On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, David Megginson wrote:
Tell me more about how they handle -- I understand that they're light
on the controls.
They are - I started out in them when I was 14, and didn't have any
problem handling it then. Also fully aerobatic, provided you remember
that there's no inverted
Jon Stockill writes:
They are - I started out in them when I was 14, and didn't have any
problem handling it then. Also fully aerobatic, provided you remember
that there's no inverted fuel system on them, so leaving it upside down
with no +ve G on results in a bit of a chugging noise
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 06:45:00 -0400, David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jon Stockill writes:
They are - I started out in them when I was 14, and didn't have any
problem handling it then. Also fully aerobatic, provided you remember
that there's no inverted fuel system on them, so
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 21:56:43 -0400,
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
that -10 to +1 Celsius band that's especially scary, and that's when I
..say +4, or try drop into rain with a _cold_ plane. ;-)
..there is one record of a Norwegian? hanglider pilot on
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 15:22:29 +0200, Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:56:17 +0100,
Rick Ansell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mk I max TAS at 20,000 ft (where it was fastest): c. 350 mph
..with the wood prop???
The website I found didn't
Is there a reason this can't be moved out of the main loop yet? It's been a
while since it was last discussed, but I thought something was going to be
done with it.
Best,
Jim
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
// Curt is this code used? I don't see any problems when I comment it out.
+
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just like the Spitfire -- the ME-109's fuel-injected engine was one of
the few advantages it had over the Spitfire's gravity-fed, carbureted
engine, if I recall correctly.
IIRC there was an oil issue with the Merlin's inverted as well.
Best,
Jim
Arnt Karlsen writes:
that -10 to +1 Celsius band that's especially scary, and that's when I
..say +4, or try drop into rain with a _cold_ plane. ;-)
Absolutely right. The problem is that the fuel in the wing tanks
takes a long time to warm up, so if you've been flying cold long
enough
Jim Wilson writes:
IIRC there was an oil issue with the Merlin's inverted as well.
A gravity-fed wet sump, perhaps?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:13:11 -, Jim Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just like the Spitfire -- the ME-109's fuel-injected engine was one of
the few advantages it had over the Spitfire's gravity-fed, carbureted
engine, if I recall correctly.
IIRC
He felt that to fly near minimums
you needed to be flying on a daily basis, even though you can maintain
certification without doing anything like that.
I think he is oversimplifying. You can easily do minimums, at night and
in completely smooth air and stratus clouds, at your home airport
Just an update on this.
I can re-arrange the default keboard (and presumably js - haven't tried yet)
bindings from the default settings in preferences by entries in the a/c
set.xml file.
This means I can change the brake set-up from one gear and three wheels, with
a brake on each wheel, to
Bodo von Thadden wrote:
Hello
I try to build Flightgear again. The last time, it was several months ago.
I
still use MSVC6 as Compiler.
The compiler stucks in the file: ssgEntityArray.cxx on line 67.
Kompilierung läuft...
ssgEntityArray.cxx
f:\source\src\objects\ssgentityarray.cxx(67) :
At 7/26/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Is there a reason this can't be moved out of the main loop yet? It's been a
while since it was last discussed, but I thought something was going to be
done with it.
The patch was one I submitted to Erik.
How about this solution for now: Simply delete or comment out
Alex Perry writes:
However, the OAT instrument is often not mounted in the panel and is
instead located in one of the overhead air vents. Unless you're using
the 3D cockpit, that region is not normally in a FGFS display window.
This leaves the obvious question of where we should show OAT
Looks like you're getting into a mess with these defines (particularly this one):
#define ch aircraft_-ch
as it conflicts with a variable in my sstream by the same name.
See output:
depmode=gcc3 /bin/sh ../../../depcomp \
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src/Include -I../../..
You might want to just wrap everything (below the includes) in namespace uiuc {}.
Best,
Jim
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
At 7/27/03, you wrote:
Looks like you're getting into a mess with these defines (particularly
this one):
#define ch aircraft_-ch
If I renamed ch, would
Hi...
I'm starting to get the instruments onto the Cassutt Racer and came accross
one that is called CH or C HT or something like that... and I don't have any
idea what it is...
I've thought about it but my brain can't come up with the answer so thought
I'd ask here as most of you probably
18 matches
Mail list logo
