@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] WebOrb for Rails You make interesting points and I agree Adobe should think/act bigger in terms of other languages. Microsoft is even going it with .NET (IronPython,
Ruby.NET; community driven but MSFT is supporting them/talking about them
rep confirmed the time of death when we asked them about it. It's not coming.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ups.com] On Behalf Of John C. Bland IISent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 9:03 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] WebOrb for Rails
: [flexcoders] WebOrb for Rails You make interesting points and I agree Adobe should think/act bigger in terms of other languages. Microsoft is even going it with .NET (IronPython,
Ruby.NET; community driven but MSFT is supporting them/talking about them). I don't agree with every point
: Monday, October 09, 2006
11:29 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] WebOrb
for Rails
Ahh man, you're off here but it is nothing but an opinion from
both of us.
Your opinions are based on speculation. Mine are based on facts.
Competition helps the technology thrive
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ups.com [mailto:flexcoders@
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John C. Bland II
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:15 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] WebOrb for Rails You make interesting points and I agree Adobe should
Of John C. Bland II
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:15 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] WebOrb for Rails
You make interesting points and I agree Adobe should think/act bigger in
terms of other languages. Microsoft is even going
way. It's supressing the technology.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ups.com [mailto:flexcoders@
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John C. Bland IISent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.comSubject:
Re: [flexcoders] WebOrb for Rails
You make interesting points and I agree Ad
You make interesting points and I agree Adobe should think/act bigger in terms of other languages. Microsoft is even going it with .NET (IronPython, Ruby.NET; community driven but MSFT is supporting them/talking about them).
I don't agree with every point though. WebORB is a competitor to
, October 04, 2006
4:15 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] WebOrb
for Rails
You make interesting points and I agree Adobe should think/act bigger
in terms of other languages. Microsoft is even going it with .NET (IronPython,
Ruby.NET; community driven but MSFT
Ive been looking at The Midnight
Coders WebOrb for Rails and Im very impressed. Has Adobe given
any thought to hiring these developers so they could get these implementations
ported into Adobes Flex Data Services? I know Adobes working on a
.NET implementation, but getting a Ruby
I love how much buzz WebOrb is getting.
Adobe is trying to keep the price of their java/flash remoting server high. Which is understandable. They need to make money on the product or we'll all be out of jobs. (Well I would be anyway.) But if Adobe were to aquire WebOrb how much do you think
11 matches
Mail list logo
