Cari Steven Ericsson-Zenith, Pedro e Tutti,
proprio da qualche mese ho iniziato a scrivere un libro in cui, fra
l'altro, affronto ancora una volta il tema dell'informazione dell'armonia o
dell'armonia dell'informazione. Specialmente in questi giorni, dopo avere
passato in rassegna le diverse teorie
In a message dated 9/11/2015 8:15:48 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es writes:
Dear Steven and FIS colleagues,
Many thanks for this opening text. What you are proposing about a pretty
structured discussion looks a good idea, although it will have to
confront the usual
I'll have to weigh in with Stan on this one. Stan earlier had defined
information more generally as "constraint". It is convenient to employ the
IT calculus to separate constraint from indeterminacy. This is possible in
complete abstraction from anything to do with communication.
The ability to ma
Dear Steven, Pedro and List:
Two excellent posts!
Steven: I look forward to your ratiocinations and there connectivity with
symbolic logic.
It is my view that one of the foundational stumbling blocks to communication
about syntactical information theory (and its exactness!) is the multi-mean
Pedro wrote"
>Most attempts to enlarge informational thought and to extend it to life,
economies, societies, etc. continue to be but a reformulation of the former
ideas with little added value.
S: Well, I have generalized the Shannon concept of information carrying
capacity under 'variety'... {v
Dear Steven and FIS colleagues,
Many thanks for this opening text. What you are proposing about a pretty
structured discussion looks a good idea, although it will have to
confront the usually anarchic discussion style of FIS list! Two aspects
of your initial text have caught my attention (apart f
