[Flightgear-devel] Missing airliner ...

2007-02-28 Thread
>> As soon as I get a workable traffic pattern I'll be sure to send it ... >> also going to try out my webspace and see if I can put up some >> screenshots of CYVR >> >> > Cool, looking forward to it. > > Cheers, > Durk > > OK , figured out enough to get a web page up with a few scree

Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI versus Traffic

2007-02-28 Thread Durk Talsma
syd&sandy wrote: > Hi , wow , quick reply ! :) > Ha, that's what you get, when you let a Dutchmen live in Canada for two months, with nothing but a suitcase, a laptop, and an iPod. :-) > OK traffic it is. The only problem I see (because Im just learning > Traffic) , is liveries . I try to use

Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI versus Traffic

2007-02-28 Thread
Durk Talsma wrote: > Hi Syd, > > syd&sandy wrote: > >> Hi all, >> While messing around with AI , unsuccessfully so far , Ive noticed >> similar scripts in AI and Traffic. >> >> > I'd say, go with traffic. :-). The aim of the scripts in Traffic is to > provide a basic (time-table) level

Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI versus Traffic

2007-02-28 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Syd, syd&sandy wrote: > Hi all, > While messing around with AI , unsuccessfully so far , Ive noticed > similar scripts in AI and Traffic. > I'd say, go with traffic. :-). The aim of the scripts in Traffic is to provide a basic (time-table) level of Flight information, from which point on

[Flightgear-devel] AI versus Traffic

2007-02-28 Thread
Hi all, While messing around with AI , unsuccessfully so far , Ive noticed similar scripts in AI and Traffic. Ive attempted to add an Alaska Airlines daily flight from CYVR to KSFO , just wondering which is more appropriate to use ... Im guessing the only difference is how they are activated in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] no more AAR.nas, please!

2007-02-28 Thread Markus Zojer
Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * alexis bory -- Tuesday 27 February 2007: > >> Ok, I promise to sort out the A-10's specifics function from >> aar.nas :) >> > > Excellent. Let's work together on one copy (Aircraft/Generic/aar.nas) > and make it the best possible. BTW: I think about moving the whol

Re: [Flightgear-devel] no more AAR.nas, please!

2007-02-28 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* alexis bory -- Tuesday 27 February 2007: > Ok, I promise to sort out the A-10's specifics function from > aar.nas :) Excellent. Let's work together on one copy (Aircraft/Generic/aar.nas) and make it the best possible. BTW: I think about moving the whole functionality into Nasa/fuel.nas. IIRC, An