google bots follow links. like i said before look at the swfaddress SEO
stuff to get started. as long as what google finds at
yoursite.com/section/is the same content you deliver in your flash
when you go directly to
yoursite.com/section/ then there is no foul play going on.
it's not doubling up e
On 20/04/2010 22:51, Dave Watts wrote:
In the case that Flash is driven by dynamic content dependent on user
interaction, I don't see how such a criteria of "similar content" can
reasonably be applied.
Most web applications that I work on, that have HTML interfaces, also
have dynamic conte
> In the case that Flash is driven by dynamic content dependent on user
> interaction, I don't see how such a criteria of "similar content" can
> reasonably be applied.
Most web applications that I work on, that have HTML interfaces, also
have dynamic content. Presumably, you'd have the same dynam
On 20/04/2010 21:37, Dave Watts wrote:
Isn't that kind of thing considered "unfair" play and penalized by search
engines if discovered?
It depends on how it's done, exactly. If you have very similar content
within Flash and within the alternative HTML you serve, it's not
considered "cloaki
Has anybody made the seekBar UI component work when a FLVPlayback goes to full
screen mode? Google comes up with a lot of people having the problems, but have
not found a solution that works for me.
This is the precise problem I'm having:
http://www.actionscript.org/forums/showthread.php3?p=706
Wired magazine says Flash will be viable for a long time, isn't going
away anytime soon. They discuss HTML5/Apple/Silverlight and more:
http://www.webmonkey.com/2010/04/flash-faces-down-threats-on-adobes-big-
day/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2F
software%2Fcoola
I think it depends on what industry you're in, but generally a developer
should know how to do a lot of things and not just specialize in one
thing. If you only know Flash, and it goes away then you're out of luck.
Rather you show know Flash, Javascript, HTML, CSS, etc. You can
specialize in F
> Isn't that kind of thing considered "unfair" play and penalized by search
> engines if discovered?
It depends on how it's done, exactly. If you have very similar content
within Flash and within the alternative HTML you serve, it's not
considered "cloaking":
http://www.cnet.com/8301-13530_1-9748
Hi Folks!
This is my first message in this forum
Im a Brazillian Flash developer and i'd like to ask you about the future of
Flash platform.
Few times ago I became a little worried about the increasing of css/xhtml
web sites instead of flash websites. Actually I can sae many sites that
before
On 20/04/2010 20:06, jonathan howe wrote:
Paul,
That's an interesting distinction. Does the agreement say you can't even
test locally those kind of prototypes? I thought the blocking was just for
distribution through the store.
-jonathan
As I understand it the new developer agreement makes
The "Testing" install on a provisioned device is also time limited. ( I
bring this up because my touch just informed me I had 30 days before my
Client's app provision expired ).
Jer
On 20/04/2010 15:31, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) wrote:
sure but you can compile to your own handset
Paul,
That's an interesting distinction. Does the agreement say you can't even
test locally those kind of prototypes? I thought the blocking was just for
distribution through the store.
-jonathan
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:57 AM, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) <
alla...@gmail.com> wro
^ this
On 20 April 2010 18:12, Henrik Andersson wrote:
> Ryan P wrote:
>
>> I am kinda new to this listing thing. I am on here cause a friend of my
>> uses
>> this for help with AS3. Is there a faq about how this works, so I don't
>> waste anyones time..
>>
>> Thanks!!
>>
>>
> Just one rule: don
i've never seen one specifically made for flash - my guess is that you'll
need to create an interface for something xml based
a
On 20 April 2010 17:40, Steve Klein wrote:
> Hello, All-
>I don't want to bomb the list with info that's probably been covered
> to death, but I'm having limit
Ryan P wrote:
I am kinda new to this listing thing. I am on here cause a friend of my uses
this for help with AS3. Is there a faq about how this works, so I don't
waste anyones time..
Thanks!!
Just one rule: don't do like the ignorant people bellow and reply when
you mean to create a new top
This isn't really a Flash/ActionScript related question.
There are tons of payment gateways, e.g. authroize.net. All of the ones I
know require backend code to work.
Taka
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Steve Klein wrote:
> Hello, All-
>I don't want to bomb the list with info that's p
Hello, All-
I don't want to bomb the list with info that's probably been covered to
death, but I'm having limited success in finding a cart/merchant processing
solution that will be seamless in an AS3 site.
If anyone could recommend a cart/payment processing solution that
includ
Peter B wrote:
> if you just moved from a third-world country and promised the client a huge
> ecommerce flash site and usually hire russian flash devs but don't have any
> contacts now and don't have money for a book then i would advise against
> posting.
LMAO! Where's Beno when you need him?
C
that's the problem with apple's closed system - it's their way or the high
way
android supports both models - you can put your software in their appstore
or provide a direct link on the net
a
On 20 April 2010 15:46, Paul Andrews wrote:
> On 20/04/2010 15:31, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.
DOH! ;)
on 4/19/10 8:32 PM, jared stanley at jared.stan...@gmail.com wrote:
> if you just moved from a third-world country and promised the client a huge
> ecommerce flash site and usually hire russian flash devs but don't have any
> contacts now and don't have money for a book then i would ad
On 20/04/2010 15:31, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) wrote:
sure but you can compile to your own handset for testing as much as you like
- it just won't get through the appstore approval process
"testing" isn't much use to me. I can't build software for internal use
at a company on
sure but you can compile to your own handset for testing as much as you like
- it just won't get through the appstore approval process
On 20 April 2010 15:24, Paul Andrews wrote:
> On 20/04/2010 15:01, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) wrote:
>
>> note: to roll out an app to your dev ha
On 20/04/2010 15:01, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) wrote:
note: to roll out an app to your dev handset requires a 100$
iphone developer license
Which now forbids you to use the Adobe cross compiler. You have to agree
to those terms.
___
On 20/04/2010 15:00, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) wrote:
any developer can add an app to their phone through the compilation options
from xcode using the sdk but there's no way i know of rolling this out to
the public.
i think for what you want, going through the cydia (
http://www.ap
note: to roll out an app to your dev handset requires a 100$
iphone developer license
On 20 April 2010 15:00, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com) <
alla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> any developer can add an app to their phone through the compilation options
> from xcode using the sdk but there's
any developer can add an app to their phone through the compilation options
from xcode using the sdk but there's no way i know of rolling this out to
the public.
i think for what you want, going through the cydia (
http://www.appsafari.com/software/5325/cydia/) store on jailbroken phones /
pods is
They would have to be jailbreaked (jailbroken?) iPhones to run that. All
apps require a digital certificate, which is managed through their developer
program to be loaded onto the phone and run. The type of certificate
controls whether how they can be distributed. Non store-distributed apps are
res
There is an enterprise version of the SDK that allows app distribution via
your own servers (effectively replacing the app store). We looked at this
for a state agency wanting to distribute apps to their employees.
http://developer.apple.com/programs/iphone/enterprise/
The "Ad Hoc" distribution o
If the Agreement doesnt currently prevent it, you can be quite certain
a couple sentences would be added in a hurry to make sure it does.
.m
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Nathan Mynarcik wrote:
> Come to think of it, I wonder if you could just make a website for support
> and download of you
On 20/04/2010 13:46, Nathan Mynarcik wrote:
Come to think of it, I wonder if you could just make a website for support and
download of your app. Sell it on the site via Paypal or a shopping cart. Can
Apple prevent developers from doing this?
Nathan Mynarcik
Interactive Web Developer
nat...@myna
pretty sure you can't do that
On 20 April 2010 14:46, Nathan Mynarcik wrote:
> Come to think of it, I wonder if you could just make a website for support
> and download of your app. Sell it on the site via Paypal or a shopping cart.
> Can Apple prevent developers from doing this?
> Nathan Mynar
This is true. If for some reason google thinks you are trying to advance your
rank by wrongful ways (to their discretion) you get flagged.
Nathan Mynarcik
Interactive Web Developer
nat...@mynarcik.com
254.749.2525
www.mynarcik.com
-Original Message-
From: tom rhodes
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 20
Come to think of it, I wonder if you could just make a website for support and
download of your app. Sell it on the site via Paypal or a shopping cart. Can
Apple prevent developers from doing this?
Nathan Mynarcik
Interactive Web Developer
nat...@mynarcik.com
254.749.2525
www.mynarcik.com
-O
as long as what you serve to the bots and as no flash content isn't
different to what gets read by your flash i think it's cool...
On 20 April 2010 14:29, Juan Pablo Califano wrote:
> Isn't that kind of thing considered "unfair" play and penalized by search
> engines if discovered?
> Cheers
> J
I believe you just can't sell the app on the appstore. You can export and add
it to any iPhone, its just against their SDK to sell it on iTunes.
--Original Message--
From: Paul Andrews
Sender: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To: Flash Coders List
ReplyTo: Flash Coders List
Sub
Isn't that kind of thing considered "unfair" play and penalized by search
engines if discovered?
Cheers
Juan Pablo Califano
2010/4/20 tom rhodes
> use some server side script to serve up your site, check to see in the
> headers sent to the server if the request coems from a bot or from a
> browse
Before anyone gets excited, I don't wish to re-ignite the Jobs/Apple
hatemail (please pick another thread to manifest your anger) - just a
question about the Apple development stranglehold.
Even if the output from Adobes Flash->Apple conversion doesn't result in
an officially sanctioned app th
>
> if you just moved from a third-world country and promised the client a huge
> ecommerce flash site and usually hire russian flash devs but don't have any
> contacts now and don't have money for a book then i would advise against
> posting.
>
>
>
heh heh
_
use some server side script to serve up your site, check to see in the
headers sent to the server if the request coems from a bot or from a
browser, if from a bot, serve up your xml, if from a browser server up your
site.
have a google for "swfaddress SEO"
On 20 April 2010 11:52, Paul Andrews
Hi Paul,
Your best bet is to use something like SwfObject to write the flash in
JavaScript, while serving indexable content to Google. That can be just some
static text, or dynamically read content from the xml files. A fringe benefit
of that is the ability to serve alternate content to browser
I have a client whose website I developed (something like a year ago) in
Flash and the site is totally driven by xml configuration files. It
works well.
My client has told me that google has indexed the site, but the google
indexing contains an warning message - basically the flash site app
41 matches
Mail list logo
