Gregory, I'm on a Mac and have tried to do just what you're trying.
I've had no luck with it on the Mac at all. Had the same results in
the other browsers as well.
We never found a way to get it to work. Sorry!
Brian Mays
On 10/31/05, Gregory_GOusable [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working
http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/index.jsp
Does MLB.com play properly in Firefox? There's a Video Highlights
box to the right that extends down over HTML. So far it has worked in
all the browsers. The Black History/WBC/Spring Training sections look
to be static.
Is this something similar to what
, but the rest of us who
use Flash on a Mac can't get any more than 2 faces (normal, italic) to
work in Flash.
That's my 2 cents :-)
Brian Mays
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http
Not getting messages. Sorry for inconvenience.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier
Mostly a graphic design oriented forum, but this probably has some areas
where you could discuss it.
http://forum.howdesign.com/
Good luck, been in your shoes,
Brian Mays
On 6/1/06 8:56 AM, Manuel Saint-Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone is
willing to offlist me and school me
I would be interested as well.
Brian
On 6/1/06 9:16 AM, mike cann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are going to take the discussion private can i ask politely to be
CC'ed in too pls as im very interested in this topic too :)
___
there, and if they don't know I imagine they'll tell you some place that
might be good for that discussion.
Brian Mays
On 6/1/06 9:46 AM, Rifled Cloaca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How Design would be a Graphic Design forum, yes? From my experience,
graphic designer freelance rates are much lower than
I've got some notes on this sort of thing, but I won't have access to them
until tonight...and wouldn't do them justice pulling them from memory. I'll
see about pulling these together.
I don't have a fixed rate for everything I do. If something is a lower type
of production, I do lower rates.
Manuel, if it's ok I'd like to answer this more in depth once I have access
to my notes. For now let me say that arriving at what you want to charge
will need to take into account a few financial variables that will actually
help with all your freelance estimates from here on out (hopefully!).
Actually, a better idea may be for me to place my notes on a site. I'll do
that this evening.
Thanks,
Brian
On 6/1/06 10:48 AM, Manuel Saint-Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian-
so in that case what's a ballpark for a medium project
___
What you mention about building a portfolio and a reputation is valid.
However keep in mind that if you ever try to raise rates with clients that
you're a little lower on they'll likely balk.
Another thing to keep in mind...if clients aren't willing to pay what you
want to make and you know you
. ($35,000 for example)
$35,000 + 52,000 = 87,000.
$87,000/1,428 = $60.92 per hour billable rate
- Figure in profit you would like to make, somewhere between 10 20
percent.
$60.92 + 10% = $67.01
So this particular example needs to bill hourly at about $67.
Hopefully that helps everyone.
Brian Mays
That was a graphic designer's salary :-) And the book's example :-)
On 6/5/06 8:56 AM, Lee McColl-Sylvester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
$40k salary? What planet are you on? ;-)
It should be twice that at least!
___
Many do. But using this number, maybe people can see how they are
drastically undercharging for their work.
On 6/5/06 9:08 AM, Lee McColl-Sylvester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought Graphic Designers were on good salaries. Wow, glad I chose
the career path I'm following. With all my
On 6/13/06 4:29 PM, Steven Sacks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You do realize that this is, and always has been, an unmoderated list,
right?
Now that isn't true at all. I remember back in the early years the OT
police jumped on anyone who posted OT stuff. Brendan was behind most of
that,
conceptual standpoint, I'd say check out 2 good graphic design
magazines, Communication Arts and HOW Design.
Brian Mays
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo
Great minds think alike :-)
Their Interactive Annuals have a good deal of Flash in them. And
there's some analysis as to why they chose what they chose to get into
the annuals.
On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Ryan Potter wrote:
That's funny. Comm Arts and How are the only subscriptions I
Even those of us who use scenes??? ;-)
Brian Mays
On 3/11/08 9:17 AM, Merrill, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Or Flash_Tiger on Yahoo - we embrace Actionscripters of all types, skill
level, donor status and music preference.
___
Flashcoders
I don't completely understand everything it's describing but I sent it on to
our programming team who responded with the words wow...heinous bug.
Brian Mays
On 4/14/08 12:58 PM, Steven Sacks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And just a note here, but the blogosphere is starting to come alive
Awesome. Thanks. This reinforces some points I've been making to so
colleagues.
Brian Mays
On 7/15/08 3:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i just published an article called Charges Against ActionScript 3.0
covering the things people don't like about ActionScript 3.0
on :-) Feel free to agree or disagree (althought I may not
respond quickly because I'm conducting a tour group for 4 hours, YIPES!).
Brian Mays
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo
On 7/17/08 10:35 AM, Matt S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I think part of the problem is the increasingly
schizophrenic nature of Flash's identity as an application.
I like that. That's my new mantra :-)
Brian Mays
___
Flashcoders mailing list
This has been the pendulum usually swings. Good to hear it.
Brian Mays
On 7/21/08 6:02 AM, allandt bik-elliott (thefieldcomic.com)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
adobe has been saying that the next version of flash will be designer-driven
so it's maybe something that is being looked
Hey Manuel. Another DART related question. I notice that when viewing with
the Flash 10 player I'm sent alternative static version of our DART files.
Any thoughts when the detection might be updated?
Brian Mays
On 7/28/08 3:50 PM, Manuel Ponce de Leon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Helmut
When I taught Flash students they were always content with letting Flash's
nasty default shape tweens do whatever they pleased.
Getting them into shape hints was always something that went over well, IF
they could wrap their minds around it.
Brian Mays
On 3/26/09 9:28 AM, laurent laur
That type of thing is why I think so many digital media companies have
failed. The ones I've seen succeed charge for time and materials, and that
time includes meetings.
Brian Mays
On 5/14/09 7:07 AM, Matt S. mattsp...@gmail.com wrote:
My experience is that time-estimates on these kinds
OH too true. I needed this a week ago.
Brian Mays
On 5/28/09 12:49 PM, Steven Sacks flash...@stevensacks.net wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2a8TRSgzZY
This is a work of genius.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders
Have you tried the tutorials at kirupa.com?
http://www.flashkit.com/ has some tutorials, downloads and forums as well.
On 1/26/10 8:04 AM, beno - flashmeb...@gmail.com wrote:
On second thought, forget flashnewbie. 3 posts so far this year. Hardly an
active list. Other suggestions?
beno
video is the
only thing Flash is used for.
HTML5 also is not only video.
I've wondered if a future iteration of Flash will take that into account and
give us an Export as HTML 5 button :-)
Brian Mays
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders
of it as a computer, more a device consolidating things that I
would be buying 3 or more devices for.
Brian Mays
-Original Message-
From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com on behalf of Nathan Mynarcik
Sent: Fri 1/29/2010 12:17 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders
I'm going to chime in to say this current tide reminds me of the hubbub that
rose up when this article was written:
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20001029.html
The article's title: Flash is 99% bad.
It was published 10 years ago.
We've survived and evolved.
Brian Mays
In 2000 when the article was written there was no such thing as swfaddress,
or swfobject. Point being, everything this article criticized ended up being
addressed either by Adobe or developers creating solutions for those issues.
The uprising that we're seeing the last few days is very similar to
graphics are targeted to our desktop users. The iPhone
users get a site that isn't built to handle graphics like that. The iPad
users get a customized site as well. Now we can say our desktop users have
their own product :)
Brian Mays
___
Flashcoders
.
Thoughts?
Brian Mays
On 5/11/10 7:48 AM, Mendelsohn, Michael michael.mendels...@fmglobal.com
wrote:
Hi list...
It seems to me that Flash might not be the tool most threatened by HTML5,
but rather the PDF format. HTML5 obviously can't replace all of Flash's
capabilities. But, it has all
! Seemed like something might be
a good fit.
Brian Mays
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
practically build a website with HTML5 and
CSS3 then wrap it all up in an app shell at the end.
Brian Mays
On 9/10/10 6:01 AM, Merrill, Jason jason.merr...@bankofamerica.com
wrote:
This refers to building actual iOS applications for the app store, not web
sites. You can't develop iOS apps
A couple of links that might help.
http://www.adobe.com/digitalpublishing/
http://www.adobe.com/products/digitalpublishingsuite/
Brian Mays
On 11/17/10 9:22 AM, Gregory Boudreaux gjboudre...@fedex.com wrote:
For the iPad... my fault.
Thanks for the info. I will do a little searching
Found this one right after I sent:
http://blogs.adobe.com/digitalpublishing/
On 11/17/10 9:22 AM, Gregory Boudreaux gjboudre...@fedex.com wrote:
For the iPad... my fault.
Thanks for the info. I will do a little searching to see if I can find more
about it.
My initial read on it was an InDesign add-on. I'm not sure that is what it
actually is. What is your read on it?
On 11/17/10 10:15 AM, Gregory Boudreaux gjboudre...@fedex.com wrote:
That is good info Looks like Q2 of 2011 is the target date.
gregb
39 matches
Mail list logo
