Jim Lux wrote (of my dream):
Why not have it spit out on Ethernet?
I thought about this at length. I think it is better and more flexible
for the hypothetical new SDR (even with the added USB/micro in between
us and the current rig) to be a USB 2.0 appliance rather than a network
Ah. Thanks for clearing this up. Mine ALL had the linear regulator,
and we did in fact have to remove those and replace them with the
regulator on the other side of the board to mount to the heat sink. I
was wondering which of us had lost their minds. WHile it wasn't that,
I am clearly
If a decision is made to abandon the serial port protocol I would go for
ethernet so that the radio *can* be put on a network.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
---
www.sysgem.com, www.hb9drv.ch, www.laax.ch
---
- Original Message -
From: Larry Loen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought about this at
That can be done right now if someone wants to take up integrating the
Socket Utilities Library and TCPListener Class that I wrote into the
current PowerSDR source code. I added it to a test version of
PowerSDR 1.3.12 (see blog entry for Tuesday, June 28, 2005 at
Of course I should note that you will still have to have a PC
connected to the SDR-1000 but that can be easily done with a mini-itx
board. Better, yet it would be cool to strip most or all of the GUI
stuff out of PowerSDR except for the setup forms (to make setting
changes to the database - this
Simon Brown wrote:
If a decision is made to abandon the serial port protocol I would go for
ethernet so that the radio *can* be put on a network.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
---
www.sysgem.com, www.hb9drv.ch, www.laax.ch
---
And, under my scheme, nothing whatever would stop you from doing so. It
Lee A Crocker wrote:
When I
read the QST review and I see this kind of report:
Although I could not altogether
eliminate the delay, I was able to
train my brain to work with it.
And then I look at the CW waveform and there are 2 key
closures before the first dit is transmitted, it make
me very
John Sielke:
The CW question is what keeps me from throwing in my money. Is there any
chance we will see QSK, or even true semi-break-in CW with the FLEX? I
fear some may say, why make new technology accomodate an obsolete
mode? If that is the case, and CW will remain an orphan in the
Hi Cecel,
The MS C# Express Beta uses the .NET 2.0 Beta framework. There were
not too many problems changing the PowerSDR code to get it to compile
on .NET 2.0 last time I tried (around version 1.2.x). After you
convert the PowerSDR source code project to .NET 2.0 people will not
be able to
Cecil, I mean. Sorry about that... :-) (That's what I get for relying
on the spell checker too much)...
73 de Phil N8VB
On 10/7/05, Philip Covington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Cecel,
The MS C# Express Beta uses the .NET 2.0 Beta framework. There were
not too many problems changing the
Hi Cecil,See answers below:On 10/7/05, KD5NWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Mono has the advantage that its being worked on all three platforms of interest to me. And SharpDevelop looks quite usable.
I
always get the latest SharpDevelop source code from SVN.It
is easy to build and does not take much
Cecil,
I, too, experience the Open Form in Design
Mode - Go take 10 min. break - Return to watch form finish loading
process. The IDE really gets
bogged down when there are many controls on a single form. Having said that, once
I have opened the form, modifying the properties of the
Definitely a good choice, also.
There is Boa Constructor
that uses wxWindows for the GUI. It has a GUI designer built
in. Runs on both Windows and Linux. For those who like
Borland's Delphi or C++ Builder's IDE, Boa will look really similar.
The xml files that Glade generates can be easily used
Lee,
Gerald's response should be considered the official response from
FlexRadio on the less than perfect eham review. (link below)
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/2005-Octob
er/002698.html
Consider the following my personal response:
Note that we have never
Let me address a few more concerns:
RFI: Most of us are aware that a radiating
feedline could cause RFI in the shack.
I definitely have a problem here. Alan Davis, N2WS, helped explain why.
Basically, I built a cheapo G5RV without the balun at the feedpoint (based
on bad advise, many field
John,
The current hardware is not QSK as the time required to switch the TR
relays at this point is 50ms minimum. This doesn't mean that someone
(including FlexRadio) will not figure out a way to modify the hardware
for QSK. It just means that the current hardware will not do better
than Semi
Just to cast a note of reality here..
The development environments that MS produces are not aimed at a target
market of low budget hobby or casual coders, but rather, at people doing
software development full time. In that context, requiring a PC for
development that costs $5-10K is a
I'd like to reiterate the reasonable prices on
developer-level hobbyist machines : One can get
refurbished HP machines (hpshopping.com) with 3.2 GHz
processors and speedy buses, 200Gb storage, etc. that
work great for developers (1GB of RAM) for $699.00.
Sure, it's running Windows XP Home, but
Anybody notice a
chirpwhile receivinga loud CW signal?It is noticeable when the
AGC voltage is decaying. It takes an S9 or better signal and it makes a
difference at what setting you have the AGC set for but, is deffinately there.
It seems to be peculiar to 1.4.5 because it doesn't happen
Reality check 101
1. This is a hobbyist email list, we don't go spending $100K on a
development system nor $10K on a PC
2. Microsoft makes a $130 version of the software, that's the one for
professionals that will also have to buy a $3K computer to run the
$130 piece of software.
3. We are
20 matches
Mail list logo
