Re: [Flashcoders] shared local object, or XML export? or other?

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Tague

You could always use one of the flash wrappers that give you access to the
filesystem, which would allow you to write files to the users drive,
somehting like zinc.

I think, although someone can confirm this that the shared object can be
accessed by a second app if the name of the app is the same. Might need to a
quick test to confirm this.

On 3/19/07, kent humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


For an upcoming project, I have to investigate whether to use a shared
localobject for storing user data, or exporting XML.

This is for a cd based app, not a website. A shared localobject would be
my
first choice, except that we want to be able to access the saved data from
a
second release of the cd. My understanding of the security of local
objects
is that they are only accessible from the app that created them. Is that
correct? Or is it possible to work around that?

If the second release would not be able to retrieve the data, I thought
maybe exporting XML would be an option. But from my searches, all the ways
of doing that involve sending to a server, and we wont be able rely on net
access being available. Are there any other ways of exporting xml?

Or is there a method I haven't thought of? The basic requirement is that
user data can be saved to the local machine, and then read in again by the
same app, and any other subsequent apps. Ideally we don't want to have to
do
a local install, but would consider it if there is no other way.

Thanks for your time.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] shared local object, or XML export? or other?

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Tague

forgot the link to zinc..

http://www.multidmedia.com/



On 3/19/07, Chris Tague [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


You could always use one of the flash wrappers that give you access to the
filesystem, which would allow you to write files to the users drive,
somehting like zinc.

I think, although someone can confirm this that the shared object can be
accessed by a second app if the name of the app is the same. Might need to a
quick test to confirm this.

On 3/19/07, kent humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For an upcoming project, I have to investigate whether to use a shared
 localobject for storing user data, or exporting XML.

 This is for a cd based app, not a website. A shared localobject would be
 my
 first choice, except that we want to be able to access the saved data
 from a
 second release of the cd. My understanding of the security of local
 objects
 is that they are only accessible from the app that created them. Is that
 correct? Or is it possible to work around that?

 If the second release would not be able to retrieve the data, I thought
 maybe exporting XML would be an option. But from my searches, all the
 ways
 of doing that involve sending to a server, and we wont be able rely on
 net
 access being available. Are there any other ways of exporting xml?

 Or is there a method I haven't thought of? The basic requirement is that
 user data can be saved to the local machine, and then read in again by
 the
 same app, and any other subsequent apps. Ideally we don't want to have
 to do
 a local install, but would consider it if there is no other way.

 Thanks for your time.
 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
 http://www.figleaf.com
 http://training.figleaf.com




___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


Re: [Flashcoders] shared local object, or XML export? or other?

2007-03-19 Thread Ian Thomas

Hi Kent,
  The other way to export XML would be to use a SWF wrapper such as
mProjector, SWFStudio or (open-source) SWHX: http://www.haxe.org/swhx.
(Zinc is another alternative, but I can't recommend it - I've had all
sorts of stability issues with it.)

  Alternatively, Apollo (from Adobe) will be out sometime this year.

 Basically all these tools provide a container for a Flash app that
lets Flash request writing/reading of external local files (amongst
many other features).

Hope that's helpful,
  Ian

On 3/19/07, kent humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

For an upcoming project, I have to investigate whether to use a shared
localobject for storing user data, or exporting XML.

This is for a cd based app, not a website. A shared localobject would be my
first choice, except that we want to be able to access the saved data from a
second release of the cd. My understanding of the security of local objects
is that they are only accessible from the app that created them. Is that
correct? Or is it possible to work around that?

If the second release would not be able to retrieve the data, I thought
maybe exporting XML would be an option. But from my searches, all the ways
of doing that involve sending to a server, and we wont be able rely on net
access being available. Are there any other ways of exporting xml?

Or is there a method I haven't thought of? The basic requirement is that
user data can be saved to the local machine, and then read in again by the
same app, and any other subsequent apps. Ideally we don't want to have to do
a local install, but would consider it if there is no other way.

Thanks for your time.

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


RE: [Flashcoders] shared local object, or XML export? or other?

2007-03-19 Thread Karina Steffens
I would definitely go with shared object. You can access it from whatever
app you like if you pass a local path parameter, like this:
so = SharedObject.getLocal (mySharedObject, /)
so = SharedObject.getLocal (mySharedObject, /myProject)
Etc...
If you don't pass the path, it generates a local path for you, which is
indeed different for each application, to avoid naming conflicts. But by
specifying the path you bypass that and can call it from anywhere you like.

Karina

 -Original Message-
 From: kent humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 19 March 2007 10:50
 To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 Subject: [Flashcoders] shared local object, or XML export? or other?
 
 For an upcoming project, I have to investigate whether to use 
 a shared localobject for storing user data, or exporting XML.
 
 This is for a cd based app, not a website. A shared 
 localobject would be my first choice, except that we want to 
 be able to access the saved data from a second release of the 
 cd. My understanding of the security of local objects is that 
 they are only accessible from the app that created them. Is 
 that correct? Or is it possible to work around that?
 
 If the second release would not be able to retrieve the data, 
 I thought maybe exporting XML would be an option. But from my 
 searches, all the ways of doing that involve sending to a 
 server, and we wont be able rely on net access being 
 available. Are there any other ways of exporting xml?
 
 Or is there a method I haven't thought of? The basic 
 requirement is that user data can be saved to the local 
 machine, and then read in again by the same app, and any 
 other subsequent apps. Ideally we don't want to have to do a 
 local install, but would consider it if there is no other way.
 
 Thanks for your time.
 ___
 Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
 To change your subscription options or search the archive:
 http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
 
 Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
 Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training 
 http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
 

___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com