The Firefox dev tools has ruined my development. Now I need to find a new
browser to develop one. Sad day.
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 2:42:32 AM UTC-5, Matthew McRae wrote:
>
> One thing that seems to be missing is the autocomplete when making CSS
> changes.
>
> When I would begin
I cannot use this new tool at all. Where is the side by side console that
allowed multiple line script and loading of scripts from history? I have
been using this tool since it's inception and now we are forced to use a
different browser.
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 4:53:19 PM UTC-5,
1. Type it into the command line:
SubmitNewsletter
2. SubmitNewsletter() will appear in the console as a green text.
3. Click on it.
4. The script Tab will open with the SubmitNewsletter function in view.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Bill K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re-sending -
It would be useful to edit the stylesheet selector text.
I would like to add a rule and then be able to remove that rule.
The feature would be part of the context menu in the css tab.
Garrett
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
Any Javascript object with 'length' and 'splice' should format as an
array. If not please report a bug.
Using Firebug 1.2.1, an object with properties |length| and |splice|
is not formatted the same as an Array.
{} === Object
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:28 PM, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
Any Javascript object with 'length' and 'splice' should format as an
array. If not please report a bug.
Using
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:05 AM, JFKelley jfk...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be nice to have a navigation pane that had a list of
functions as hyperlinks to navigate me directly there instead of
having to search for function myFunction.
It would fit nicely as a tab over in the pane that
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Kara Rawsonkaracu...@gmail.com wrote:
sir_brizz wrote:
On Jul 17, 9:50 am, Kirby ki...@wallaceinfo.com wrote:
[snip nonsensical rambling]
Firebug is free and the guys are working on it between mails like this one.
Threads like these take time away from JJB
On 7/25/09, judgej jud...@gmail.com wrote:
I upgraded to FF 3.5 from 3.0.x ... bad move.
It forced me to move to FB 1.4.x or greater.
Now, I have blank (see pict) or crunched up firebug panes.
If I do a separate FB window, its the same.
I moved to 1.5 to see if there was any relief --
When a javascript breakpoint is reached, and Firebug is closed, should
Firebug open to that point?
In 1.4X.0, Firebug stays closed
I think that Firebug should instead open to the breakpoint, but I may
be wrong. What do others think?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
silent.
I agree, however,
Using Firebug 1.4X.0:-
0) document with script in HEAD
1) set a breakpoint
2) close FB
3) execute the page
Result:
page halts and Firebug does not open.
jjb
Garrett
On Jul 27, 8:48 pm, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
When a javascript breakpoint
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 1:00 PM, johnjbartonjohnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 11:27 am, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:37 PM, johnjbartonjohnjbar...@johnjbarton.com
wrote:
On Aug 18, 12:34 pm, Bob Hassinger r.hassin...@ieee.org wrote
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Maltemalte@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 2, 4:34 am, Luke Maurer luke.v.mau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 7:50 pm, Nicolas Hatier nicolas.hat...@gmail.com wrote:
[posting order restored]
You can use this syntax:
functioncompose (fn1, fn2) {
// returns
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:20 AM, johnjbartonjohnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Sep 7, 9:00 pm, crunchyt paulchap...@gmail.com wrote:
I vote for a return to simpler activation control.
We know now that activation in 1.4 has a bug. A beta version of 1.4.3
will be out soon.
When
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:29 PM, jc crowleymarket...@gmail.com wrote:
what do you want to know?
Which extensions you have. The platform, the version of Firebug.
Version of Firefox.
Include the steps you performed, e.g.
1) launch firefox
2) tools add ons.
3) etc...
Typical stuff in a bug
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Dale Larsen dalelarse...@gmail.com wrote:
Under the script tab you can choose which scripts you want to look at/
debug. I am programming a rather complicated user interface that has
popups, panels, all the magic stuff.
jQuery?
I use AJAX to get files and load
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:47 AM, sam vince.sear...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm new to Firebug but I'm sure there is a simple solution to my
question.
I wish to remove some HTML from my web page - with Firebug I can
easily identify the element I need to remove but when it comes to me
looking
The console has a run button - is there a command for it?
Incidentally, has anyone been able to use keyboard shortcut ACCEL +
Shift + l to draw focus to the command line?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Firebug group.
To post to this group, send
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Pedro Simonetti Garcia
pedrosimone...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Garret,
2010/5/16 Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com:
The console has a run button - is there a command for it?
It seems you're talking about the large command line. By command you
mean a shortcut
On 5/29/10, Mike Ratcliffe mich...@ratcliffefamily.org wrote:
I don't think it is possible to move the mouse cursor, but I think
that if we added a freeze / thaw button and used a keyboard shortcut
then we would be adding the commonly requested freeze / thaw and it
would solve this problem. We
On 5/29/10, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
Overall this sounds like issue 2638.
http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2638
No, that looks totally different.
THe OP wants to inspect an element while the cursor is over it.
THe problem is that you can't do that; once
When inspecting an element, it would be useful to have a feature of
the DOM tab to add a new property.
The MSIE developer toolbar has such feature and it is useful.
The feature could be presented in teh context menu and might also be
presented as it is in MSIE developer toolbar, by having a
DOne.http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=3113
On 6/1/10, Honza (Jan Odvarko) odva...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like a great idea to me!
Please report a new bug and I'll take a look at it
http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list
Honza
On Jun 1, 9:59 am, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc
On 6/2/10, gswkaiser w.kai...@fortune.de wrote:
On 1 Jun., 09:59, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
When inspecting an element, it would be useful to have a feature of
the DOM tab to add a new property.
The MSIE developer toolbar has such feature and it is useful.
The feature
developer toolbar.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 6/2/10, gswkaiser w.kai...@fortune.de wrote:
On 1 Jun., 09:59, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
When inspecting an element, it would be useful to have a feature of
the DOM tab to add
On 6/2/10, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 4:52 pm, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/2/10, Jaime Bueza jbu...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
That was one proposal. The other idea is to have a blank property
field at the end of the list where you can type
On 7/30/10, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Jul 30, 10:00 am, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/29/10, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 5:39 am, Prefontim prefon...@hotmail.com wrote:
I would agree with the general tenor
On 8/29/10, booksort froo...@booksort.com wrote:
You know how a minor typo can sometimes stop JavaScript working
completely, with no clues to the cause? There will probably just be an
'undefined' error somewhere else. It may take hours to spot the
mistake.
I've been got more than once after
On 8/29/10, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
foo.concat(bar, bang, 12, true);
Concatenates the string it is called on with the arguments it is
passed, converting all to strings resulting:
foobarbang12true
Garrett
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On 9/27/10, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
I think the comic would have been much more interesting if the
character in the middle with the green shirt had been female. The
comic aspect would be the same, but the culturally effect would have
been much more positive. We have
On 10/17/10, Steve Hueners am.st...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working with a page where i'm including the new jQuery release - 1.4.3
but when i click 'jQuerify' i'm told 'This page is already using jQuery
1.4.1'. Is there any chance i have to cache weirdness going on or should i
just ignore the
consider how to refactor to remove dependency on it,
considering deadline, impact of the change, etc.
thx
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Garrett Smith
dhtmlkitc...@gmail.comwrote:
On 10/17/10, Steve Hueners am.st...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working with a page where i'm including the new
On 10/18/10, Sebo sebastianzart...@gmx.de wrote:
There should never be dependency on any JavaScript. A website also has
to work with deactivated JavaScript.
@Garret: So your statement, that jQuery is crap in this meaning is
unfounded.
It certainly is not! I've read quite enough code reviews
On 10/19/10, Nicolas Hatier nicolas.hat...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we stop debating the relevancy of JQuery here, please?
The original question was about a compatibility issue between the latest
jQuery and the latest Firebug with the FireQuery extension, not about
the use of jQuery itself.
I just installed Firebug 1.6 and it seems to be overriding our try/
catch error handling code. This is basically code that catches the
error and does a console.log of the error object. But now instead the
console in Firebug is stopping at the error and displaying the error
message that links to
needed.
On Dec 1, 9:43 am, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 6:45 am, Steve Smith slsmit...@gmail.com wrote:
I just installed Firebug 1.6 and it seems to be overriding our try/
catch error handling code. This is basically code that catches the
error and does
.
Nak1
On Dec 1, 9:43 am, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 6:45 am, Steve Smith slsmit...@gmail.com wrote:
I just installed Firebug 1.6 and it seems to be overriding our try/
catch error handling code. This is basically code that catches the
error
of displaying the stack trace than the console.log did.
On Dec 1, 2:46 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
Ok now I see what you mean. The representation we use for the object
changed. What don't you like about the new representation?
jjb
On Dec 1, 12:33 pm, Steve Smith slsmit
Hi,
When running Firebug, I get the error message:
Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element true Window Mouse-test.html
The only way I've found to make the error stop happening is to close the tab.
Does anybody know what the cause of this error is?
Garrett
--
You received this message
On 12/12/10, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
Which version ? I don't see that message in the 1.7 code.
v 1.5.4.
Can you tell us how to reproduce this?
I don't know how to reproduce it.
--
Garrett
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hey I wanna debug some crap.
It is crap that I didn't write. It's online and minified.
I wanna see the source code beautified and I wanna add a breakpoints
to statements. Firebug should offer this because it would make it
possible to debug minifed obfuscated code. It will help anyone who
wants
On 1/27/11, Nicolas Hatier nicolas.hat...@gmail.com wrote:
Mid-line breakpoints will be very useful.
Yeah. I was thinking of that as feature break on statement.
However, for minified content, unpacking could also be a must, as code
like this is hard to follow, even with mid-line breakpoints:
Hi,
Hope you are doing well today,
This is Steven Smith from Panzer Solutions looking for Tomcat/Apache
Webserver Engineer for our client in Columbus, Ohio,Please let me know if
you have anyone available for the below position.
*Job Title : Tomcat/Apache Webserver Engineer
Duration : 6
Hi *Business Partner,*
Hope you are doing well today,
This is *Steven Smith* from *Panzer Solutions* looking for *Java
Developer*for our client in
*Wilmington, DE(Loca)*. Please let me know if you have anyone available for
the below position.
*Job Title : Java Developer
Location : Wilmington
On Friday, January 8, 2010 4:58:23 PM UTC-6, Steven Roussey wrote:
What is Show chrome sources? I don't seem to see any difference with
the option on or off.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Firebug group.
To post to this group, send email to
hi,thank you for all you do to keep my computer safe. i am the sole user of
this of this computer. i'm 55 years old adult content is okay for me.
thanks again.
On Friday, January 8, 2010 4:58:23 PM UTC-6, Steven Roussey wrote:
What is Show chrome sources? I don't seem to see any difference
I am having the same issue. Firebug causes my Ext app to go haywire. My app
is using Ext 3.2, but is also a variable called batch that seems to be
messing it up.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Firebug group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Sorry I meant to say that our app uses Ext 3.4, not Ext 3.2
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Firebug group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this
go
away.
Sincerely,
David Smith
Virtuluxe
310 625 7696
On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Erik Krause <erik.kra...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 08.12.2016 um 18:21 schrieb sm...@virtuluxe.com:
>
> The Firefox dev tools has ruined my development. Now I need to find a new
>> browser
49 matches
Mail list logo
