Re: [Firebird-docs] GitHub, Build bugs with Java 9, Assorted Questions!

2018-02-18 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 14/02/18 08:11, Mark Rotteveel wrote: >> ... I've cleaned out the known_hosts entry, as advised, and reconnected to add the new one back in, but now I'm asked for a password. Do I need to send Sergey my public key again? Possibly, it could also mean you're not offering the (right) SSH key

Re: [Firebird-docs] GitHub, Build bugs with Java 9, Assorted Questions!

2018-02-18 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 14/02/18 08:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote: Q3. Anyone else seen this? With a clean build? Oracle Java 9? The build doesn't work with Java 9. In any case, it works OK for me with Java 8, on Windows. Ok, good news there. I've downgraded Java to Java 8, removed the fork="true" additions and bui

Re: [Firebird-docs] GitHub, Build bugs with Java 9, Assorted Questions!

2018-02-18 Thread Norman Dunbar
Testing testing. Apologies for the noise. A few emails I sent to the list yesterday have yet to arrive - they are not in spam either. Helen's reply to a query in FB-Support yesterday arrived here after the OP had responded to Helen. It can't be a moderation thing - as Helen wouldn't normally

[Firebird-docs] Issue DOC-129 resolved.

2018-02-18 Thread Norman Dunbar
Morning All, it's currently 10:25 UK time. My emails to the list seem to be taking a few days to get to the docs list at the moment, so I've no idea if or when you will see this! I've updated the gfix manual to resolve issue DOC-129 whereby the sweep interval was incorrectly defined. I've

Re: [Firebird-docs] GitHub, Build bugs with Java 9, Assorted Questions!

2018-02-18 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 2018-02-16 19:13, Norman Dunbar wrote: On 14/02/18 08:01, Mark Rotteveel wrote: Q3. Anyone else seen this? With a clean build? Oracle Java 9? The build doesn't work with Java 9. In any case, it works OK for me with Java 8, on Windows. Ok, good news there. I've downgraded Java to Java 8,

Re: [Firebird-docs] Issue DOC-129 resolved.

2018-02-18 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 2018-02-17 11:30, Norman Dunbar wrote: Morning All, it's currently 10:25 UK time. My emails to the list seem to be taking a few days to get to the docs list at the moment, so I've no idea if or when you will see this! At the beginning of the week, SourceForge moved datacenters, and somethi

Re: [Firebird-docs] Issue DOC-129 resolved.

2018-02-18 Thread Mark Rotteveel
On 2018-02-17 11:30, Norman Dunbar wrote: it's currently 10:25 UK time. My emails to the list seem to be taking a few days to get to the docs list at the moment, so I've no idea if or when you will see this! Specifically, your mail has been stuck for close to 32 hours somewhere inside sourcefo

[Firebird-docs] [FirebirdSQL/firebird-documentation] 5e4f2f: DOC-129 - Corrected definition of Sweep Interval.

2018-02-18 Thread paulvink
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird-documentation Commit: 5e4f2f96b9d8658749682e30de5f7a20c4841663 https://github.com/FirebirdSQL/firebird-documentation/commit/5e4f2f96b9d8658749682e30de5f7a20c4841663 Author: Norman Dunbar Date: 2018-02-17 (

Re: [Firebird-docs] Issue DOC-129 resolved.

2018-02-18 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi all, [ about committing to B_Release ] > Depending on the exact needs, it might take some advanced git-fu, and > the simplest solution may turn out to be to just copy the latest state > and commit that to B_Release, without merging the specific file-history > on the branch. And that's exactly

Re: [Firebird-docs] Issue DOC-129 resolved.

2018-02-18 Thread Paul Vinkenoog
Hi Norman, > I've updated the gfix manual to resolve issue DOC-129 whereby the sweep > interval was incorrectly defined. > > I've raised a pull request from my specially created branch DOC-129 for > the resolution. I've just merged your commit. But since this is 'your own' doc, you might just a