On 11 Feb 2013, at 18:38, John Collier wrote:
> I guess I am at a loss to see them as separate
> discourses.
Me too. Actually I do not believe in something like *Science*. But I
do believe in the human *scientific attitude*, and I have eventually
realized that such attitude is totally domai
Dear Friends - etymology might be of some help in responding to Steven's
question, "When you say "philosophers" do you mean "theorists?" And, if not,
what distinguishes the two?" The philosopher is a lover of wisdom and
philosophy is the love of wisdom. The theorist is the one that sees. Theory
John,
When you say "philosophers" do you mean "theorists?" And, if not, what
distinguishes the two?
What would "a philosophical component" of information theory look like? Does
such a component simply speak about the existential status of information? Is
there some epistemology involved? Are
I guess I am at a loss to see them as separate
discourses. Especially in the domain of Information.
Contrary to what Stan said, I think that many of
the major advances in science from Statistical
Mechanics, to Relativity Theory to Quantum
Mechanics did and continue to have a major
philosophi
7;Pedro C. Marijuan'",
Betreff: Re: [Fis] [Fwd: SV: Science, Philosophy and Information. An
Alternative Relation] S.Brier
How does one measure the synergy among three discourses?
That is an interesting question within information theory (as part of both
science and philosophy).
Best
How does one measure the synergy among three discourses?
That is an interesting question within information theory (as part of both
science and philosophy).
Best,
Loet
-Original Message-
From: fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On
Behalf Of Pedro C. Marij
Søren -- Your "science without philosophy" is what we have mostly been
having since the industrial revolution. In this period sciences has mostly
been the handmaid of engineering and technology, following Francis Bacon's
recommendation. Now that our culture has captured and partly destroyed
much
