Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Can we double the power, add some animation, and perhaps more loosely
couple the power plants? Now is when we really could use the ability
to drop ordinance. I don't have the POH in front of me, but I would
think that those particular engines would certainly need to expel
Maybe
we're just a few doing flightgear, but that'll certainly change over
time. Just show those (mostly ignorant) MSFS crowds what flightgear can
do :-)
Just joined the list myself and this was one of only a few main
reasons. I was drawing up homemade control system hardware this afternoon.
Hello, Please note my change of
address e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Bonjour,Veuillez
noter mon changement d'adresse e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/10/03 at 7:05 AM Ivo wrote:
On Monday 08 December 2003 12:00, David Luff wrote:
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/TaxiDraw-0p1p0-src.tar.gz
Source [74K], requires wxWindows to compile (wxGTK-dev on Linux).
I tried it for the first time today, and I ran into some strange things:
On 12/10/03 at 9:50 AM David Luff wrote:
Its definately a bug :-( Unfortunately I can't replicate it - I compile
and run it on both Linux (using gcc-3.2.x where x is a number I don't know
Oops, no, I use 3.2 for FlightGear, but I'm pretty sure I used the stock
Woody compiler for TaxiDraw, which
On 12/8/03 at 11:00 AM David Luff wrote:
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/TaxiDraw4.jpg
The fifth shows that one of the FG runways extends beyond the runway in
the
photo. Either the FG data for this runway is wrong, or it's been extended
since the photo was taken. Can anyone who knows KDPA
On Tuesday 09 Dec 2003 9:37 pm, Norman Vine wrote:
http://perthon.sourceforge.net/
:-)
Interesting - I don't often see two (purportedly) equivalent pieces of code
together like that. I put both examples into files: the python is 668 bytes,
whereas the perl is 1074. Is python really that
Now, that I've edited a few taxiways, I could do with some advice on
airport lighting before sending them off to Robin Peel. Documentation on
taxiway lighting seems quite (very) hard to come by, so could some airport
users give me some advice for various classes of airports. Do aprons have
edge
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, David Luff wrote:
On 12/10/03 at 9:50 AM David Luff wrote:
Its definately a bug :-( Unfortunately I can't replicate it - I compile
and run it on both Linux (using gcc-3.2.x where x is a number I don't know
Oops, no, I use 3.2 for FlightGear, but I'm pretty sure I used
Jonathan Richards wrote:
Interesting - I don't often see two (purportedly) equivalent pieces of code
together like that. I put both examples into files: the python is 668 bytes,
whereas the perl is 1074. Is python really that much more terse than perl,
or is it an artefact of the
Jonathan Richards writes:
On Tuesday 09 Dec 2003 9:37 pm, Norman Vine wrote:
http://perthon.sourceforge.net/
:-)
Interesting - I don't often see two (purportedly) equivalent pieces of code
together like that. I put both examples into files: the python is 668 bytes,
whereas the perl
David Luff writes:
I couldn't find the date the photo's were taken during a cursory search,
If you click on the info button when in the interactive mode
you will get some meta-data to include the 'date' of the photos
For example
Image Info
Info: Digital Ortho-Quadrangles (digitized and
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There's a better way to compare languages:
http://99-bottles-of-beer.ls-la.net/history-and-background.html
Nice. I'm glad they got BC, DIBOL and EmacsLisp covered, hehe. But so far no
RPG II, or 1130 Assembler. Nothing to test on I guess :-)
Jonathan Richards wrote:
Interesting - I don't often see two (purportedly) equivalent pieces
of code together like that. I put both examples into files: the
python is 668 bytes, whereas the perl is 1074. Is python really
that much more terse than perl, or is it an artefact of the
Hi John,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:02:25PM -0800, John Wojnaroski wrote:
Hi Manuel,
I've also talked to John Wojnaroski, He is also building hardware. Maybe
we're just a few doing flightgear, but that'll certainly change over
time. Just show those (mostly ignorant) MSFS crowds what
Manuel Bessler writes:
OK, No problem. Maybe we should really consider a mailinglist for that as Al
has mentioned. Even if it'll be very low traffic.
The question would be whether this would/could be hosted officially
along the other fgfs list, or if we should set up something independet
of
David Luff writes:
Now, that I've edited a few taxiways, I could do with some advice on
airport lighting before sending them off to Robin Peel. Documentation on
taxiway lighting seems quite (very) hard to come by, so could some airport
users give me some advice for various classes of
OK, No problem. Maybe we should really consider a mailinglist for that as
Al
has mentioned. Even if it'll be very low traffic.
The question would be whether this would/could be hosted officially
along the other fgfs list, or if we should set up something independet
of flightgear.org
Curt?
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Manuel Bessler writes:
OK, No problem. Maybe we should really consider a mailinglist for
that as Al has mentioned. Even if it'll be very low traffic.
It's not a ton of work to setup a new mailing list, however, you might
consider just jumping on board with an
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
bitchy
Here you realize the difference between a wannabee enterprise
filesystem and an enterprise filesystem that was designed as such
from the very beginning
/bitchy
The automatic filesystem check is an issue of filesystem
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Luff writes:
Do aprons have edge lighting? Do large GA airports typically have
taxiway edge / center lighting? Small GA airports? Do taxiways
tend to be lit either all or none, or just the main ones sometimes.
I don't think there are hard
If Curt doesn't mind providing the facility, I like the idea.
It would be nice not to be dependant on the facilities offered by people
outside of flightgear to an extent. Also I'm going to be asking a lot of
dumb question about input in flightgear and I don't want it to be too public
;-)
If Curt doesn't mind providing the facility, I like the idea.
It would be nice not to be dependant on the facilities offered by people
outside of flightgear to an extent. Also I'm going to be asking a lot of
dumb question about input in flightgear and I don't want it to be too public
;-)
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
through all that effort, you probably have to just make your best
guess.
The info I've managed to find says that 18m wide taxiways have blue edge
lighting, and 18m wide taxiways have green centreline lighting.
I'll be setting up the airports I'm
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I don't think there are hard and fast rules for this. Ultimately real
people spend real time and real money installing real lights. So a
lot of times, smaller airports with smaller budgets have no taxiway
lighting at all. KDEN has all it's taxiways very well lit, and has
David Megginson writes:
Possibly, but from what I've heard, the main reason for centreline lighting
on runways is to support Cat II and III ILS approaches (down to a 50 ft
ceiling); probably, the same applies to taxiway lighting, since you'll have
ground ops in *extremely* low visibility.
Hi Curt,
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
It's not a ton of work to setup a new mailing list, however, you might
consider just jumping on board with an existing home cockpit group
such as simpits.org. That would make more sense to me since they've
already gone
On 12/10/03 at 2:39 PM David Megginson wrote:
I think that the best thing to do would be to leave taxiway centreline
lighting out by default, and only include it when you have positive
information that it's present in real life (probably only a few airports
in
any country). I'd be very
David Luff wrote:
How about aprons? Most of the airports already done have edge (and center)
lighting defined for pretty much everything, including the aprons. I'm
assuming that small fields won't have that, but larger commercial fields?
That probably depends as much on the apron as the airport
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, David Luff wrote:
It (the atc info) might be fairly RAF field orientated though?
Could be I suppose.
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:38:48PM +0100, Manuel Bessler wrote:
already gone to a lot of effort to collect like minded people.
Well, like minded
Ooops, didn't finish my sentence... this should not have been in my
reply. I was going to write something like like minded in terms of
building,
- Original Message -
From: Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Command Options
John Wojnaroski writes:
Just uploaded the latest FG 09.3 -- quite a step from
32 matches
Mail list logo
