:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Michael Schmalle
*Sent:* Friday, June 30, 2006 1:23 PM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: Shouldn't we use Flex to built website
Just to add to this again.
Where this line is for me
Of *Michael Schmalle
*Sent:* Friday, June 30, 2006 1:23 PM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: Shouldn't we use Flex to built
website
Just to add to this again.
Where this line is for me;
Page layout. I find myself time and time again dreaming up
--
*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Michael Schmalle
*Sent:* Friday, June 30, 2006 1:23 PM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Re: Shouldn't we
use Flex to built
website
Just to add
Flash has the main Benefit against flex is that Authoring tool for the graphics work
Regards, Jignesh Dodiya
__._,_.___
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives:
Please see my responses inline below...
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Jennifer Larkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sean Corfield had his site running in PHP because he could easily
use
an existing PHP package that did what he wanted and there was no
ColdFusion equivalent. A frequently
Just to add to this again.
Where this line is for me;
Page layout. I find myself time and time again dreaming up new things
for Flex and knowing I can't do them because as much as I want to
abstract out how much a user 'knows' how to read, they are just so
conditioned to seeing the format and
Of Michael Schmalle
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 1:23
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re:
Shouldn't we use Flex to built website
Just to add to this again.
Where this line is for me;
Page layout. I find myself time and time again dreaming up new things for Flex
nt: Friday, June 30, 2006 1:23
PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re:
Shouldn't we use Flex to built website
Just to add to this again.
Where this line is for me;
Page layout. I find myself time and time again dreaming up new things for Flex
and knowing I can
Sean Corfield had his site running in PHP because he could easily use
an existing PHP package that did what he wanted and there was no
ColdFusion equivalent. A frequently asked question that he got was
Why aren't you using ColdFusion on your personal site? Shouldn't you
be using ColdFusion? He got
I agree that the line between web site and web app is quite fuzzy,
and that the general statement Don't use Flex to build web sites
should not be deemed an absolute rule.
What I don't agree with is that the subject matter of one's site
justifies using Flex... regardless of the required
Usually the ones screaming the loudest about Flash or Flex being used
as a website platform are the ones that fear that the antiquated web
technologies that they are versed in are going to be replaced.
If the client wants an all Flash/Flex website, give it to them as long
as they know the pros
the ones that fear that the antiquated web technologies that they are versed in are going to be replaced.
I wasn't going to say it, but I second it.
It has happened forever in the history of innovation.
Peace, Mike
On 6/27/06, securenetfreedom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you misunderstand me. I have nothing against flash sites. I'm referring to the poorly done ones where flash users were doing things merely because they now could, not because it was good design. I'm not saying anyone here falls into this category, but typically it was done by people who
Does that make more sense?
Yeah it makes sense, that is what you should have said.
As far as you being worried about others making YOU look bad, check
back to what Tim Hoff said about that issue, I would write the same
thing verbatim.
Besides, web sites, the way users are conditioned by
On 6/26/06, Nick Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you misunderstand me. I have nothing against flash sites. I'm referring to the poorly done ones where flash users were doing things merely because they now could, not because it was good design. I'm not saying anyone here falls into
] On Behalf Of hank williams
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:25
AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re:
Shouldn't we use Flex to built website
On 6/26/06, Nick
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think you misunderstand me. I have nothing against flash sites. I'm
those who decide to use Flex to do website designs rank right with
those who did all that other crap in the early days of flash with
bouncing balls and forced site intros and such.
I have no opinion on this subject whatsoever but..
Would like to point out that this comment is ridiculous.
Bouncing balls and skip intros; yes, there's plenty of that out
there. But, there's also a ton of goofy html sites as well. Flex,
similar to its sibling Flash, is just a tool. It's like
saying, Don't use a screwdriver to open a can. You can certainly
do it, but that's not the best use of a
I'm not afraid of bouncing balls. Flex is about user experience.
That's why bouncing and a lot more of the old flash stuff is/was
important. Flex seems like the professional manifestation of what has
been discovered experimentally over years. The last years where a
little bit quiet in this regard,
You're saying you don't agree with the statement that Flex should be
reserved for applications? I would say that Flex should most
definitely NOT be used for building a website. Just because it could,
does not mean it should. IMO, those who decide to use Flex to do
website designs rank right with
thanx all for reply and wish many other give their ideas on thisRegards, Jignesh Dodiya
__._,_.___
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
21 matches
Mail list logo
