David Megginson writes:
Monday evening I updated SimGear, the source, and data from cvs. The
dc3.xml file in Aicraft-yasim was changed for the worse (IMHO).
I'll be happy to put it back to what it was, but it might be better if
you could spend a little time fiddling with the XML file so
Lee Elliott wrote:
On Thursday 07 August 2003 20:14, Matevz Jekovec wrote:
I downloaded the latest CVS version of FlightGear and took an evening
flight from Ljubljana airport (LJLJ) in Slovenia around. The framerate
was from 13-15 FPS, I had no CTDs and new lighting effects are
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 11:23:07 -0500
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but it may give us many more options for moving forward with new and
better graphic effects.
My uneducated, gut feeling, leads me to opt for the route
that gives the most promise for the future.
Jon
David Megginson wrote:
Here's a JPEG of the default 172 finishing a landing roll at CYTZ
Toronto/City Centre (aka Toronto Island) with the CN Tower in the
background:
http://www.megginson.com/flightsim/cytz.jpg
Nice picture!
There is nowhere obvious to put this right now, but if anyone is
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 17:41:33 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you are flying fast enough (i.e. a dive). Any
suggestions? JSBSim
does not handle windmilling properly either.
Any suggestions?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL
Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If we're already talking about engines: has anyone looked at the 747
fuel consumption yet? The 747-yasim model seems to need way too much
fuel. Even if I increase the fuel fraction to 1.0 in the XML file I'm
unable to fly the plane across the Atlantic
Can anyone tell me what the confstatX directories I keep getting in my
build directories is?
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Dave Perry wrote (but never attached the file):
David Megginson writes:
Monday evening I updated SimGear, the source, and data from cvs. The
dc3.xml file in Aicraft-yasim was changed for the worse (IMHO).
I'll be happy to put it back to what it was, but it might be better if
you could spend
Lee Elliott wrote:
There is nowhere obvious to put this right now, but if anyone is
interested, I'll be happy to send the appropriate files privately. It
will work best with the w080n40 scenery at
http://www.randdtechnologies.com/fgfs/newScenery/world-scenery.html
Perhaps we need
Norman Vine writes:
I am wondering what having multiple paths to search will do for 'stutter'
and as far as LandMarks go I can't really see why they don't just go in the
standard scenery file as since they are LandMarks they probably only
apply to one location :-)
It's more of an
On Friday 08 August 2003 20:18, Norman Vine wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Curtis L.
Olson
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:38 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: RFD: Landmarks and scenery (was Re:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
and as far as LandMarks go I can't really see why they don't just
go in the standard scenery file as since they are LandMarks they
probably only apply to one location :-)
It's more of an administrative convenience, not strictly necessary,
but useful for
Curtis L. Olson writes:
I know what you are saying, but this may not be possible if the path
needs to be set systemwide for a multi-platform installation. Or if
it goes in the preferences.xml file or something like that. We really
could use a universal, platform independent delimeter in
as long as you use FlightGear everyday. Probably I don't represent the
'average' FlightGear user so my opinion might not be everyone's. Still I
have to say that for _me_ it's far to complex.
I don't see FlightGear as a 'game' with thousands of views but more as a
simulator that
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like that idea.
I have also a question:
Why do we use /usr/local/Flightgear as directory and not
/usr/local/games/Flightgear ?
I would prefer /usr/local/games/Flightgear for everything,
the scenery, the game data and the runtime binary
I've thought in terms of a server that could manage a high volume of
aircraft. It would send back the locations of only the
closest/visible aircraft and not the entire set.
We had a so called bubble surrounding the aircraft in Falcon. And we had
2 types of units: aggregated and deaggregated.
On Friday 08 August 2003 03:37, David Megginson wrote:
Here's a JPEG of the default 172 finishing a landing roll at CYTZ
Toronto/City Centre (aka Toronto Island) with the CN Tower in the
background:
http://www.megginson.com/flightsim/cytz.jpg
That looks pretty good - I want one:)
I
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 01:15:11 +0200,
Matevz Jekovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've seen some Linux distros not having /usr/*local*/bin in their
path. (only /bin and /usr/bin for ordanary user). What is the main
difference between /usr/local/something and
today's cvs update seems to have broken the loading of the scenery.
does anybody else see this?
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with |
| automatism and other passive states) to
19 matches
Mail list logo
