fields support?
- Dan
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Weyert de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At least it has forced Adobe to make improvements to Flash, like better
> RTL support and the overall text support in general... Look at the new
> text rendering and fields support in the upcoming
At least it has forced Adobe to make improvements to Flash, like better
RTL support and the overall text support in general... Look at the new
text rendering and fields support in the upcoming Flash 10 Player...
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flex
On Wednesday 13 Feb 2008, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
> another", Microsoft is in a unique position, given its market
> penetration, to be much more guilty of this than anyone else.
Indeed, it's the only one to have been found guilty *in court* of abusing that
position, on both sides of the pond recen
ctor).
-Original Message-
From: Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Adobe People, Save me from Silverlight!
(Microsoft's Legal Record)
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:27:35 +
On
On Wednesday 13 Feb 2008, Jon Bradley wrote:
> whatever. If the technology is good, clients demand it and it makes
> money, I use it.
What worries me is that when MS technology *isn't* good, clients still demand
it because MS has FUD'ed them to death.
--
Tom Chiverton, writing this from KDE's g
On Feb 13, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Tom Chiverton wrote:
Conduct in the past often informs future conduct.
Where a company has used a product as a weapon to bankrupt the
competion, at
the expense of features, as MS has done in the past, it is hard to
see how it
is not going to do so again i.e. mak
On Wednesday 13 Feb 2008, Jon Bradley wrote:
> What Microsoft has done in it's history to people is irrelevant. You
Conduct in the past often informs future conduct.
Where a company has used a product as a weapon to bankrupt the competion, at
the expense of features, as MS has done in the past, i
On Feb 12, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Robert Thompson wrote:
The thing developers need to be concerned about is Microsoft's
history.
[big snip]
Honestly.
What Microsoft has done in it's history to people is irrelevant. You
obviously care deeply, given your rough road and history with them.
That
On Wednesday 13 Feb 2008, Weyert de Boer wrote:
> Mono/Moonlight to compile Silverlight projects on like Linux or MacOSX.
Don't be fooled into this.
Microsoft *will* wait just long enough for Moonlight to prove it has a chance
of making a 'nix version work, thus letting MS claim
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Adobe People,Save me from Silverlight!
(Microsoft's Legal Record)
As far as I knew you needed Visual Studio to develop for silverlight, has
that changed?
On Feb 13, 2008 10:04 AM, Weyert de Boer <[EMAIL PROT
FlashLite already outperforms Silverlight in my opinion, and with Papervision
3D creating such great 3D api's, I see no reason at all for anyone to move out
from a perfectly safe place with Adobe, to crawl over to Microsoft, who has
shown their behavior patterns so consistently in bad-faith and
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh McDonald
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:42 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Adobe People, Save me from
Silverlight! (Microsoft's Legal Record)
Yeah, probably. I think you can use the smcs compiler part of
Mono/Moonlight to compile Silverlight projects on like Linux or MacOSX.
Of course, you won't have the lovely Visual Studio IDE, though.
> As far as I knew you needed Visual Studio to develop for silverlight,
> has that changed?
>
>
>
As far as I knew you needed Visual Studio to develop for silverlight, has
that changed?
On Feb 13, 2008 10:04 AM, Weyert de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's works fine for me under MacOSX. Indeed you can't run Blend under
> that platform. In my opinion Silverlight is only interesting as a
It's works fine for me under MacOSX. Indeed you can't run Blend under
that platform. In my opinion Silverlight is only interesting as a user
interface engine for those Windows Mobile devices only that will
take a long while ;)
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Robert Thompson
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:17 PM
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Adobe People, Save me from Silverlight!
> (Microsoft's Legal Record)
>
>
>
> Also Kevin, I think you m
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 2:17 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Adobe People, Save me from Silverlight!
(Microsoft's Legal Record)
Also Kevin, I think you might have mis-interpreted by what I meant by "
on
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:50 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Adobe People, Save me from Silverlight! (Microsoft's
Legal Record)
Here is a big reason why NOT to go with Silver-Light:
I am Robert D. Thompson.
Here is Federally
-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:50 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Adobe People, Save me from Silverlight! (Microsoft's
Legal Record)
Here is a big reason w
groups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:50 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Adobe People, Save me from Silverlight!
(Microsoft's Legal Record)
Here is a big reason why NOT to go with Silver-Light:
I a
Here is a big reason why NOT to go with Silver-Light:
I am Robert D. Thompson.
Here is Federally Published public record of something,
http://www.fedcirc.us/case-reviews/thompson-v.-microsoft-corporation-4.html
I will not discuss the above public record, but will discuss why I believe it
would
21 matches
Mail list logo
