Just as a feedback as projects like this might help to make FlightGear
more popular:
http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=127&topic_id=28692&mesg_id=28692&page=
Regards
Georg
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightg
On Thursday 28 Jul 2005 15:15, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Dave Culp
>
> ... snip ...
>
> > The present system makes smoke/contrails by releasing AI
> > objects rapidly. There are three problems with it now:
> >
> > 1) Orienting the objects properly. Only applies for long
> > (i.e. cylindrical,
> > re
I know that the fg magnetic compass code models errors due to tilt
pretty well, but it occurs to me that a lot of these compasses are
gimbaled and remain flat for a few degrees as the plane tilts. Is this
aspect modeled?
Josh
___
Flightgear-devel mailin
Hi,
I'm currently working on two panels to eumulate a Piper Seminole and a Piper
Seneca (both piston twins). I already managed to build a few things:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/fgfs-screen-003.jpg
There is an old-fashioned analog utc-clock, a RMI with two needles for ADF and
VOR, a radar altimeter (li
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:34:13 -0700 (PDT), Craig wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello all,
>
> Where do I find this aircraft. Is it released yet?
..chk down the $FGROOT/data/aircraft/ tree.
> Craig
>
> Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:48:01 -0500, Dave
> From: Erik Hofman
>
> Jim Wilson wrote:
> >>From: Erik Hofman
>
> >>Which they do, they clearly added modified versions of FlightGear
> >>configuration files to the systems and sound directory.
> >>
> >>If they want us to respect their copyright I expect them to respect ours
> >>and make clea
Great,
my first bug free modification ;0
ThanksErik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Craig,> I am new to flightgear, and a moderatly experienced programmer. I> have some mods that I would like to make to the FGFS program, really> more as a learning exercise than anything else.> > I have dow
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:20:38 +0200, Erik wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andy Ross wrote:
>
> > Basically, it seems to me like these guys are fine, with a few
> > nit-picky exceptions like the joystick configuration. I don't think
>
> Yes, but why the joystick configuration and not the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which they do, they clearly added modified versions of FlightGear
configuration files to the systems and sound directory.
If they want us to respect their copyright I expect them to respect ours
and make clean which versions are derived from FlightGear and hence are
s
Hi Craig,
I am new to flightgear, and a moderatly experienced programmer. I
have some mods that I would like to make to the FGFS program, really
more as a learning exercise than anything else.
I have downloaded the code, and all of the documentation I could
find, and I decid
>Which they do, they clearly added modified versions of FlightGear
>configuration files to the systems and sound directory.
>If they want us to respect their copyright I expect them to respect ours
>and make clean which versions are derived from FlightGear and hence are
>still GPL.
>Erik
Yo
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2005 à 19:07 +0200, Harald JOHNSEN a écrit :
> >I think Harald is working on this as an offshoot of his 3d clouds. I'm quite
> >sure we can't do better with the AI ballistic approach as it stands.
> >
> >Vivian
> Not really working on it atm becaue I need to advance on the sh
Andy Ross wrote:
Basically, it seems to me like these guys are fine, with a few
nit-picky exceptions like the joystick configuration. I don't think
Yes, but why the joystick configuration and not the sound configuration
(which was created by me for the c172) for instance.
we need to raise
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Dave Culp
... snip ...
The present system makes smoke/contrails by releasing AI objects rapidly.
There are three problems with it now:
1) Orienting the objects properly. Only applies for long (i.e.
cylindrical,
rectangular) models.
2) Matching the release rate to t
Erik Hofman wrote:
> You can always argue what would be derived work: just the modified files
> or the complete package. Personally I would say the first.
Modifying a file is, pretty obviously, creating a "derived work" under
any reasonable interpretation. :)
> There is no argument possible about
Hello all,
I am new to flightgear, and a moderatly experienced programmer. I have some mods that I would like to make to the FGFS program, really more as a learning exercise than anything else.
I have downloaded the code, and all of the documentation I could find, and I decided to get my feet wet
Hello all,
Where do I find this aircraft. Is it released yet?
CraigArnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:48:01 -0500, Dave wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:> > Since the MB-339 PAN is an on-going project, we plan to release> > an improved version of the aircraft (wi
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
> Andy is, of course, right. We should not send binary data over the
> wire and I think that using XDR for transmission
Binary is fine. Uncooked memory is not. :) And FWIW, XDR seems
awfully heavyweight to me. It involves a comparatively large amount
of code for things th
Jim Wilson wrote:
From: Erik Hofman
Which they do, they clearly added modified versions of FlightGear
configuration files to the systems and sound directory.
If they want us to respect their copyright I expect them to respect ours
and make clean which versions are derived from FlightGear an
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:48:01 -0500, Dave wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Since the MB-339 PAN is an on-going project, we plan to release
> > an improved version of the aircraft (with smokes?).
>
> We have smoke/contrails now, but they need a lot of work:
>
> http://home.comcast.n
> From: Erik Hofman
>
> Erik Hofman wrote:
>
> > As long as they haven't used *any* FlightGear supplied code, sound
> > files, textures, configuration files or anything else included in the
> > base package, they can do whatever they want.
> >
> > If, however, they have used one or more parts
> From: Erik Hofman
>
> Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> > We could wonder about the License compatibility with GNU.
> >
> > FlighGear Team should probably discuss that with HCI Lab of the
> > University of Udine, before official FG distribution.
> > That licence goes against our "up to now policy".
> >
Erik Hofman wrote:
and make clean which versions are derived from FlightGear and hence are
Eh, ... clear, "make clear which files are derived" ...
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/ma
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm glad that you appreciate our work.
>
> Don't miss the video about the making of the MB-339 PAN.
> We have slightly modified FlightGear source code to enable
> an head tracking sensor for controlling the cockpit view.
> The video shows the Capt. Tammaro during th
Erik Hofman wrote:
As long as they haven't used *any* FlightGear supplied code, sound
files, textures, configuration files or anything else included in the
base package, they can do whatever they want.
If, however, they have used one or more parts included in the base
package, then their wor
Hi Augusto,
.. I cc'd you this because the licensing discussion here is relevant to
your MB339. :o)
..for the rest of you guys, this discusses why-n-how the GPL is
_the_ superior commersial and academic license, IMHO. ;o)
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:15:44 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
<[EMAIL PR
Gerard Robin wrote:
We could wonder about the License compatibility with GNU.
FlighGear Team should probably discuss that with HCI Lab of the
University of Udine, before official FG distribution.
That licence goes against our "up to now policy".
The HCI Lab licence look like many External devel
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:39:34 +0100, Dave wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Congratulation to the Author.
> >
> > The flight is wonderful, very accurate.
> >
> > Only little difficulties under Linux with the "Upper-case,
> > Lower-case" mixing (direct.xml => Direct.xml, *.ase => *.ASE,
Dave Culp
... snip ...
>
> The present system makes smoke/contrails by releasing AI objects rapidly.
> There are three problems with it now:
>
> 1) Orienting the objects properly. Only applies for long (i.e.
> cylindrical,
> rectangular) models.
>
> 2) Matching the release rate to the airpla
> Is it better to ask to the Author to solve it?
> I did it on my side
>
> We could wonder about the License compatibility with GNU.
>
> FlighGear Team should probably discuss that with HCI Lab of the
> University of Udine, before official FG distribution.
> That licence goes against our "up
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2005 à 14:39 +0100, Dave Martin a écrit :
> > Congratulation to the Author.
> >
> > The flight is wonderful, very accurate.
> >
> > Only little difficulties under Linux with the "Upper-case, Lower-case"
> > mixing (direct.xml => Direct.xml, *.ase => *.ASE, instruments name, and
Dave Culp wrote:
3) Making a smoke model that merges well with the others. I've heard (on
this list) that this may be a plib limitation. It may require the use of a
different visual model, like billboards or particle fields.
I'm sure someone has already done some work on particle smoke. IS
> Since the MB-339 PAN is an on-going project, we plan to release
> an improved version of the aircraft (with smokes?).
We have smoke/contrails now, but they need a lot of work:
http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/contrails.jpg
They look OK from some angles, and look bad from others. I tri
> Congratulation to the Author.
>
> The flight is wonderful, very accurate.
>
> Only little difficulties under Linux with the "Upper-case, Lower-case"
> mixing (direct.xml => Direct.xml, *.ase => *.ASE, instruments name, and
> flap => Flap).
>
> Arrh MS Windows.
>
I would fix the faults and m
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:47:26 +0200, Gerard wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le mercredi 27 juillet 2005 à 23:15 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
> > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:18:34 +0200, Gerard wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > I did NOT ask for deleting that piece of code w
> Since the MB-339 PAN is an on-going project, we plan to release
> an improved version of the aircraft (with smokes?). If anyone
> at flightgear.org would like to link our MB-339 PAN project in
> the "Related Projects" section, we would be very happy.
>Bye, Augusto.
I will mention it in the u
I'm glad that you appreciate our work.
Don't miss the video about the making of the MB-339 PAN.
We have slightly modified FlightGear source code to enable
an head tracking sensor for controlling the cockpit view.
The video shows the Capt. Tammaro during the beta-testing of
our "Low-Cost Immersi
> > > Nice model. I particularly like the horizon ball.
> >
> > I particularly like the fact that they used FlightGear :-D
>
> And I also like the fact that they used JSBSim and started with aeromatic :)
>
> Dave
:-) Ahhh, the aeromatic scent of a newly released flight model. In the morning.
W
> > Nice model. I particularly like the horizon ball.
>
> I particularly like the fact that they used FlightGear :-D
And I also like the fact that they used JSBSim and started with aeromatic :)
Dave
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@fl
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2005 à 08:37 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> At this site http://hcilab.uniud.it/pan you can download the results of a
> joint
> project between the HCI Lab of the University of Udine
> and the aerobatic team of the Italian Air Force (the
> Frecce Tricolori).
>
> The Lab
Vivian Meazza wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At this site http://hcilab.uniud.it/pan you can download the results of a
joint
project between the HCI Lab of the University of Udine
and the aerobatic team of the Italian Air Force (the
Frecce Tricolori).
The Lab has produced a detailed, flyable model
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> At this site http://hcilab.uniud.it/pan you can download the results of a
> joint
> project between the HCI Lab of the University of Udine
> and the aerobatic team of the Italian Air Force (the
> Frecce Tricolori).
>
> The Lab has produced a detailed, flyable model
> of
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
With help from Norman I fixed the alignment in the used headers. The
patch is available at http://www.o-schroeder.de/fg_server/patch.php
But this patch again fixes only symtoms, not the problems. I suggest to
put it into cvs anyway, as it will enable the majority to get
At this site http://hcilab.uniud.it/pan you can download the results of a joint
project between the HCI Lab of the University of Udine
and the aerobatic team of the Italian Air Force (the
Frecce Tricolori).
The Lab has produced a detailed, flyable model
of the MB-339 PAN jet. The leader of the F
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
>On Mittwoch 27 Juli 2005 14:55, Vivian Meazza wrote:
>
>
>>It's a quick and dirty hack. Oliver and Norman are working on a proper fix.
>>It compiles on gcc 3.4.4-1. If Cygwin users want to use multiplayer, then
>>this patch allows it. It certainly should not find its way
Josh Babcock wrote:
I am making a flux gate compass instrument that is gyro stabilized. Is
there a property that reflects heading with magnetic declination but
does not read incorrectly in a dive or bank?
I think it's called:
/orientation/heading-magnetic-deg
Erik
__
46 matches
Mail list logo
