Al West wrote:
Is all this required? Surely the axes mapping difference is consistant.
Do you know that for sure. I don't. Heck I don't even have a joystick,
let alone that I use Linux *or* Windows.
So don't expect much from me until I see a patch and an explanation.
Erik
_
e: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs]CVS:
> > FlightGear/src/Input input.cxx, 1.43, 1.44 input.hxx, 1.17, 1.18
> >
> > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > So we'd need two config files for *every* joystick (with more than
> > > two axes)? That's IMHO not
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 18:20:
> winval = atts.getValue("n_win");// or "windows"
[...]
> if (winval != -1 && current_os == "windows")
[...]
> ... assuming that a non existent attribute returns -1.
It's a string or char* and does of course return 0. :-)
m.
___
* Erik Hofman -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 17:50:
> Right now code other than SimGear's property I/O code can access the
> attributes. To get this working I need to access them in FlightGear, but
> every(?) attribute other than "n=" is disregarded...
I still don't get it. In props_io.cxx:164ff, why
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Andy Ross -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 17:23:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
This is syntactically cleaner, but the code changes required are
severe. XML Attributes in property files are interpreted only by the
SimGear property parser, they aren't available in the resulting
prope
* Andy Ross -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 17:23:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> >
>
> This is syntactically cleaner, but the code changes required are
> severe. XML Attributes in property files are interpreted only by the
> SimGear property parser, they aren't available in the resulting
> property tr
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> Whereby "unix" would be an alias for "n" and the line could also be
> written as
>
>
This is syntactically cleaner, but the code changes required are
severe. XML Attributes in property files are interpreted only by the
SimGear property parser, they aren't available i
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 16:49:
> * Erik Hofman -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 16:37:
> > I bet you can come up with a clever solution where only the platform
> > specific part are in the actual configuration file and everything else
> > gets included from a shared file ...
>
>
* Erik Hofman -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 16:37:
> I bet you can come up with a clever solution where only the platform
> specific part are in the actual configuration file and everything else
> gets included from a shared file ...
Rudder
property-scale
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 16:21:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
So we'd need two config files for *every* joystick (with more than
two axes)? That's IMHO not acceptable.
Not acceptable won't do in this case unless I see something show up
that is elegant and that works
On Dienstag, 27. April 2004 16:33, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Erik Hofman -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 16:21:
> > Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > > So we'd need two config files for *every* joystick (with more than
> > > two axes)? That's IMHO not acceptable.
> >
> > Not acceptable won't do in this case unles
* Erik Hofman -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 16:21:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> > So we'd need two config files for *every* joystick (with more than
> > two axes)? That's IMHO not acceptable.
> Not acceptable won't do in this case unless I see something show up
> that is elegant and that works in ever
to virtual axes as defined in the file.
Richard
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Hofman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 April 2004 3:21 pm
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs]CVS:
> FlightGear/src
Erik Hofman wrote:
> After endless times of no discussion and no solutions I hacked
> something together that works for every situation. Not acceptable
> won't do in this case unless I see something show up that is elegant
> and that works in every situation.
Agreed. We need to get something actu
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
So we'd need two config files for *every* joystick (with more than
two axes)? That's IMHO not acceptable. I'd rather prefer a mechanism
that makes one and the same config file work for both systems then.
After endless times of no discussion and no solutions I hacked something
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 06:58:41 -0700
Andy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Many/most of the joysticks don't work for windows users. They
download the program, try it, and then complain when the "view is
constantly spinning around". One presumes the axis mappings are
simply different between the pla
* Frederic Bouvier -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 15:49:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > Because Unix and Windows don't always agree on axis numeration.
>
> In fact, they never agree. axis 2 & 3 are reverted, and the hat has
> different numbering, for the same joystick name.
So we'd need two config files
Jim Wilson wrote:
> Erik Hofman checked in:
> > Make it possible to define a tag in the joystick
> > configuration file. This would make it possible to have different
> > configuration files for Windows. Possible values are: Windows, UNIX
> > or All. Not specifying the tag equals to 'All'.
>
> Ju
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Jim Wilson -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 15:12:
> > Erik Hofman said:
> > > Make it possible to define a tag in the joystick
> > > configuration file. This would make it possible to have different
> > > configuration files for Windows.
>
> > Just curious, why is this required?
* Jim Wilson -- Tuesday 27 April 2004 15:12:
> Erik Hofman said:
> > Make it possible to define a tag in the joystick
> > configuration file. This would make it possible to have different
> > configuration files for Windows.
> Just curious, why is this required?
Because Unix and Windows don't a
Erik Hofman said:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/src/Input
> In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv26245
>
> Modified Files:
> input.cxx input.hxx
> Log Message:
> Make it possible to define a tag in the joystick
configuration file. This would make it possible to have different
21 matches
Mail list logo