At the End For
More Than One Columns Specified in Order By Clause?
Meaning was same.
On Friday, 13 March 2015 11:06 PM, 'liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl'
liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi,
Following stackoverflow i see
Hi,
or better for “The SQL may return one or more records with a blank B4Me. In
which case, Natural order can be used for those records, and they are all
considered First or rather, Before everything else”
select CASE WHEN B4ME IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END, CASE WHEN B4ME IS NULL THEN
ID ELSE
Hi,
you must rethink what you try to retrive. What is then sense of returning
somethink in case of cycles?
If you have cycles then you do not get something before..
But if you need something strange then it is simple
ID as integer
select CASE WHEN B4ME IS NULL THEN ID ELSE B4ME+1 END,
For example in Java the default result set is forward only. If it doesn't
have rows, it will fetch a number (default is 400 in Jaybird), this is done
through a fetch. It will then serve requests for rows from the application
from this retrieved set of rows. When it needs more, it discards the old
server running.
Jack
On 6/11/2015 12:09 PM, liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
[firebird-support] wrote:
Hi,
no i mean go to
http://www.firebirdsql.org/en/snapshot-builds/
download e.g. Windows build
Firebird-2.5.5.26887
unzip it and get gbak.exe
and do backup
Hi,
i do not know what should happen in your case when FIEL3 is null?
But you can try
WHERE FIEL1=:F1 AND FIEL2=:F2 AND (FIEL3=COALESCE(:F3, FIEL3) ) INTO .. DO
..
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 1:29 PM
To:
Hi,
have you sample database to reproduce this.
How you test this difference? Have you some backup of database and restore it
and then test this two options?
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2015 5:48 AM
To:
shows me.
The table had not NULL neither duplicated values in the column ID.
Greetings.
Walter.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 12:37 PM, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi,
have you sample database to reproduce this.
How you test
Hi,
No – you can not create single index on more then one table
But you really need it?
How big is resultset? I do not see any filter in this query no HAVING nor WHERE
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 7:28 PM
To:
-child relationship, where ASIENTOSCAB
is the parent.
Greetings.
Walter.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:40 PM, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi,
No – you can not create single index on more then one table
But you really need
-child relationship, where ASIENTOSCAB
is the parent.
Greetings.
Walter.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:40 PM, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Hi,
No – you can not create single index on more then one table
But you really need
Hi,
why do you need to slow down query by index?
If you go throught whole table and only some sub percent (REPL) is not looked
for?
consider something like this
VALUE=’RX’ 100 records
VALUE=’YY’ 100 records
VALUE=’XX’ 100 records
VALUE=’AA’ 100 records
VALUE=’REPL’ 100 records
then this is
All fields in condition which needs
paramerter value, I have crated every single index for individual column.
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 6:23 PM, "liviuslivius
liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]"
<firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Hi,
you have few wa
Hi,
ORDER BY CASE USER_NAME WHEN ‘PAUL’ THEN 1 WHEN ‘JOHN’ THEN 2 .. END
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 5:20 PM
To: Firebird Support
Subject: [firebird-support] Order by
Hello everyone
There is the possibility
Hi,
too few details – but maybe calling convention. Should be cdecl
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:52 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [firebird-support] How to debug an external UDF
I There,
Hi,
this group does not support attachments
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 2:59 PM
To: Yahoo! Inc.
Subject: [firebird-support] How To Get Entire Linked Group Details
Hi All,
I have attached a table DDL and
Hi,
look into Firebird.log – there are more infos about corruptions recognized by
gfix
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 2:53 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [firebird-support] Error on Gfix
Hi!
Hi,
i am really surprised – why reinvent the wheel?
All people use table with version information and this work years.
Table have benefit – you can include version description (what’s new).
At application start or installer – you check if db is up to date or if
instaler is not older than
Hi,
one select do not guarantee consistency if you run something outside of
transaction context.
And because of this, in Firebird there is no possibility to do this.
consider folowing example
select
*
from
header h
inner join detail d on d.id_h=h.id
server do loop throught streams and:
1. it
Hi,
i see that you have only partial key usage on 1/4
only BelgeNo is used because you do not use “BARKOD” – is this intentional?
FROM BAZLISTE XYZ
where
BelgeNo = 'REYSAS' AND AdresKodu = 'SAYIM' AND IslemTuru = 'SA'
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From:
Hi,
as you can see in query plan – you have natural (full table scan).
And hash match you see in MSSQL “because” you have not optimized query.
Your query use a lot of RAM and CPU to return value. MSSQL built hash table and
join streams.
But this query will be slower and slower if your table
I do not spend much time on this – maybe my conclusions are not good but also
you have not any index usage for this subquery
SELECT
AdresKodu,
IslemTuru,
BelgeNo,
barkod,
olcubirimi
FROM
>>This was done knowingly because
>>keeping transaction information would greatly increase the size of index
>>entries - one transaction id for the transaction
>>that created the record version with the value sought, plus one for the
>>transaction that changed the value. Obviously
>>that
Hi Ann,
This is the crux of the matter
“Index entries for the old and new versions of a record all contain the DBKey
of the primary (newest) record version. When doing an indexed lookup,
Firebird walks backward through the record versions until it finds one that
the current transaction can see,
Hi,
just curious – why not superserver?
I do not know what your system do and if it is cpu intensive –
but i always use superserver because of big cache and this is for me biggest
speed up.
I use superserver in environment with ~400 connections (near constant) and high
load without problem.
>>No, the index entry does not include transaction information. So yes, if
>>you have a database that includes something
>>m to m relationship, the junctions records have to be read to validate
>>them for the current transaction. M to m
>>relationships are typically something like: students,
Hi,
is this possible to disable cache at all?
I mean that all go from and to “HDD” without RAM between.
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
>> Hi,
>>is this possible to disable cache at all?
>> I mean that all go from and to “HDD” without RAM between.
>Checkout the FileSystemCacheThreshold configuration parameter in
>firebird.conf. Set it to 0 and also use a small page buffers value.
>Another area of RAM usage is for temporary data
Hi,
i have few questions releated to your problem
1. What is your sweep settings?
2. When you run backup and do you use gbak or nbackup?
3. what is your transactions settings? Do you use readonly readcommited or
prefered shapshot?
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
Hi,
i do not know what do you mean “to check”
Can you connect to db? or you cannot and need to check?
If you can connect, then this is simple:
SELECT r.MON$ODS_MAJOR, r.MON$ODS_MINOR
FROM MON$DATABASE r
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
Hi,
This detection is useless .
use the latest library (FB3) and you can connect to any older servers
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 6:50 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [firebird-support] Checking
Hi,
what is your connection string?
If you try to connect on shared – then this not work(you can enable this in
config but this is not good choice at all)
normally connection string looks like:
127.0.0.1/3050:C:\baza\baza.fb
3050 port can be ommited
you can on local system connect by:
Hi,
first help us to help you.
Without any detail we can talking about weather
Did you identify some slow down in particular query – different query plan...
Have you compared Firebird.conf?
Did you compare server hardware? I suppose that new Windows is on different
hardware – not always better
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Checking Ods version (2.5 <-> 3.0)
On 12-5-2016 20:18, liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support] wrote:
> This detection is useless .
> use the latest library (FB3) and you can connect to any older servers
But that isn't really useful if you
Hi,
>>SS FB 3.0 takes different query plan than SC 2.5.2, it slows because not use
>>index.
will be good to see query, query plan in both FB versions – if you need help
you must help others to help you (with exact info).
Also will be good to see indexes and its statistics
regards,
Karol
Hi,
1=1 => true
“where true” is always true
this is oposite to 1=0 => false
and this statements are equal:
update stock set actualizar = 0 where 1=1;
update stock set actualizar = 0;
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016
Hi,
1. will be good to see this query plans
2. will be good to see exact error message
3. also check your db by gfix –validate –full
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 8:35 AM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
Hi,
i do not understand what you try to do (why you need to set value of get max in
procedure) but:
gen_id(generator_name, –gen_id(generator_name, 0)+your_get_max_value)
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2016 6:40 PM
To:
Hi,
one of possible reason is that records are not visible to transaction with this
update statement.
e.g.
1. you start transansction (tr1)
2. someone start transaction 2(tr2)
3. tr2 insert some records
4. tr1 run update
5. tr2 commit
6. tr1 commit
all records inserted by tr2 are not updated
Hi,
i am talking about your post
“I don't have the SQL standard at hand right now, so I can't double
check. As far as I know, the SQL standard allows you to sort on any
field, even if it is not in the select list (with the exception of
course of ordering by column index).”
and about line
Hi,
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-742
i do not need to spam tracker then i move discussion to group.
Please disscuss/vote on exception handling mechanism related to udf call.
I can only say that crashing engine becouse udf raise exception is wrong at all.
This mechanism can
Hi,
i test this on virtual machine with Windows 2008R2 and Xeon E5-2680 v2 and
result was:
Executing statement...
Statement executed (elapsed time: 0.000s).
10899160 fetches, 1051082 marks, 0 reads, 69 writes.
4 inserts, 950001 updates, 0 deletes, 950016 index, 2 seq.
Delta memory:
Hi,
i work with big csv files and to speed up operations i convert it do external
table format with my tool.
It convert all fields types and work fast
but may be in Firebird 3 are some improvements?
Maybe this step is now unnecessary?
Can we separate csv file on the fly in FB proc? and loop
Hi,
this is simple - but i do not know how many values you have
if this is small count then
select
Fields
FROM
TABLE_NAME
ORDER BY CASE WHEN ID=1032 THEN 1 WHEN ID=624 THEN 2 WHEN ID=2841 THEN 3 END
and if this is big numer then add better temp table with order values
regards,
Karol
Hi,
is there some difference in meaning between this two
SELECT DISTINCT R.RDB$FIELD_ID, R.RDB$RELATION_NAME FROM RDB$RELATIONS R
and this
SELECT DISTINCT(R.RDB$FIELD_ID), R.RDB$RELATION_NAME FROM RDB$RELATIONS R
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
Thanks all,
i forgot about another locales like Sunday first day.
I see that supporting official function in FB will be problematic
then i do this in this way
SELECT
EXTRACT(YEAR FROM FLD_DATE),
CASE
WHEN EXTRACT(yearday FROM FLD_DATE)100 AND EXTRACT(WEEK FROM FLD_DATE)50
THEN 0
Hi,
i know this kind of cast
SELECT CAST('1.23' AS NUMERIC(10, 2)) FROM RDB$DATABASE
but what are the rules for this (numeric without parenthesis)
[1]
SELECT CAST('1.23' AS NUMERIC) FROM RDB$DATABASE
result is 1
[2]
SELECT CAST('12345678.23' as numeric) FROM RDB$DATABASE
result is 12345678
then why here is an error?
SELECT CAST('123456789.23' as numeric) FROM RDB$DATABASE
result should be 123 456 789 is less then 2 147 483 647
i assume this, because this working:
SELECT CAST('12345678.23' as numeric) FROM RDB$DATABASE
SELECT CAST('123456789' as numeric) FROM RDB$DATABASE
PS.
Hi,
is possible to get week of the year within year?
I see that built in functions only support ISO-8601 (or i do not know some
parameter)
SELECT '2014-12-31', EXTRACT(WEEK FROM CAST('2014-12-31' AS DATE)) FROM
RDB$DATABASE
result is 1 but i need weeks in year -in example 53
you know
when
Hello Vlad,
is there a location where I can download a win64 installer package of a nightly
build including the fix, or when will 2.5.5 be released officially?
Would need this for automatic installation.
--
Joja
Von: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com]
W dniu 2015-06-10 14:30:52 użytkownik 'Jojakim Stahl' joja.li...@jojakim.de
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com napisał:
is there a location where I can download a win64 installer package of a
nightly build including the fix, or when will 2.5.5 be released officially?
W dniu 2015-06-25 09:18:48 użytkownik josef.gschwendt...@quattro-soft.de
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com napisał:
Hi,
I have a table with one ID-Column and one Sort-Column.
I need the ID from the record with the lowest sort-number.
Sortnumbers are not unique (can be
Hi,
why concating blob consume memory and not leave it until transaction end?
simple sample
SET TERM ^ ;
CREATE PROCEDURE TEST_BLOB_CONCAT
( A BLOB SUB_TYPE TEXT, ILE INTEGER )
RETURNS
( B BLOB SUB_TYPE TEXT )
AS
DECLARE VARIABLE VAR_I INTEGER;
BEGIN
VAR_I = 0;
B = 'ABC';
W dniu 2015-06-23 10:38:25 użytkownik brucedickin...@wp.pl [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com napisał:
Hello guys,
today I've stumbled on some strange (in my opinion) behaviour.
Firstly, create these two structures:
CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE GLB_CS_TEMP
(
W dniu 2015-06-24 09:51:58 użytkownik Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com napisał:
At 07:27 p.m. 24/06/2015, liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
[firebird-support] wrote:
why concating blob consume memory and not leave it until
W dniu 2015-06-24 11:56:28 użytkownik Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com napisał:
At 08:03 p.m. 24/06/2015, liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
[firebird-support] wrote:
Hi Hellen,
it looks like bug is not fixed only minimized?
I
Hi,
why concating blob consume memory and not leave it until transaction end?
simple sample
SET TERM ^ ;
CREATE PROCEDURE TEST_BLOB_CONCAT
( A BLOB SUB_TYPE TEXT, ILE INTEGER )
RETURNS
( B BLOB SUB_TYPE TEXT )
AS
DECLARE VARIABLE VAR_I INTEGER;
BEGIN
VAR_I = 0;
B = 'ABC';
You forwarded it to firebird-support, not to firebird-devel.
Mark
Fixed ;-)
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
Hi,
what is the proper way for copy data from big table to another database
if table is bigger then avaiable RAM and we need to do this in one transaction?
You know if we do
SELECT * FROM SOURCE_TABLE - and table have e.g. 400 000 000 records
then retrive it is impossible because of RAM
but if
You asked something similar 2 years ago:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.firebird.user/7145
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com/
Sorry for off-top but
I'am very interested what jack.mason will say about this :
You have my +1 ;-)
regards,
Karol
Hi,
the real question is in point 4
tables
CREATE TABLE TABLEX
(FIELD_ID INTEGER
);
CREATE TABLE TABLEY
(
ID INTEGER,
AAA INTEGER
);
CREATE TABLE TABLEZ
(
ID INTEGER,
BBB INTEGER
);
few thinks:
1. If i do something like this
SELECT (SELECT P.SUM_AAA FROM MY_PROC_CALC(T.FIELD_ID) P) FROM
Here you change the SQL for each iteration, hence I cannot see how it would
be possible to prepare only once. What you could try, is to use a temporary
table, change your statement to:
Simple if after iteration query look like
SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE ID=?
SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE ID=? OR
Hi,
this is simple with case or iif
this run ok
SELECT CASE WHEN CAST('123.00' AS INTEGER)CAST('123.00' AS NUMERIC(18, 3))
THEN CAST('PRECISION LOST' AS INTEGER) ELSE CAST('123.456' AS INTEGER) END FROM
RDB$DATABASE
this run with an error conversion error from string PRECISION LOST FOR
Hi,
query like this
SELECT DISTINCT T.FIELD_1 FROM TEST T ORDER By T.FIELD_2, T.FIELD_1
from where Firebird get info about T.FIELD_2 in order by if it applied first
DISTINCT (unique sort)?
i run this also on FB3 to get more info from explained plan
Select Expression
- Sort (record
Hi,
First show us query plan for every select from this proc. This tell us what is
wrong.
Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: 'stwizard' stwiz...@att.net [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Data: 13.08.2015 15:19 (GMT+01:00)
Do:
Hi,
What about triggers?
Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: 'Walter R. Ojeda Valiente' sistemas2000profesio...@gmail.com
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Data: 06.08.2015 20:12 (GMT+01:00)
Do: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Hi,
Why do you need to go back?
Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: 'Neil Pickles' neil.pick...@csy.co.uk [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Data: 04.08.2015 00:34 (GMT+01:00)
Do: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Temat:
hi,
you should identity this long running transaction. if you use fb2.5 than this
is simple by mon$TRANSACTIONS table
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "lizwatson02...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]"
Data: 21.10.2015
Hi,
how do you tried to connect (by which connectivity driver/component)?
I remember that there was some limitation in some version of drivers.
If you have professional version of Delphi then you cannot connect to Interbase
remotely. This was changed later..
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
W
Hi,
but you can backup this database and move it to another computer :)
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
W dniu 2015-11-11 15:36:54 użytkownik Virgo Pärna virgo.pa...@mail.ee
[firebird-support] napisał:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:23:51 +0300, Alexey Kovyazin
hi,
you got an error or what?
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "'stwizard' stwiz...@att.net [firebird-support]"
Data: 03.11.2015 14:59 (GMT+01:00)
Do: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Temat: [firebird-support]
hi,
do you connect by 127.0.0.1 or address like 10.10.1.5. if second and this
adderss is local computer ip then this can be also by network problem affected.
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support]"
Hi,
you have few ways
1. EXECUTE BLOCK and there for select and delete
2. Temp Table
3. speed up subselect with expression index on
Upper(Trim(MBH.HEADER_BOOK_CODE))
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
W dniu 2015-10-14 11:21:44 użytkownik Vishal Tiwari vishuals...@yahoo.co.in
Hi,
For superserver this should be as high as possible. Why you recommended 1
value? I always set it to highest possible value in current environment
compared to size of database. And i always disable system cache
Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od:
Hi,
The same message i saw in the past when someone try to connect with interbase
client
Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "soprano...@yahoo.com.ar [firebird-support]"
Data: 10.09.2015 00:18 (GMT+01:00)
Do:
Hi,
i do not know if you describe your problem precisely.
But i understand it like this:
looks like you need all leaf from same parent (with parent included) as is for
"Vishal Group1" and all its childs
try this
WITH RECURSIVE
G1_PARENT AS
(
SELECT MGP.DESCRIPTION FROM MYGROUP MG INNER
hi,
i do not understand you corectly...but.
install firebird on both (on first is required on second only client) put this
db on pc with fb server and connect from both or more pc.this is normal setup
of any rdbms. only port 3050 must be unblocked
Regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
hi,
did you try select instead of update to see if select return all records which
you try to update?
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "Sonya Blade sonyablade2...@hotmail.com [firebird-support]"
Data: 02.01.2016
hi,
what error you get in the first steep that you try using -fix_fss_metadata
switch?
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "ruri...@yahoo.es [firebird-support]"
Data: 27.11.2015 09:01 (GMT+01:00)
Do:
hi,
modification datetime is not enaugh to replication. think about
1. transaction started and modify data2. synchronization started and fetch data
from last modifird datetime3. synchronization end4. transaction commit data
from point 1 and store datetime before synch started5.
Hi,
what is OF and three dots after?
FOR UPDATE [OF ...]] WITH LOCK
(README.explicit_locks)
it looks like we can write after OF something more - but what?
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
Hi,
what are + and – with working with schema?
What benefits are between
schema_name__table_name and real schema implementation?
schema_name.table_name
I near to always have worked without schema databases or with only one schema
in schema supported databases.
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
Hi,
thanks you Paul
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:03 AM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [firebird-support] FOR UPDATE [OF ...]] WITH LOCK
<>
"The clause can take an optional OF to target
Hi,
test without details say nothing to me
1. Did you compare results with e.g. FB2.5 in on the same maschine with same
configuration (FBConfig)
2. What is your page size and type of HDD?
3. Do you have BOST feature enabled on CPU and HT?
4. Did you compare results on GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE - i
SP plans (SP's called by
the SP which you are converting to an execute block).
Att.
João Paulo
--
DE: "liviuslivius liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl [firebird-support]"
<firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
Hi,
yes but this was "wrong"
Consider this:
inside procedure you have 5 different statements
and you run query and only two of them are reached - do you really need to see
all 5?
Ok - now you got only "natural" word for procedure - i do not know if this is
better now..
But if you need plan
Hi,
anybody?
regars,
Karol Bieniaszewski
W dniu 2016-06-12 23:18:15 użytkownik livius
napisał:
Hi,
what are + and – with working with schema?
What benefits are between
schema_name__table_name and real schema implementation?
schema_name.table_name
I near to
hi,
two things1. try latest FB version in part, you have 2.5.4 but there is 2.5.6
or newer2. 20 GB is small try to restore this db on normal PC if server have
only 20GB free.
ps. in FB3 transaction id is int64 - no more problems :)
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Hi,
you have right Paul and Stefan
sorry for previous answer - i miss that point
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
W dniu 2016-06-16 11:03:25 użytkownik Paul Vinkenoog p...@vinkenoog.nl
[firebird-support] napisał:
Hi Stefan,
> > Also, it is questionable if
Hi,
you use wrong collation
UNICODE_CI is truly case-insensitive. In a search for e.g. 'Apple', it will
also find 'apple', 'APPLE' and 'aPPLe'.
UNICODE_CI_AI is accent-insensitive as well. According to this collation,
'APPEL' equals 'Appèl'.
as you can see UNICODE_CI_AI is accent-insensitive
Hi,
thank you Dmitry – the last sentens show me some benefits
other sentenses show only complications for me.
we can write sql like
select * from table_name but really this is
select * from schema.table_name
and if i write this in stored procedure – i suppose that “object_id” will be
stored in
pluses?
Firebird has no support for schemas, IIRC... or am I missing something?
Em dom, 12 de jun de 2016 às 18:18, 'livius' liviusliv...@poczta.onet.pl
[firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> escreveu:
Hi,
what are + and – with working with schema?
What be
Hi,
do you mean that you share one connection between multiple threads?
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 5:55 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [firebird-support] performance issue with firebird 3.0
Hi,
error message?
regards,
Karol Bieniaszewski
From: mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 6:39 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [firebird-support] It works on FB 2.5 but does not work in FB 1.5
I created a view that works perfectly on FB
hi,
by what software/driver do you try to connect. did you try connecting by
isql?If you can not connect by isql then i suppose password was changed
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "Jianbo Li l...@stunningtech.com [firebird-support]"
Ok i then misunderstand some discussion obout increasing length of identifiers
to support then schemas
Now i understand that this is only minor preparation
regards,
karol Bieniaszewski
W dniu 2016-06-15 23:36:56 użytkownik Dmitry Yemanov
dim...@users.sourceforge.net [firebird-support]
>>In this case, user1 does not know about user2. They live in two parallel
>>universes.
>>Dmitry
Then i do not know who can take risk that user1 in one "universe" (product) at
present day have e.g. two schemas and user2 have onother schema
and in the future user2 take decision to create another
Hello Karol,
Thursday, June 16, 2016, 7:49:06 AM, you wrote:
>
> but this feature is considered for FB4 – then i need to know why this is
> important feature..
>
This whole topic is off-topic in firebird-support, which is about
current releases.
However, I'm sure others (including me) are
hi,
better is expression index here
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "Svein Erling Tysvær setys...@gmail.com [firebird-support]"
Data: 12.02.2016 08:52 (GMT+01:00)
Do: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Temat: Re:
hi,
as Helen sayyou must commit previous transaction not close connection
regards,Karol Bieniaszewski
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: "'Andrew Zenz' and...@aimsoftware.com.au [firebird-support]"
Data: 04.02.2016 05:55 (GMT+01:00)
Do:
1 - 100 of 519 matches
Mail list logo