Hi Geoff,
Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au [firebird-support] wrote:
At 02:36 p.m. 30/10/2014, Geoff Worboys
ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au [firebird-support] wrote:
Doesn't that depend on how they implemented the separate threads?
SS does/can use different threads for separate connections
Hi,
I see 75 buffers - then i suppose you used default config.
Increase defaultdbcachepages settings in firebird config and try again with
superserver.
I do not see other reason for 30 minutes calc..
Regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
- Reply message -
Od: t...@camalot.ca
Hi,
it seems to me, that execute statement on external enters NULL in the
target table in columns that are not mentioned in an insert statement -
at least, the default values from domain definition are not used.
Example:
in test.fdb
create domain D_TID as integer default current_transaction;
'Thomas Steinmaurer' t...@iblogmanager.com [firebird-support] wrote:
I once did a short video with a very simple/naive SMP
capability test across SS and SC.
http://www.iblogmanager.com/download/demos/firebird/fb25_architectures_smp.html
Although with SS internally requests to the same
Hi all,
I try to figure out why i have a problem in my database since i convert it
from firebird 1.5 (dialect 1, no charset ) to firebird 2.5 (dialect 3 and
defined charset to utf8).
The following SQL failed in the new database (fb 2.5 dialect 3). It worked in
fb 1.5 (dialect 1).
Hi,
Did you run this outside ibexpert?
What is exactly error message and code?
Try it with flamerobin or fbsql.
And then post info.
Regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
- Reply message -
Od: caste...@titelive.be [firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Do:
Thanks for your reaction Karol,
The exact message given by IBexpert is :
can't format message 13:198 -- message file C:\Windows\firebird.msg not found.
arithmetic exception, numeric overflow, or string truncation.
numeric value is out of range.
The error also occurs in our Delphi application
The definition of numeric calculation was changed between dialect 1 and 3 with
Interbase 6. This is described in the Interbase 6 getting started (available
from the website).
Basically in dialect 1 this type of division overflowed into double precision,
it doesn't in dialect 3 and your result
Thanks Mark.
I’ll read the documentation again (for this). At migration time, I saw that we
didn’t have fields with numeric definition… and i passed that section. But i
didn’t noticed that we had “numeric” in our stored procedures…. And I fall on
it now.
Great thanks ! I go back to
On Oct 29, 2014, at 9:36 PM, Geoff Worboys ge...@telesiscomputing.com.au
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Doesn't that depend on how they implemented the separate threads?
SS does/can use different threads for separate connections to the
same database, can't it?
Thanks
Well, first of all - thank you for your time.
Trace log still showed nothing but I finally noticed a pattern and talked
to one of the devs (who didn`t know but has access to the source) -
apparently I`m going to have to strangle someone who has never seen the
size of a production database :)
Hi All
I am new to FB and i am at design time evaluting some data types to choose for
my DB
I have some doubt on what to choose between “bigger” Varchar around 75char max
and a Blob file type.
My main doubt is wich one to prefer from 2 point of view :
First , supposing I would have to store
Hi
I know that FB as software doesnt have any limit to the users that can access
the engine.
I am wondering if is there any “access limit” imposed from a windows system
server (like the latest 2008/2012)
that will require to buy extra licenses
I suppose that If I will install FB server on a
There is no Windows imposed limit on the number of users. Even if you run on a
server. Except of course if you deploy a client app on the server and users
access it using RDP. Then each user would need a CAL, but otherwise , no
restrictions.
Do not run FB server on a serer that is a domain
15 matches
Mail list logo
