Curtis L. Olson writes:
Christian Mayer writes:
In my case it effects -
simgear/sg_zlib.h, and 2 other headers - no problem. I
usually 'fix' them locally and get on with the compile ...
What is the issue here?
I think that there might be some confusion about whether zlib is
Andy Ross writes:
Geoff McLane wrote:
JSBSim stops after the QNAN's,
and now YASim c172 seems unable to get speed to lift off ...
Just one of those days ...
Odd. Jim Wilson also reported a not enough power situation (with
the YASim 747) that I couldn't reproduce. I didn't
Sergio wrote:
I mean Netscape project was reduced 300% of its souce code after becoming a
open source an Mozila starts. So before that we coul'd also think they were
doing the best. Wouldn't it be some presumptious they are really doing the
best. I don't understand why the don't open all
Alex Perry writes:
Disused airfields are fairly common in the UK, can I suggest the
ability to handle these is something add to the 'to do' list?
Basically, we just need to support closed (X) runways, then make
airports where all the runways are closed. CYOW, my home airport,
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Martin Olveyra -- Friday 25 January 2002 04:08:
The specifications of nvidia drivers are not available for public so it is
not posible to do that, but Nvidia distributes its own driver freely and
works very fine.
Why can be somebody interested on an open source
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 25 January 2002 15:50:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Because SGI recently sold a couple of 3D-graphics patents to Microsoft and
Microsoft could be interested not to license these to companies that
support anything else than DirectX. So Nvidia could drop OpenGL support for
In case anybody has been wondering where the DME display
has gone on the C172
According to David M, DME on a C172 is a rarity. The C182
has it.
The old vfr and ifr panels are still there, just not as the default.
TTYL
John
___
Flightgear-devel
Melchior FRANZ writes:
... which doesn't buy them anything, if MS owns important patents and
wants to push DirectX and hurt other OSes. And don't tell me that they
wouldn't! Neiter Nvidia nor SGI is in control then, and certainly not
the owner of a Nvidia card.
I am not paranoid and I
John Check writes:
In case anybody has been wondering where the DME display
has gone on the C172
According to David M, DME on a C172 is a rarity. The C182
has it.
More specifically, the DME is not on a stock C172R panel (nor is the
MP gauge, which is also gone). We stuck the DME
On Friday 25 January 2002 11:40 am, you wrote:
John Check writes:
In case anybody has been wondering where the DME display
has gone on the C172
According to David M, DME on a C172 is a rarity. The C182
has it.
More specifically, the DME is not on a stock C172R panel (nor is the
John Check writes:
Y'know I really like the way that background looks, but I wonder why you
didn't make it full width.
I did. Use Shift-F7 and Shift-F8 to scroll sideways, Shift-F5 and
Shift-F6 to scroll down and up.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Perry writes:
Disused airfields are fairly common in the UK, can I suggest the
ability to handle these is something add to the 'to do' list?
Basically, we just need to support closed (X) runways, then make
airports where all the runways are closed. CYOW, my home
From my research on the Web, the C172R default panel configuration
(and the typical C172R for sale on the Web) comes with a simple GPS
(not yet modelled), two NAVCOMM radios, ADF, transponder, and
autopilot (no altitude control). There are two VOR gauges, one of
which has a glidescope, and
It's in FG CVS now.
fix it forever ... death to QNAN = bliss :-))
JSBSim - ok, got the new FGInitialCondition.cpp
with vers 1.33 2002:01:24 ... I certainly 'like'
the few added protective if( vt 0.01 ) return 0;
Let's see if that helps ... Also some other
small updates - httpd.cxx,
Alex Perry writes:
I think we'll have a bunch of existing simulator pilots being a bit
surprised how hard navigation is, when you omit DME and have no
moving map...
One interesting suggestion you (Alex) gave to me about a year ago was
to hide the panel and the HUD, then try to make a
Geoff McLane writes:
Must look again how to 'fix' options.cxx
instead of adding -
char * envp = D:\\FGFS\\FlightGear\\Scenery;
Something was said about 'setting' props???
There is a command line option you can specify at run time, or put in
your system.fgfsrc file.
Curt.
--
Curtis
In some ways, it was harder than it would be for a real pilot, since I
didn't have the peripheral vision or the motion cues (I cannot feel
when I'm in a slip, for example, or when I'm descending rapidly, and I
cannot feel any force feedback from the controls).
Don't be too sure; once you're
Alex Perry writes:
Bear in mind that the panel and engine model change for fuel
injection!
We never properly modeled a gravity-fed carburator in the first place,
so I guess we've always had fuel injection. It would be neat to model
an O360 (say), and have the engine splutter whenever
Alex Perry writes:
Also, most aircraft make a noise when seriously uncoordinated (FGFS
does not).
We can, though -- what kind of a noise should it be?
The biggest problem I have is that our textures are too homogeneous
to judge speed well enough to control height. I don't know what we
Jim Wilson wrote,
Check this out: http://aviation.sosu.edu/aircraft/c310.html
and these
http://aviation.sosu.edu/aircraft/aircraft.html
Cool! Thanks
Jeff
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 05:39 PM 1/25/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Alex Perry writes:
Also, most aircraft make a noise when seriously uncoordinated (FGFS
does not).
We can, though -- what kind of a noise should it be?
Kind of a fluttering noise; lots of burbling. Hey, how about dual air jets
to blow air on one
Open source software may also be tested, legally, also to
airworthiness standards. And, by the FAA too.
..which leaves closed source software behind as, _un-certifiable_.
That's true for various categories of avionics, which have coverage tests,
but not for inspection and training tools,
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Geoff McLane wrote:
JSBSim stops after the QNAN's,
and now YASim c172 seems unable to get speed to lift off ...
Just one of those days ...
Odd. Jim Wilson also reported a not enough power situation (with
the YASim 747) that I couldn't reproduce.
We can, though -- what kind of a noise should it be?
Kind of a fluttering noise; lots of burbling.
In high engine power conditions for prop planes, there is another sound
that is due to the prop disk loading being asymmetric when uncoordinated.
The other reason for prop asymmetry is due to
24 matches
Mail list logo
