]
http://weblogs.macromedia.com/auhlmann
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Anderson
Sent: 20 January 2007 05:14
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] BindingUtils.bindProperty versus mx:Binding
Hello All
On 1/20/07, Alex Uhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd question why you would want to replace all our MXML bindings when it's
working like a charm for you? ;) Aren't MXML bindings (curly braces,
function bindings, mx:Binding/Observe) easier to write and maintain?
AFAIK Not aplicable to
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] BindingUtils.bindProperty versus mx:Binding
On 1/20/07, Alex Uhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd question why you would want to replace all our MXML bindings
when it's working like a charm for you? ;) Aren't MXML bindings (curly
braces, function
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] BindingUtils.bindProperty versus mx:Binding
Closer to your mx:Binding tag is:
BindingUtils.bindProperty( userVO, Name, this, [ nameTextInput,
text ] );
but keep in mind that binding of mx.binding.utils using ChangeWatcher
and BindingUtils work differently from
Hello All,
I am not having much luck, using the bindProperty method of creating
bindings.
At the moment, I am using the mx:Binding method, and it's working like
a charm.
But, I am trying to get away from this, so I can put all my binding
logic into my ActionScript Code. I was under the
5 matches
Mail list logo