thought HTML5 was the new buzzword and that it would make sense to state it
at least 3 times on every page?
John
2012/1/17 Ron G rgrimes@...mailto:rgrimes@...
Hi Joaoak:
You can make the coupling as tight or loose as you want. Each UI object can
have a client side widget that is primarily
developers.
Currently, they are on RC2 for ZK 6. So, I would anticipate these features
being GA soon.
Ron
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Ron G rgrimes@... wrote:
Just go to Zkoss.org and do a search on HTML5. You'll see a lot about how it
is increasing support for HTML5. Here is one neat
Hi Joaoak:
You can make the coupling as tight or loose as you want. Each UI object can
have a client side widget that is primarily the appearance, and a server side
component that should contain the more complex logic. So, you can hide as much
as want by placing it in the server side component
The problem with that approach is a lot of people are behind corporate
firewalls where they also do not have local admin rights and are therefore not
allowed to install anything on their desktop. If they want it, they have to
call the network guys and get authorization and then have them
Valdhor:
You are right about that. That is precisely why we went with Flex originally
(it insulated us from X-Browser issues). But, since we can't count on that
lasting, and even Adobe is telling developers to plan on moving to HTML5, it
seems like they're pushing us back into x-browser
Whoaaa! Just re-read that, and if there is any one statement in all this thread
that readers should pay attention to, it is this statement from Alex (quoted
below).
If FlashBuilder is going to be geared toward gaming in Flash, I wonder which
IDE Flex developers are planning on using for the
Michael,
In my deliberations as to whether to stick with Flex or not, I weighed the
likelihood of a successful open-source Flex community. And, I must say I am not
as hopeful as you. For one, we already seen how people failed to find interest
in Open Laszlo. Second, the best and brightest
Learning
___
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Ron G
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 9:15 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex alternatives
Yes, we have also abandoned Flex
. Not looking elsewhere.
** **
*Michael*
** **
*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *Ron G
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:15 PM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* [flexcoders] Re: Flex alternatives
a
popular paradigm for creating HTML5 apps.
On 1/12/12 9:38 AM, Ron G rgrimes@... wrote:
Hi James,
I certainly respect the decision of those who are sticking with Flex, but I
would suggest that developers do so with the recognition that they may be
developing with a technology
So, I think we have a similar vision for where things are going with respect to
Adobe supporting HTML5 for the enterprise. But, I fail to see why Flex and
FlashBuilder would have any part of that. Why not just fall back to your
excellent product, Dreamweaver, and enhance it as the IDE for
Rishi Tandon,
Seems to me, from your signature, that you have an invested interest in Flex
continuing. I would say that makes it difficult for you to see the difference
between a reality and our own perception, as you so aptly put it.
The least Adobe could do, after kicking Flex out to go live
I have used Flex since 2006, and I have used ZKoss within the last year. I can
tell you that the learning curve of ZKoss is much lower than Flex, and the
development cycle is even faster. In your spare time, if you're curious like me
and like to check out different technologies, give it a
Yes, we have also abandoned Flex in favor of ZKoss. Since we are already a Java
shop, on the server side, it seemed logical to use a Java based framework on
the client-side.
The thing I really like about ZK or ZKoss is that it has equivalent components
to Flex. In fact, it actually has more
14 matches
Mail list logo
