On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 02:35, Jon Stockill wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Vivian Meazza wrote:
delightful to fly, and forgiving in combat manoeuvre. Unlike the Typhoon and
the Tempest the engine didn't stop or the tail fall off, although if you
really went mad you could break the wings. It was
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 00:57, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Vivian Meazza -- Thursday 04 March 2004 09:44:
Vivian, Vyvyan = male
Bah ... you were kidding, weren't you?
http://images.google.com/images?q=vivian
m. :-P
Watch the BBC's 80's comedy, the Young Ones, the punk was called
Sorry for the OT message:
Just got http://www.linuxsimulations.org up and running again,
seriously lacking in much at the moment. Hopefully will be better this
time! Especially as I live in a house, much less likely to be moving
soon :).
Many thanks,
Matt
PS Also now back with broadband
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 11:55, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Hi, quick announcement ... baby! Amelia Esther, 8lbs 1oz, born 6:12am this
morning, less than 1 hour from first contraction to delivery. 12 minutes
from arrival at the hospital to delivery. Everyone is doing good. I'll be
pretty much
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 16:17, David Megginson wrote:
Andy Ross writes:
In an attempt to depoliticize the combat flame war as much as
possible, it's worth pointing out that, irrespective of people's
opinions on the matter, there are not a lot of combat features we
can really avoid
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 22:19, Lee Elliott wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2003 01:21, Andy Ross wrote:
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Thought I'd take a stab at this, decided to try and make a 3D
rendition of the Sea Harrier, especially since we have the Harrier in
FG, but without a 3D
snip
Eeep, was working late
http://pwp.netzon.net/~stargoat/Shar/sharskel.ac
I'm afraid that link doesn't work for me:(
LeeE
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 13:15, Lee Elliott wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2003 20:59, Matthew Johnson wrote:
snip
Eeep, was working late
http://pwp.netzon.net/~stargoat/Shar/sharskel.ac
I'm afraid that link doesn't work for me:(
LeeE
Got it - needs a bit more
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 17:21, Andy Ross wrote:
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Thought I'd take a stab at this, decided to try and make a 3D
rendition of the Sea Harrier, especially since we have the Harrier in
FG, but without a 3D model (I think it needs one!).
So far I have started
Good day,
Thought I'd take a stab at this, decided to try and make a 3D
rendition of the Sea Harrier, especially since we have the Harrier in
FG, but without a 3D model (I think it needs one!).
So far I have started by looking for a plan that I can follow, but have
only found a 3 view plan
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 18:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jon S Berndt -- Wednesday 01 October 2003 22:41:
Could anyone provide a screen dump image of this aircraft flying in
FlightGear?
Not exactly flying, but ...
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a8603365/fgfs10.jpeg (70kB)
m.
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 16:54, Norman Vine wrote:
To all concerned
May we please put this thread to rest and allow FGFS
to return to soaring above petty OS bigotry
Yes! No one cares about which OS you're using (I really do not!). Or
applications, please take David's contention based on what
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 01:25, Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Not at all. Things go wrong in airliners flown by scheduled carriers
all the time, and usually no one suffers anything more than stress
from a delay or rerouting. Injuries and fatalities are very rare in
scheduled airline incidents or
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 04:19, Tony Peden wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 14:08, David Megginson wrote:
Matthew Johnson writes:
Good point, something goes wrong on a commercial airliner very few,
if anyone ever gets out alive...
Not at all. Things go wrong in airliners flown
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 23:48, Mally wrote:
Oh well, it's fun to pick on MS, and they do deserve most of it, if
for no other reason to pressure them to do better. But you will have
security problems and issues no matter what software and OS you run.
It may be fun, but when it extends
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 11:23, Mally wrote:
Matt
The main swipes aren't so much at end users, as most just run what the
computer came with, I am running Outlook Express because thats what
came with the computer, this is the most common scenario, oh and it
doesn't matter how much MS
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 11:11, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Arnt Karlsen writes:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:09:51 -0500,
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..to put it short: picture yourself on your single seat bike going
full bore on the freeway just like
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 20:24, David Culp wrote:
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Animal could be a Swallow...
African or European?
Errr..I don't know...
Matt
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:31, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Just an update on the A320 model :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-02.png
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-03.png
Hmmm, I _like_ your patriotism ;-)
Thanks,
On a
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 09:25, Martin Spott wrote:
snip
p.s. Why isn't there an O'Reilly FlightGear book yet? What mascot
should they use?
Do we have a FlightGear icon for Windows-/KDE-/Gnome-Desktops ? ;-)
FlightGear icon...What would that look like, if I had the money a
competition
Hi,
Just flying the B52 with all engines running, manually took her up to
10,000 feet, engaged autopilot to take her down to 1000 feet and to plot
a course back to KSF0.
Of course, minds do wander, so I messed with the cloud settings and
tried to make everything clear. Unfortunately I ended up
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 23:46, Matthew Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Just flying the B52 with all engines running, manually took her up to
10,000 feet, engaged autopilot to take her down to 1000 feet and to plot
a course back to KSF0.
Of course, minds do wander, so I messed with the cloud settings
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 19:59, Jim Wilson wrote:
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think Lee did an amazing job w/ the model.
He sure did. It is excellent work.
Always amazing work from Lee. Wonder how quick it is for him to throw a
plane together?
I think he used several
We should also point out that the p51d is no slouch either. Jim has
done a *lot* of work on the 3d interior as well.
Very very true, trying to build a plane with ac3D and its a *lot* of
work. The p51D exudes power and performance in FlightGear and that is
not easy to accomplish.
You're
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Matthew Law wrote:
On Thursday 03 April 2003 22:01, David Megginson wrote:
I've simulated soft-field takeoffs on long, paved runways many times,
and used the technique for real a few times this winter to get up
before snow, ice, and slushy puddles in the middle of
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, James Turner wrote:
Since the base cvs was brought back up, I haven't been able to update
it:
I get:
cvs server: Updating .
cvs [server aborted]: cannot stat /tmpcvslck: No such file or directory
cvs [server aborted]: cannot stat /tmpcvslck: No such file or directory
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 08:47, Jon Stockill wrote:
I had a trip to the South Yorkshire Air Museum this weekend - and now have
silly amounts of data.
I currently have in my grubby little mitts a Harrier GR3 aircrew manual,
and a cd with a boat load of cockpit photos.
I also have the offer of
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 06:42, Jon Berndt wrote:
For those of you who may not have heard, the Space Shuttle Columbia
appears to have broken up on entry as it passed south of Dallas while at a
speed of mach 10+.
Oh my God :(.
No other words I am afraid...
Any thoughts on what may have happened?
On 1 Feb 2003, Tony Peden wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 14:56, Jon Berndt wrote:
No doubt now that the focus will be on the left wing. But I'm
wondering, is
there anything that could have been done had the assessment gone the
other way?
..heavy sigh...
I do not believe so.
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 14:19, David Donohue wrote:
As a little old New Zealander I am having trouble getting FlightGear
to compile on Mandrake 9.0.
The problem lies with SimGear-0.3.1 where I get the following message:
SkyContext.cpp
In constructor 'SkyContext::SkyContext()
invalid
Do the instructions on http://linuxsimulations.org help even a bit?
Wrote it myself, let me know if it makes sense :). Tried to break the
process down as much as possible.
Matt
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 07:56, Mike Bonar wrote:
Please help a newbie out. I am a little confused about how to stay up
at Duxford if you get the
chance too.
--
Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
--
Matthew Johnson
Public Key
9560 AE15 A443 7FE5 E927 84D2 CD17 CF25 405C B240
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
a potentially good model.
Perhaps they should have waited until version 1.0 of Flight Gear came
out and waited for a binary...
--
Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org
bug). The fix
listed here fixed my issue.
--
Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
35 matches
Mail list logo
