Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Jon Stockill a écrit :
Assuming there's a unique ID in the DOF (I've not seen the file yet)
I'll maintain an exclusions list, so that when an updated DOF is
imported such buildings can be ignored because we have a better
version available.
Quoting Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Jon Stockill a écrit :
Assuming there's a unique ID in the DOF (I've not seen the file yet)
I'll maintain an exclusions list, so that when an updated DOF is
imported such buildings can be ignored because we have a better
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Quoting Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Are these generic buildings now officilally part of the database?
I don't know if it is official, but they are in the database I downloaded
recently.
Cool, that would make the scenery much more realistic IMHO.
I think the problem is
Quoting Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Quoting Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Are these generic buildings now officilally part of the database?
I don't know if it is official, but they are in the database I downloaded
recently.
Cool, that would make the
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I think this is nearly impossible to have the position that match. It should be
better to have areas of exclusion, either rectangular ( 2 points ), or circular
( center + radius ).
Unless the database allows one to replace the model you are right. I
think a 100 meter
BTW. Just for the sake of completeness, the models created by Unknown
are all created by me:
http://fgfsdb.stockill.org/author.php?id=1
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 09:37, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I think this is nearly impossible to have the position that match. It should
be
better to have areas of exclusion, either rectangular ( 2 points ), or
circular
( center + radius ).
-Fred
Could you not have something like RPM's
Erik Hofman wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Quoting Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Are these generic buildings now officilally part of the database?
I don't know if it is official, but they are in the database I downloaded
recently.
Cool, that would make the scenery much more realistic IMHO.
I
Erik Hofman wrote:
BTW. Just for the sake of completeness, the models created by Unknown
are all created by me:
http://fgfsdb.stockill.org/author.php?id=1
Thanks - this is now updated.
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
BTW. Just for the sake of completeness, the models created by
Unknown are all created by me:
Thanks - this is now updated.
Thanks.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Jon Stockill wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
I think the problem is that your models are not listed in the database
then? If they where they would probably overwrite the default ones
(provided they are located at _exactly_ the same location).
They don't need to be *exact* as they're linked by
Jon Stockill a écrit :
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
That's really nice !
But if all these models are placed automagically, what would happen
to model that represent the real buildings ? I mean : if I create the
Empire State Building and put it in fgfsdb, would there be a hole
around it or would it
On 31/01/2005 at 17:19 Chris Metzler wrote:
With building positions and heights from the FAA Digital Obstruction
File, and a few new buriable (thus, height-adjustable) models, here's
an approach into La Guardia Rwy 04, starting over Staten Island.
Chris Metzler wrote:
Chris,
Is there code we can grab to test and look at other areas? Even what
you have is okay for a lot of stuff.
I like the screenshots. Thanks.
Dale
With building positions and heights from the FAA Digital Obstruction
File, and a few new buriable (thus, height-adjustable)
With building positions and heights from the FAA Digital Obstruction
File, and a few new buriable (thus, height-adjustable) models, here's
an approach into La Guardia Rwy 04, starting over Staten Island.
http://www.speakeasy.org/~cmetzler/KLGA_04_approach_001.jpg
thru
Chris Metzler a écrit :
With building positions and heights from the FAA Digital Obstruction
File, and a few new buriable (thus, height-adjustable) models, here's
an approach into La Guardia Rwy 04, starting over Staten Island.
http://www.speakeasy.org/~cmetzler/KLGA_04_approach_001.jpg
thru
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:37:49 +0100
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
That's really nice !
But if all these models are placed automagically, what would happen to
model that represent the real buildings ? I mean : if I create the
Empire State Building and put it in fgfsdb, would there be a hole around
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
That's really nice !
But if all these models are placed automagically, what would happen to
model that represent the real buildings ? I mean : if I create the
Empire State Building and put it in fgfsdb, would there be a hole around
it or would it be in collision with its
18 matches
Mail list logo
