Steve Miller wrote:
>> well, you know, it depends on the test, but I can tell you that I'm getting
>> much better results out of SQL Server right now, but I'm working on this, my
>> intention is having a fb backend much faster than anything else... and yes,
>> I didn't see any different from Exp
> well, you know, it depends on the test, but I can tell you that I'm getting
> much better results out of SQL Server right now, but I'm working on this, my
> intention is having a fb backend much faster than anything else... and yes,
> I didn't see any different from Express or no-express... A
ress... Are you sure it
only uses one processor?
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers"
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird s
> Well, needless to say I'm pretty happy with Firebird, which I believe is a
> great db. In fact up to 10 concurrent users (I'm talking about our system,
> it will obviously vary with others) Fb is better than SQL Server.
>
>
> Well, I tried both with SQLServer 2005 (a developers' release) and
quot;For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers"
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird scalability under heavy load
> Hi Pablo,
>
> Thank you for publishing your numbers.
>
>> On the other hand, in my test, the em
Hi Pablo,
Thank you for publishing your numbers.
> On the other hand, in my test, the embedded server is slower than the
> "external" one: 444s to complete the embedded vs 291 the "external".
> Just to give some data to compare: using SQL Server the same test
> (exactly the same code base) req
Hello:
> Ok, the first two methods (Fetch & Free) eat about 26% of the test time
> and they're basically spending their times at FbClient.isc_dsql_fetch and
> FbClient.isc_dsql_free_statement.
>
Maybe the problem could be in the fact the fetches are done with only one
record in each time, whi
On 1/14/08, pablosantosluac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a place where I can find a performance benchmark comparing Firebird
> with other dbs??
Probably yes. But better to ask in support list.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http:
2008 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird scalability under heavy load
> On 1/13/08, pablosantosluac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On the other hand, in my test, the embedded server is slower than the
>> "external" one: 444s to complete the embed
On 1/13/08, pablosantosluac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, in my test, the embedded server is slower than the
> "external" one: 444s to complete the embedded vs 291 the "external". Just to
> give some data to compare: using SQL Server the same test (exactly the same
> code ba
Hello:
Ok, so, you mean I should try with the new 2.0+ provider? I mean, we are
> having the same problems with the "server" (not the
>
embedded one).
>
Well no, it maybe a problem on it, but we may try to check where is the
problem ( the 2.0+ has performance changes on other areas as well, b
as we do using SQL
Server.
pablo
- Original Message -
From: Carlos
To: For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird scalability under heavy load
Hello:
We have to cont
Hello:
We have to continue using .NET 1.1 that's why we didn't move to a newer
> provider.
>
Ok, it maybe a provider problem, in version 2.0+ there are several changes
in the embedded server support some of them to solver performance problems (
that if i remember well they are not applied to 1.7
.NET providers
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Firebird-net-provider] Firebird scalability under heavy load
Hello:
The thing is: I run a query which takes X seconds to complete. Well, two
threads doing the same in parallel takes > 2xX which doesn't
ost likely one to blame here, but you never know
until you try it...
pablo
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Harding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers"
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Firebir
Hello:
The thing is: I run a query which takes X seconds to complete. Well, two
> threads doing the same in parallel takes > 2xX which doesn't look like a
> good scalability factor.
As Dean has stated yet without a little more of information ti's going to be
hard to help ...
What version of Fir
pablosantosluac wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I'm running stress tests on Plastic with a Fb backend, and as soon as the
> server starts attending several clients, we've a huge performance hit! Just
> configuring plastic to use SQL Server solves the problem.
Um, what is "plastic"?
> The thing is: I ru
17 matches
Mail list logo
