David Fang
//news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- Ma

Re: [Fink-users] Can't resolve dependency "x11-xlocale-fix" for package "vim-7.3.709-1"

2013-01-24 Thread David Fang
d with > > Can't resolve dependency "x11-xlocale-fix" for package "vim-7.3.709-1" (no > matching packages/versions found) > Exiting with failure. > > TIA > > Dominique > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ ---

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libavcodec53-shlibs-0.8.12-2 failed

2013-01-27 Thread David Fang
List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- Maste

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: PatchFile "/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/10.4-EOL/libs/libaprutil.0-shlibs.patch" checksum does not match!

2013-01-30 Thread David Fang
> "/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/10.4-EOL/libs/libaprutil.0-shlibs.patch" > checksum does not match! > Actual: 6f63a00b02f0274c27e8753a3044e342 > Expected: eb4274f2998a4146164237056265fa6e > > TIA > > Dominique &g

Re: [Fink-users] fink install ppl9 on Mountain Lion after upgerd vom Lion does not compile

2013-03-03 Thread David Fang
: rename /sw/src/fink.build/root-ppl9-0.11.2-4/sw/lib/ppl-0.11 to > /sw/src/fink.build/root-ppl9-shlibs-0.11.2-4/sw/lib/ppl-0.11: No such file or > directory > ### execution of /bin/mv failed, exit code 1 > ### execution

Re: [Fink-users] Gnuplot upgrade problem

2013-04-09 Thread David Fang
tion: >> Package manager version: 0.30.2 >> Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Apr 9 20:31:42 2013, 10.4, >> powerpc >> Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main unstable/crypto >> Xcode Version: 2.5-1 >> > > gnuplot's doc

Re: [Fink-users] Gnuplot upgrade problem

2013-04-10 Thread David Fang
Also include the following system information: >> > Package manager version: 0.30.2 >> > Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Tue Apr 9 20:31:42 2013, 10.4, >> > powerpc >> > Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/main >> > u

Re: [Fink-users] transfig.3.2.5d fails to build on PPC Tiger because of patch file

2013-04-16 Thread David Fang
ings >> >> Pete >> >> The human brain operates at only 10% of its capacity. The rest is >> overhead for the operating system. >> >> > > 10.4-EOL stuff goes to fangism. The project does not support 10.4. > > -- David Fang http://www

Re: [Fink-users] Building shared-mime-info-1.1-1 fails on PPC Tiger, Mac OS X 10.4.11

2013-04-16 Thread David Fang
e manager version: 0.30.2 >> Distribution version: selfupdate-cvs Tue Apr 16 09:09:17 2013, 10.4, >> powerpc >> Trees: local/main stable/main stable/crypto unstable/crypto unstable/ >> main >> Xcode Version: 2.5-1 >> >> -- >> Greetings >> &g

Re: [Fink-users] ppl9-0.11.2-4 fails to compile

2013-07-15 Thread David Fang
ld-lock... >> Removing build-lock package... >> /opt/fink/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-ppl9-0.11.2-4 >> (Reading database ... 175181 files and directories currently installed.) >> Removing fink-buildlock-ppl9-0.11.2-4 ... >> Failed: phase compiling: ppl9-0

Re: [Fink-users] ppl9-0.11.2-4 fails to compile

2013-07-15 Thread David Fang
.7 and later, the 'gcc' that fink normally builds with is >> /sw/var/lib/fink/path-prefix-clang/gcc, which wraps clang. (cf. 'fink >> dumpinfo -ePATH ppl9') > > Yes, I saw this after sending my message. I was clutching at straws, trying > to find a compiler

Re: [Fink-users] Error building llvm 3.3 on Mac OS X 10.5.8/PowerPC

2013-10-09 Thread David Fang
though clang apparently advertises >> that it does support blocks, since it got past the ifdef), see lines >> 2926/3178 of the pastebin. >> >> I'm currently trying to build llvm 3.2 to see whether that works bet

Re: [Fink-users] Error building llvm 3.3 on Mac OS X 10.5.8/PowerPC

2013-10-10 Thread David Fang
tries to use it, it pukes when prepending ccache in front of the compiler name; it chokes on CCC='ccache anything', because somewhere they fail to handle spaces between the command names. Hence, the silly dance to create a space-free-compiler-wrapper-name like 'ccgcc' that i

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: cln6-1.3.3-1 failed

2013-11-05 Thread David Fang
Merci, Martin, Fix committed as rev. 2. Fang > This error goes away if one adds > #include > in include/cln/exception.h > > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- November We

Re: [Fink-users] guile20-2.0.9-3 fails to build on 10.7

2013-11-05 Thread David Fang
the latest version. Also, the build >> fails with no install-sh if I switch to a single build job. >> >> Hanspeter >> > > That's the right Xcode/CLI combination. It seems like any updates in > the 4.6.x series for the CLI tools are further down than the

Re: [Fink-users] guile20-2.0.9-3 fails to build on 10.7

2013-11-05 Thread David Fang
party/main local/nieder/10.7/main local/injected >> > Xcode.app: 4.6.3 >> > Xcode command-line tools: 4.6.0.0.1.1365549073 >> > Max. Fink build jobs: 8 >> > >> > Xcode.app and the CLI seem mismatched, but according to the 'Downloads' >> >

Re: [Fink-users] guile20-2.0.9-3 fails to build on 10.7

2013-11-05 Thread David Fang
Thanks for spotting that, Hanspeter. Fixed in patchscript with sed, removed bdep:coreutils, still at rev. 4. Fang > On 11/5/2013 4:57 PM, David Fang wrote: >> Odd, I don't get this error on 10.7, but I'm still on xcode 4.6.2. >> How can build-aux/install-sh be missin

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: ginac2-1.6.1-2 failed

2013-11-11 Thread David Fang
.6.1-2 ... Failed: phase compiling: ginac2-1.6.1-2 failed TIA Dominique -- November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threadin

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: ginac2-1.6.1-2 failed

2013-11-11 Thread David Fang
ated the md5 value and the package installed without further problem. > > Thanks for the patch, > > Dominique > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran

Re: [Fink-users] Fink internal procedures by hand

2014-01-21 Thread David Fang
leclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > ___ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.m

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase installing: llvm34-3.4-0e failed

2014-02-16 Thread David Fang
lvm34 worked but required to go through > > fink scanpackages > sudo apt-get update > sudo apt-get install llvm34-shlibs=3.4-0e libcxx1-shlibs=3.4-0e > > to update all packages. > > Dominique > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase installing: llvm34-3.4-0e failed

2014-02-16 Thread David Fang
why I was wondering if something went wrong much earlier than expected. Installation always occurs from the 'last' stage build, which varies by distribution/architecture. David > ? > > Cheers, > > Dominique > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ ---

Re: [Fink-users] Compilation of guile18 hangs

2014-03-31 Thread David Fang
iled. This > time, the error message is > > ERROR: invalid arglist syntax: (hash paren_open SCM alist comma SCM key > paren_close) > > Since this comes from

Re: [Fink-users] Compilation of guile18 hangs

2014-04-01 Thread David Fang
I also asked upstream in #guile, they are aware of some clang issues, some of which have been addresed in 2.0.11, which I have not yet updated. It's on my radar now, I'll find some time to try it. But you don't have to wait for me :) Fang > On 1/04/14 00:51, David Fang

Re: [Fink-users] Compilation of guile18 hangs

2014-04-01 Thread David Fang
t you don't have to wait for me > :) > > Fang > >> On 1/04/14 00:51, David Fang wrote: >> > Martin, >> >Thanks for the report. I don't have 10.8/9 to test, only >> > 10.7. >> > Something looks odd in your patch, the

Re: [Fink-users] Compilation of guile18 hangs

2014-04-02 Thread David Fang
Thanks for testing, Martin. I have incorporated your fix (conceptually) for guile20, and conditioned it on 10.9, since 10.7 worked without it. Someone else will have to test it on 10.8 for me. I haven't touched guile18 yet. Fang > On 1/04/14 21:49, David Fang wrote: >>

Re: [Fink-users] ppl9 build failure on 10.9

2014-04-02 Thread David Fang
ork/Home not found. > > $ /usr/libexec/java_home > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home > > I'm guessing that parsing `/usr/libexec/java_home` is a better way to go > here for portability and to de

Re: [Fink-users] guile18-1.8.8-6 build hangs

2014-04-18 Thread David Fang
ocedures.texi || { rm guile-procedures.texi; false; } >> > > ERROR: Unbound variable: define >> > >> > This appears to be due to the new clang in Xcode 5.1. >> >> It must be, as the thing installs fine from the binary distribution... > > I have had a

Re: [Fink-users] Problem compiling guile20-2.0.11-1

2014-05-05 Thread David Fang
ng fink-buildlock-guile20-2.0.11-1 ... >>>>>> Failed: phase compiling: guile20-2.0.11-1 failed >> [] >>> I'll cc the maintainer. >> >> This is the problem that was fixed by un-optimizing the compilation of vm.c. >> The fix is currently conditioned

Re: [Fink-users] Problems installing (compiling) autogen-5.18.2-3on OSX 10.9

2014-05-31 Thread David Fang
nce, which also reported the use of gc. And > otool-L reported libgettext8 too. I'll commit a dep upgrade momentarily... > dan > > -- > Daniel Macks > dma...@netspace.org > > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -

Re: [Fink-users] ppl9 build failure on 10.9

2014-06-18 Thread David Fang
of > the build completes), but apparently one of the other dependencies fixed > things. > > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk

Re: [Fink-users] guile-1.8-snarf error (was Re: Missing dependency in Fink's geda-gaf)

2014-07-07 Thread David Fang
-1989,2 +1989,2 @@ > -SCM_DEFINE (set_picture_data_vector_x, "%set-picture-data/vector!", > -3, 0, 0, (SCM obj_s, SCM data_s, SCM filename_s), > +SCM_DEFINE (set_picture_data_vector_x, "%set-picture-data/vector!", 3, 0, 0, > + (SCM obj_s, SCM data_

Re: [Fink-users] guile-1.8-snarf error (was Re: Missing dependency in Fink's geda-gaf)

2014-07-07 Thread David Fang
Charles, Can geda (and friends) use guile20 yet? Fang > On 8/07/14 00:10, David Fang wrote: >> Martin, and all, >> Are there multiple places that need the CR fix? If this is an >> isolated case, I could just apply that patch as a workaround. > > In the sour

Re: [Fink-users] guile-1.8-snarf error (was Re: Missing dependency in Fink's geda-gaf)

2014-07-21 Thread David Fang
On Jul 8, 2014, at 7:25 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:10 PM, David Fang wrote: >> >>> Charles, >>> >>> Can geda (and friends) use guile20 yet? >> >> Theoretically, yes. If I just replace guile18* with guile20 in the Fink in

Re: [Fink-users] guile-1.8-snarf error (was Re: Missing dependency in Fink's geda-gaf)

2014-07-21 Thread David Fang
n Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jul 21, 2014, at 1:46 PM, David Fang wrote: > >> Charles, >> Is that an error during *building* guile20, or during use of guile20 in >> your package? I unfortunately don't have 10.9 for testing, but I can ask >&g

Re: [Fink-users] build error in libmpc3 was Re: fink install octave problems

2014-09-21 Thread David Fang
lude/mpfr.h I have a note which says: > > /* GMP's internal __gmp_const macro has been removed on 2012-03-04: > http://gmplib.org:8000/gmp/rev/d287cfaf6732 >const is standard and now assumed to be available. If th

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: graphviz-2.26.3-10 failed

2014-10-22 Thread David Fang
minique > > -- > ___ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Li

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: graphviz-2.26.3-10 failed

2014-10-22 Thread David Fang
- > ___ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List ar

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: graphviz-2.26.3-10 failed

2014-10-23 Thread David Fang
ot;13" ]; then perl -pi -e 's|#include ||g' plugin/quartz/gvloadimage_quartz.c fi -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- __

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: install phase: directory /sw64/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4.2-2/llvm-3.4.2.src doesn't exist, check the package description

2014-10-27 Thread David Fang
_ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user > Subscription management: > https://list

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: cppunit1.12.1-1.12.1-2 failed

2014-10-27 Thread David Fang
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: install phase: directory /sw64/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4.2-2/llvm-3.4.2.src doesn't exist, check the package description

2014-10-28 Thread David Fang
-org2 (0.18.2-2) ... Clearing dependency_libs of .la files being installed Failed: install phase: directory /sw64/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4.2-2/llvm-3.4.2.src doesn't exist, check the package description Dominique Le 27 oct. 2014 à 18:52, David Fang a écrit : Uhh, THAT's weird

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: install phase: directory /sw64/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4.2-2/llvm-3.4.2.src doesn't exist, check the package description

2014-11-04 Thread David Fang
tains build/ cfe-3.4.2.src/ compiler-rt-3.4/ libcxx-3.4/ llvm-3.4.2.src/ openmp-r208472/ opt-bin/ polly-3.4/ Dominique Le 28 oct. 2014 à 11:05, David Fang a écrit : Dominique, What about in: /sw64/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4.2-2 since it seems like your %p == /sw64. What diectorie

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: ppl9-0.11.2-5 failed

2014-12-16 Thread David Fang
Hi all, I've committed an update that modernizes the search for java headers, which now matches ppl13's behavior. Tested on x86_64-darwin11, using xcode 4.6.2. Fang On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Saleh Elmohamed wrote: > mac-saleh$ fink list -it system-java > Information about 11359 packages r

Re: [Fink-users] gmp build error

2010-10-08 Thread David Fang
s from g++-4.2 to g++-4 (likewise), it > seems to compile just fine. So I seem to have solved my own problem, > but I thought I'd pass the fix upstream. > > David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -

Re: [Fink-users] gmp build error

2010-10-08 Thread David Fang
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb > ___ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Fink-users] fink gmp

2011-05-26 Thread David Fang
>> Before reporting any errors, please run "fink selfupdate" and >> try again. If you continue to have issues, please check to see if the >> FAQ on fink's website solves the problem. If not, ask on the fink-users >> or fink-beginners mailing lists, with a carbo

Re: [Fink-users] Problem with gmp

2011-05-26 Thread David Fang
ck_mpz()in t-assign.o >>> check_mpz()in t-assign.o >>> ld: symbol(s) not found >>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >>> make[4]: *** [t-assign] Error 1 >>> make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2 >>> make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Er

Re: [Fink-users] Problem with gmp

2011-05-27 Thread David Fang
. > Failed: phase compiling: gmp5-5.0.2-1 failed > > -- > Professor Don Paul > Superconductivity & Magnetism Group > Department of Physics > University of Warwick > Coventry CV4 7AL > United Kingdom

Re: [Fink-users] Problem with gmp

2011-06-03 Thread David Fang
oup > Department of Physics > University of Warwick > Coventry CV4 7AL > United Kingdom > > emailph...@warwick.ac.uk > tel 024 76 523603 > -- > > > > On 28 May 2011, at 00:0

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: guile18-1.8.8-1 failed

2011-06-11 Thread David Fang
-- > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > __

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: guile18-1.8.8-1 failed

2011-06-13 Thread David Fang
ving build-lock package... > /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-guile18-1.8.8-1 > (Reading database ... 439579 files and directories currently installed.) > Removing fink-buildlock-guile18-1.8.8-1 ... > Failed: phase compiling: guile18-1.8.8-1 failed > > TIA > > Dom

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: guile18-1.8.8-1 failed

2011-06-14 Thread David Fang
fix, Dan, I'm re-testing with TestDepends: f-p-p and TestConfirgureParams: -e-d-t which overrides -d-d-t in maintainer mode. Will commit your fix later today. Why do latent problems always get discove

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: gmp5-5.0.2-2 failed

2011-08-31 Thread David Fang
e check to see if the FAQ on Fink's > website solves the problem. If not, ask on one of these mailing lists: > > The Fink Users List > The Fink Beginners List > , > > with a carbon copy to the maintainer: > >David Fang > > Note that this

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-08 Thread David Fang
Added. My bad. > On 9/8/11 11:31 AM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >> Alex, >> >> Thanks for the fixes. In my previous mail I failed to mentioned 10.4-EOL. >> It requires (2) also and fltk-backend.patch is missing. >> >> TIA >> >> Domini

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-08 Thread David Fang
kit for Octave > physicalconstants-oct305 0.1.7-3Physical constants > for octave > specfun-oct305 1.0.9-1Special functions > for Octave > struct-oct305 1.0.6-2St

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-08 Thread David Fang
stants > for octave > i specfun-oct324 1.0.9-1Special functions > for Octave > i struct-oct324 1.0.9-2 Structure > manipulations functions for Octave > i z

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-10 Thread David Fang
> Oh _ I see that on 10.4-EOL this was NOT fixed ... > D. Fang is apparently taking care of that; in the > meantime, just remove the '-ff2c' flags from the FFLAGS > in the info file, > and do the same if needed for arpack and qrupdate, then > rebuild first the latter

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-11 Thread David Fang
-lz -lm -lGraphicsMagick -lmetis >&5 > configure:12141: $? = 0 > configure:12141: ./conftest > ./configure: line 1: 2554 Segmentation fault ./conftest$ac_exeext > > for CDOTU. It seems that atlas is not taken into account and that -ff2c is > required without it. Not t

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-12 Thread David Fang
BLAS.dylib:/System/Library/Frameworks/Accelerate.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/vecLib.framework/Versions/A/libBLAS.dylib >> >> configure: -lhdf5 -lz -lm -lGraphicsMagick -lmetis >&5 >> configure: 12141: $? = 0 >> configure: 12141: ./conftest >> ./configure: line 1:

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-13 Thread David Fang
gt;> > ... >> > >> > and indeed gsl-oct324-1.0.8-1 failed again. The offending test is >> > >> > configure: 12141: /sw/bin/gfortran-fsf-4.6 -o conftest -O3 -L/sw/lib >> > configure: conftest.f >> > configure: >> >

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-14 Thread David Fang
on the next update. > >> >> Work in progress here. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dominique > > > - -- > Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. > Fink User Liaison > http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darw

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-19 Thread David Fang
, at 22:44, David Fang wrote: Hi all, I've been trying to build octave324 on i386-darwin10 now, and I think I understand the cause of more ff2c-related failures. On both darwin8 and darwin10, the Accelerate framework needs -ff2c for the correct calling convention to system-atlas. Any f

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-19 Thread David Fang
-6... Error: Shlibs field says compatibility version for /sw/lib/libarpack.0.dylib is 1.0.0, but it is actually 1.1.0. Fang > On 19 Sep 2011, at 22:02, David Fang wrote: > >> Alex, >> I'm trying your arpack, and for both (. -atlas), I get link failures on >> powerp

Re: [Fink-users] Glitches related to octave

2011-09-19 Thread David Fang
Hi, >> Ok for darwin8, I got rid of: >> >> -Wl,@LOAD@,$(ARPACKLIB) >> >> in favor of the simple: >> >> $(ARPACKLIB) > > I hope tmp/*.o is somewhere on the link line.. >> >> And the build succeeded, but strangely, validator now reports a different >> compatibility version (even though %v is th

Re: [Fink-users] More glitches related to octave

2011-10-12 Thread David Fang
User Liaison > http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk6VlBAACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ9UNQCfdzE89Y2aepk5dyxBGaYVliam > LkcAoILXQc3OyfBFb0Ow08MFYINku4IC > =

Re: [Fink-users] More glitches related to octave

2011-10-21 Thread David Fang
nd 10.5/i386 as of yet. > > I'm cc'ing Jack Howarth on this, since he may have some insight as to > why we're only seeing this error in the interaction of > gfortran-fsf-4.6 with Accelerate (or vecLib, more precisely) on > 10.5/x86_64 and 10.6/x86_64, and if there is anything that

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: arpack-96patched-6 failed

2011-11-07 Thread David Fang
sw/lib/gcc4.6/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0/4.6.2/../../../libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib(single > module) definition of ___bswapdi2 > /sw/lib/gcc4.6/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8.11.0/4.6.2/../../../libgcc_ext.10.4.dylib(single > module) definition of ___floatundisf > /sw/lib/gcc4.6/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8.

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: arpack-96patched-6 failed

2011-11-08 Thread David Fang
e package in the stable tree (10.4-EOL), so bundle-octave in unstable (and all of its sub-packages) will be building using the stable octave324 in 10.4-EOL. Alex, do you expect any problems with this, since you've updated

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: arpack-96patched-6 failed

2011-11-10 Thread David Fang
oct324" for package >> ... >> Also added. I somehow missed that one when validating in the unstable >> tree. > > Thanks, but now it fails with > > Can't resolve dependency "multicore-oct324" for package > "bundle-octave324-atlas-20111005-1&q

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: arpack-96patched-6 failed

2011-11-10 Thread David Fang
ssing: > /sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/10.4-EOL/sci/octave324-atlas-dev_3.2.4-601_darwin-powerpc.deb > ### execution of /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 1 > Failed: can't install package octave324-atlas-dev-3.2.4-6

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libtool2-2.4.2-1 failed

2011-12-08 Thread David Fang
et/sfu/splunk-novd2d > ___ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user > Subscription management: > h

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: libtool2-2.4.2-1 failed

2011-12-09 Thread David Fang
Correct, 10.5.x does not see the 10.4-EOL files. :) Fang > Am 08.12.2011 um 23:03 schrieb David Fang: > >> I 'fixed' this by passing FC=no GCJ=no to configure in >> 10.4-EOL/devel/libtool2.info. (Already had F77=no before). > > David, > > I just tri

Re: [Fink-users] Checksum for gcc-4.4.6-1001 patch not correct?

2011-12-14 Thread David Fang
vent for > developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it > provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. > Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure > ___ &

Re: [Fink-users] Build of cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23-4 on Tiger/PPC fails due to some lock glibtool is waiting to be removed

2011-12-14 Thread David Fang
pO3rKjQ+MXgCeMtfJH6lgi2RLFaiyvDuLaN8C > +2YAn0fwvj4uM17QDH9hGIDvQinHmNgi > =6QM/ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- > Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future? > This paper surveys cloud computing today: What are the ben

Re: [Fink-users] gnutls28-3.0.8-1 cannot be built because /sw/lib/libnettle.4.dylib not installed

2011-12-19 Thread David Fang
eforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training

Re: [Fink-users] gcc46 patch for 10.4?

2012-02-01 Thread David Fang
st Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/

Re: [Fink-users] Can't resolve dependency "file-listing-pm586" for package "libwww-pm586-6.03-1"

2012-02-03 Thread David Fang
t > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ -- T

Re: [Fink-users] Can't resolve dependency "file-listing-pm586" for package "libwww-pm586-6.03-1"

2012-02-06 Thread David Fang
Committed again. Removed 586 from 6.03 in EOL. Sorry about that. >> Fixed just now, just needed to preserve the previous version of libwww-pm > > Sorry, but on Sun Feb 5 13:33:57 CET 2012, it is still failing. > > TIA > > Dominique > -- David Fang http://www.

Re: [Fink-users] gcc46 patch for 10.4?

2012-02-06 Thread David Fang
nce. > ? Anton Checov > > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning li

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: PatchFile "/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/10.4-EOL/languages/gcc44.patch" checksum does not match!

2012-03-21 Thread David Fang
--- > This SF email is sponsosred by: > Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure > ___ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net > List archive: > http://news.gman

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: PatchFile "/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/10.4-EOL/languages/gcc44.patch" checksum does not match!

2012-03-21 Thread David Fang
Greetings > > Pete > > They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety > deserve neither liberty nor safety. > -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania > > --

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: cpan-meta-yaml-pm-0.008-1 failed

2012-04-09 Thread David Fang
> For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. > Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. > Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 > ___ > Fink-users mailing list > Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: cpan-meta-yaml-pm-0.008-1 failed

2012-04-09 Thread David Fang
2.26-1 Parse 02packages.details.txt.gz > parse-cpan-packages-pm584 2.26-1 Parse 02packages.details.txt.gz > parse-cpan-packages-pm586 2.33-1 Parse 02packages.details.txt.gz > parse-cpan-packages-pm588 2.33-1 Parse 02packages.details.txt.gz > > Dominique >

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: cpan-meta-yaml-pm-0.008-1 failed

2012-04-09 Thread David Fang
first thing I have tried): > > The following package will be installed or updated: > cpan-meta-pm586 > The following additional package will be installed: > cpan-meta-yaml-pm > > So this goes back to case 1;-( > > Dominique > -- David Fang htt

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: cpan-meta-yaml-pm-0.008-1 failed

2012-04-10 Thread David Fang
rl module to create a module > Makefile > extutils-makemaker-pm588-bin[virtual package] > > Dominique > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/ -- Better t

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: ffmpeg-0.7.13-1 failed

2012-06-21 Thread David Fang
Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.e

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: ffmpeg-0.7.13-1 failed

2012-06-21 Thread David Fang
gcc (4.0.1/apple). > > The default gcc on this box is 4.0.1, but I have 4.2.1 in /usr/bin/ > so it is picked by > ># Prefer compilation with gcc-4.2 if available >if [ -x /usr/bin/gcc-4.2 ]; then > ../configure %c --cc=gcc-4.2 >else > ../configure %c &

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: ffmpeg-0.7.13-1 failed

2012-06-21 Thread David Fang
Good to know, thanks for testing! >> Could you try again with those lines of the CompileScript removed, ... > > Actually I have moved /usr/bin/gcc-4.2 away and the build has completed. > > Dominique > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ ht

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: PatchFile "/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/finkinfo/10.4-EOL/sci/matplotlib-py.patch" checksum does not match!

2012-06-21 Thread David Fang
net > List archive: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user > Subscription management: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users > -- David Fang http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/ http://www.achronix.com/

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: qrupdate-atlas-1.1.2-4 failed

2012-07-09 Thread David Fang
uot; Makeconf >> perl -pi -e "s|^(LAPACK=)-llapack|\1-llapack|" Makeconf >> >> fixes the problem. >> >> TIA >> >> Dominique >> > > I'm not supporting 10.4, and I'm trying to minimize the divergence > between

Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: qrupdate-atlas-1.1.2-4 failed

2012-07-09 Thread David Fang
as|LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS >> > $MYLDFLAGS\n\1-lf77blas|" Makeconf >> > perl -pi -e "s|^(LAPACK=)-llapack|\1-llapack|" Makeconf >> > >> > fixes the problem. >> > >> > TIA >> > >>

Re: [Fink-users] What feature would you like to see in fink/Fink?

2006-11-23 Thread David Fang
packages as much as possible after the first build-failure, analogous to make -k, but for packages. Things still go wrong once in a while during mass upgrades, and this would allow independent packages to continue building. The benefit, very little, just convenience for when updates g

  1   2   >