> Yeah, Adobe is so terribly unresponsive. Its too bad that their
> engineers don't actually take time to respond on random forums or
> anything. Why won't they just put out a new version that directly
> addresses the community's reaction to the 1.0 product? Hmm...
Yeah, like those unofficial
, drive through.
-rg
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mykola
PaliyenkoSent: Friday, April 14, 2006 6:25 AMTo:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Question to
Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code Quality
Ok,as a r
Ok,as a result we have a FlexCompiler servlet that has a memory leaks and kills application server periodically. It is absolutely a stop-ship bug but Adobe has not released new version of Flex 1.5 yet. As a result there is no stable version of Flex. Yeah I'm realizing that Flex is pretty far fro
Mykola Paliyenko wrote:
>
> I don't think you should change working code only because it's
> doesn't
> have the perfect design, but that might just me. Of course, you
> can do
> something refactoring. You can only break ;-)
>
>
> LOL,
> With such approach Flex will remain the sa
I don't think you should change working code only because it's doesn't
have the perfect design, but that might just me. Of course, you can do
something refactoring. You can only break ;-)LOL,
With such approach Flex will remain the same crap as it is now
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: htt
I don't think you should change working code only because it's doesn't
have the perfect design, but that might just me. Of course, you can do
something refactoring. You can only break ;-)
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Arc
Max,
I think I have been professional here and other would agree.
I have listened to you, tried to understand, and posted code to help.
Please keep Flexcoders professional, it is not personal. :)
Flash/Flex is simple for a reason. As a platform, it was designed to create
light and fast distri
Let me just point out no one from Flex Engineering is paying attention
to this thread anymore. If you guys want to fight offlist that's fine
with me.
Matt
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.co
> OUT OF CONTEXT
At least he wasn't shouting... Or keeping scores.
Let's face it Max, you're rude and have been throughout this thread. Go read
up on list etiquette before trying to revolutionize the programming world.
Stefan
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fl
Maxym, you're the best (in so many ways).This is such groundbreaking insight, do keep it coming.e k z___Ikezi KamanuAdobe Consulting
On 4/11/06, maxym.hryniv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ted, You've not understood me one more time. I don't have a problem
with creating my own co
> And DOM model is designed for TREE of objects, but we cannot
> use it in non-visual tree, that because IT"S BAD DESIGNED.
---
WITH FLEX 2 YOU CAN SUPPORT THIS TODAY, YOU ARE NOT RESTRICTED.
-
lexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maxym
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 4:18 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code
Quality
I had no possibility to reply, cause it was weekend, sorry.
Your last post
nd essentially lean and mean.
If it’s hard for you just take a
look at C#.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Maxym
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:42 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Q
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Maxym
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:42 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe
about Flex Framework 1.5 Code Quality
Yeah, I can.
DOM Specification: The first goal is the design of
an event
@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maxym
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:42 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe
about Flex Framework 1.5 Code Quality
Yeah, I can.
DOM Specification: The first goal is the design of
an event system
lication Instance >>> MXML
Application Instance inserted here!
_
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gordon Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:13 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe about Flex Framewo
ce >>> MXML
Application Instance inserted here!
_
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon
Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:13 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code
Quality
Gordon,
I had my ASC hat on and was thinking the MXML generated AS was similar...
With ActionScript projects, the base class is the root of the DisplayList.
package{
class
, April 06, 2006 4:04 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code
Quality
Thanks, Ted. You've done a great job of explaining the benefits of the new
event system!
I just want to correct one thing, though. You said "E
Behalf Of Maxym
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:42 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code
Quality
Yeah, I can.
DOM Specification: The first goal is the design of an event system which allows
registration of event
u can't
extend EventDispatcher you have to duplicate (do you know some AOP concepts)
it's logic (at least one time) and implement IEventDispatcher.
4.
I can say more but I'm tired of typing…
From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
, 2006 11:42 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Question to Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code
Quality
Yeah, I can.
DOM Specification: The first goal is the design of an event system which allows
registration of event listeners and describes event flow through a tree
structu
r this release! -- as the
product is already at Beta 2.
- Gordon
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Maxym
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006
8:42 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re:
Question to Adobe about Flex F
ron
J. Schall
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 5:46 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Question to
Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code Quality
maxym.hryniv wrote:
> Looking at Flex 2 framework event model, and
Flex 2 Framework UML
> (Flex 2 api visual refe
on J. Schall
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006
5:46 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re:
Question to Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5 Code Quality
maxym.hryniv wrote:
> Looking at Flex 2 framework event model, and
Flex 2 Framework UML
> (Flex 2 api visual reference by Roc
IEventDispatcher.
4.
I can say more but I’m tired of typing…
From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darron J. Schall
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006
5:46 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re:
Question to Adobe about Flex Framework 1.5
maxym.hryniv wrote:
> Looking at Flex 2 framework event model, and Flex 2 Framework UML
> (Flex 2 api visual reference by Rocket Boots) I don't believe that
> Flex 2 is better.
Can you be more specific? The event model is fundamentally part of the
player is an based on the DOM Level 3 Events
27 matches
Mail list logo
