[Flightgear-devel] Weekly CVS Changelog Summary: FlightGear data

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2006-10-29_06:47:11 (mfranz) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/bo105/Models/bo105.xml - adaptation to new property names - names for high/low res LOD =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2006-10-29_19:05:3

[Flightgear-devel] Weekly CVS Changelog Summary: FlightGear source

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2006-10-29_06:34:26 (mfranz) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/scripts/python/FlightGear.py /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/scripts/python/FlightGear.pyc /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/scripts/python/demo.py George PATTERSON: "Flightgear.p

[Flightgear-devel] Weekly CVS Changelog Summary: SimGear

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2006-10-29_13:27:08 (frohlich) /var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/configure.ac /var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/simgear/environment/visual_enviro.cxx Modified Files: configure.ac simgear/environment/visual_enviro.cxx simgear/ephemer

[Flightgear-devel] FGAIManager::getModel()

I've got the following messages (from within plib) recently: fgfs: ssgBase.cxx:78: virtual ssgBase::~ssgBase(): Assertion `refc == 0' failed. Spurious bug; hard to trigger at will. You have to swing a fresh dead mouse from the mousetrap under the sink over your head whilst chanting "Oh Bug of Dark

[Flightgear-devel] trouble installing plib

Hi allI am not able to install plib on a solaris 9 sun machine. I run the ./configure and no errors are shown. When i do "make" i get this error:Error code 1make:fatal error:command failed to target 'pu.o'it gives me 3 error s with the same messages but for the following files : check -recursivecan

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear CVS on amd64

Didier Fabert schrieb: > it's a bit better, now, i can see the splash with message "reading airport > and > navigation data", and crash when the aircraft is loaded (even the lighting). > > Hi Didier, I don't know whether this helps you but I put the latest compiled FG-OSG-CVS bin-folder on my

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend

> A few people took the simulator for a ride and gave suggestions for > possible improvement: > - Have a better graphical user interface inside FlightGear that includes > the functionality of fgrun > - There are not enough buildings in the scenery (especially in the Dutch > Scenery that we were usi

[Flightgear-devel] another (probably OSG-related) simgear compile error

Hello, I've just ran a cvs update on simgear and flightgear (both source and data) and now simgear fails to compile because: make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/share/SimGear/source/simgear/scene/util' Makefile:277: .deps/SGStateAttributeVisitor.Po: No such file or directory Makefile:278: .deps

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend

I think I've said it before, IMHO it can't be said often enough, the effort and the energy you people put into these events leaves me breathless. As always looking forward to the pictures and final report. Cheers Dene > ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear CVS on amd64

it's a bit better, now, i can see the splash with message "reading airport and navigation data", and crash when the aircraft is loaded (even the lighting). -- Didier Fabert [EMAIL PROTECTED] KFreeFlight project : A FlightGear GUI-Frontend designed for KDE users http://kfreeflight.sourceforge.net

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

Hi Olaf, Olaf Flebbe schrieb: > However, FG-OSG compiled using Olaf's stuff (for which we must be most > >> grateful) is both significantly slower to load and run than FG-Plib compiled >> with MSVC8 here. >> > > You actually see a slowdown on loading ? > Didn't notice up to now (but I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

Well, I cant access to the machine I was workin on right now, so I will be able to tell you on monday what the debugger reports. I am using the FG0.9.10 release version , not a cvs version and also the matching SimGear (v.0.3.10) / base package versions. Olaf: I did use the OpenAL version offered

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

However, FG-OSG compiled using Olaf's stuff (for which we must be most > grateful) is both significantly slower to load and run than FG-Plib compiled > with MSVC8 here. You actually see a slowdown on loading ? - Using Tomca

[Flightgear-devel] MSVC8 osg vs plib

Hi, Since Maik and others, including myself, see a very significant slowdown on Windows/MSVC8 with OSG, I wrapped up changes for plib and osg to create a comparable setup for both the plib branch and head of CVS. Look up the updated 2006-11-04 section at http://www.oflebbe.de/oflebbe/FlightGea

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

Olaf Flebbe wrote > Hi, > > > > i noticed that the version of flightgear i built from scratch using > > cygwin takes significantly more time to start up (about 4-5 > > minutes) than the one i installed using the exe-file from > > flightgear.org (about 1-2 minutes). is there

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

I also did this, with the same result, but then I downloaded the project files from cvs, and everything compiled, after a couple of minor corrections. There were a number of warnings about debugging. I can’t explain it, but I guess there was something subtly different in the set up here.  

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenScenegraph MSVC8

Hi, >> But there is one problem with the running flightgear than: it's about a >> factor 2 slower than the flightgear with plib (and shadows on)! >> I don't know if this can be improved with other compiler flags, but I am >> a little bit surprised. >> >> I moved the pre-osg branch to the sa

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend

Good job Durk and Robin, thanks for the report and for all your work!  I'm looking forward to the pictures!  These shows are a *lot* of fun, but also a *lot* of work and can be very exhausting.Curt. On 11/4/06, Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi folks,Okay, here's is a quick update from the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

Hi Thomas, I used cygwin to compile fg-cvs, meanwhile I used MSVC as editor while compiling with cygwin. Then I found Olafs howto on the wiki and compiled with MSVC without deinstalling cygwin. For openal I used the al.zip archive from Olaf (after failing to use the files from the SDK from htt

[Flightgear-devel] FSWeekend

Hi folks, Okay, here's is a quick update from the FSWeekend.One FlightGear developer, who wishes to remain anonymous, Robin, and I are currently back in Amsterdam, enjoying (a) beer(s), after a very insightful first day at the FlightGear booth. We were very pleasantly surprised by the overall

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

Hi, > > i compiled it using MSVC8, i did follow your instructions, Olaf, taken > from your homepage. > > The problem is: FG crashes every time I try to start it. By running > the --log-level=debug option I found out that it quits at the point of > "initializing scenery subsystem" giving out

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

yeah thanks for the kind help,   i compiled it using MSVC8, i did follow your instructions, Olaf, taken from your homepage.   The problem is: FG crashes every time I try to start it. By running the --log-level=debug option I found out that it quits at the point of "initializing scenery subsystem"

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

Hi, > > i noticed that the version of flightgear i built from scratch using > cygwin takes significantly more time to start up (about 4-5 > minutes) than the one i installed using the exe-file from > flightgear.org (about 1-2 minutes). is there > any specific reason fo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenScenegraph MSVC8

Maik Justus schrieb: > Hi Olaf, > > I have used your project files / precompiled libs to compile fg with osg > from the scratch. It worked with only negligible problems. > A file simgear_config.h is missing; there is a simgear_config.h.vc5, > after renaiming to *.h it works. > 2 files had to be a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG - Bugs

Hi, > Has anyone else compiled fg-osg under windows? > @Olaf: do you have the performance gap between osg and plib as we have? > Do you have any idea, where the performance is lost? Can the non static > linking of osg can have such an effect? > I do see a significant slowdown. plib seems to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlieghtGear and VATSIM

Hello *, On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:36:34PM +0100, Stefan Seifert wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Holger Wirtz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > does anyone know if there are considerations to add VATSIm Support to > > FlightGear? > > There have already been some threads about

[Flightgear-devel] SW Mod new vehicle

In case someone likes to fly a Tie Fighter, drop me a line :-) Screenshot: http://www.laubfrosch.it/public/tmp/tie-005.jpg That just needs proper textures and maybe a custom flightmodel, anyone likes to help with that? Roberto ---