Hi Fisers,
(1) I have been workign with the so-called Planckain Distribution Eqauiton
(PDE) that fits almost all long-tailed histograms generated in many fields of
natural and human sciences, including atomic physics, protein folding, cell
metabolism, decision making, glottometrics, econometr
18 sep. 2017 kl. 18:25 skrev Terrence W. DEACON
mailto:dea...@berkeley.edu>>:
All of these claims and counter-claims are null hypotheses - hypothetical
axioms yet to be tested, both for logical coherence and empirical usefulness.
Place your bets. Mine are on contrary assumptions: i.e. non-Turi
On 18 Sep 2017, at 18:25, Terrence W. DEACON wrote:
All of these claims and counter-claims are null hypotheses -
hypothetical axioms yet to be tested, both for logical coherence and
empirical usefulness. Place your bets. Mine are on contrary
assumptions: i.e. non-Turing computability, fund
All of these claims and counter-claims are null hypotheses - hypothetical
axioms yet to be tested, both for logical coherence and empirical
usefulness. Place your bets. Mine are on contrary assumptions: i.e.
non-Turing computability, fundamental incompleteness, and a deep
entanglement between infor
Dear Jose,
On 15 Sep 2017, at 16:37, Jose Javier Blanco Rivero wrote:
Dear Arturo,
Math is indeed a language that CAN describe scientific issues, but
it is not the only one. And its ability to cuantify scientific
issues do not necesarily make it superior.
Math and natural language face the
Dear Arturo,
On 15 Sep 2017, at 15:16, tozziart...@libero.it wrote:
Dear FISers,
I'm sorry for bothering you,
but I start not to agree from the very first principles.
The only language able to describe and quantify scientific issues is
mathematics.
Without math, you do not have observables,
