RE: [Flightgear-devel] Building on Cygwin

2005-03-31 Thread Richard Bytheway
I have the same problem with Main/renderer.cxx. Your solution (or one very like it) solves the problem. I guess near/far are reserved words in Cygwin? Thereafter, FGFS compiles and runs under Cygwin. I'm not using Andy's libs, but those built by Norman, with a couple of tweaks which

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Building on Cygwin

2005-03-31 Thread Vivian Meazza
Richard Bytheway wrote I have the same problem with Main/renderer.cxx. Your solution (or one very like it) solves the problem. I guess near/far are reserved words in Cygwin? Thereafter, FGFS compiles and runs under Cygwin. I'm not using Andy's libs, but those built by Norman,

[Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Aircraft/fokker100/Models

2005-03-31 Thread Martin Spott
Hello Erik, Erik Hofman wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/fokker100/Models In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv14144 Modified Files: f70_cabin.ac fokker70.ac fokker70.xml Log Message: Some final changes, fixes and updates for some time The model looks very nice

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Building on Cygwin

2005-03-31 Thread Erik Hofman
Vivian Meazza wrote: Never noticed that; I keep FGFS at a higher level, but now that you mention it, so it does. It's not a problem, but we ought to record all this somewhere. We seem to go through some Cygwin drama every major update. That's what Wiki's are for:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Aircraft/fokker100/Models

2005-03-31 Thread Erik Hofman
Martin Spott wrote: The model looks very nice and the handling feels pretty easy. It's only Thanks. that I'm missing the cabin door being coupled to the parking brake as it was in your first version ;-) No, it's not ... :-) Erik ___ Flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [Flightgear-cvslogs]

2005-03-31 Thread Martin Spott
Erik Hofman wrote: Martin Spott wrote: that I'm missing the cabin door being coupled to the parking brake as it was in your first version ;-) No, it's not ... Hmmm, I don't understand: Did you decouple the cabin door from the parking brake intentionally because you thing the coupling is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Building on Cygwin

2005-03-31 Thread Jim Wilson
From: Andy Ross Vivian Meazza wrote: I have the same problem with Main/renderer.cxx. Your solution (or one very like it) solves the problem. I guess near/far are reserved words in Cygwin? Goodness, that brings back memories. The near and far keywords are holdovers from 16 bit DOS

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Building on Cygwin

2005-03-31 Thread Vivian Meazza
Erik Hofman wrote Vivian Meazza wrote: Never noticed that; I keep FGFS at a higher level, but now that you mention it, so it does. It's not a problem, but we ought to record all this somewhere. We seem to go through some Cygwin drama every major update. That's what Wiki's are for:

[Flightgear-devel] Re: plib viewer

2005-03-31 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Josh Babcock -- Wednesday 30 March 2005 18:34: Has anyone gotten the viewer program from the plib-examples package running? When I compile and run it I get: WARNING: fntLoadTXF: Failed to open 'data/default.txf' for reading. Works perfectly. And the font is in CVS: $ grep default.txf

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Building on Cygwin

2005-03-31 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Erik Hofman -- Thursday 31 March 2005 13:27: That's what Wiki's are for: http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/flight_gear/flight_gear_developer_documentation.html?wpid=123227 That's really where the FAQ should be maintained, too, as long as someone is regularly archiving the contents. (I tried with

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Building on Cygwin

2005-03-31 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Erik Hofman -- Thursday 31 March 2005 13:27: That's what Wiki's are for: http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/flight_gear/flight_gear_developer_documentation.html?wpid=123227 That's really where the FAQ should be maintained, too, as long as someone is regularly archiving

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: fgjs bug

2005-03-31 Thread Andy Ross
Fridtjof Busse wrote: I'd say the X52 then has exactly this problem. One bit is always on, since it has a mode-switch (doesn't do anything without the windows-software) which always has a bit set. You can write a joystick definition to use that mode switch however you want; on all systems.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: fgjs bug

2005-03-31 Thread Fridtjof Busse
* Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd say the X52 then has exactly this problem. One bit is always on, since it has a mode-switch (doesn't do anything without the windows-software) which always has a bit set. You can write a joystick definition to use that mode switch however you want; on