Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:07:44 +0100, Ralf wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: AnMaster wrote: Good question, I guess combining them and manually fixing the problems would be too much work. I got no really good solution. But the current coastlines are very bad in many cases. What about

Re: [Flightgear-devel] model-paging patch - testers wanted

2008-03-22 Thread Tim Moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 till busch wrote: | hi all, | | as noted earlier in another thread, i am working on a model-paging patch. | I've checked this in, along with Till's further changes based on my feedback. Thank you very much; this is an important patch to a complex part

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Ralf Gerlich
Hi! Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..an idea out of the blue; if we model sea water, and the sea floor, we could _generate_ the coastline at runtime? It does move with high 'n low tide. The current scenery concept can only support fixed coastlines and we'd have the same problems with the rivers when

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Tim Moore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Gerlich wrote: | Hi! | | Arnt Karlsen wrote: | ..an idea out of the blue; if we model sea water, and the | sea floor, we could _generate_ the coastline at runtime? | It does move with high 'n low tide. | | The current scenery concept can only

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Jon Stockill
Tim Moore wrote: Is it practical to use the Landsat classification stuff you guys have demoed on your web pages to generate our own coastline data? It has already been done. The result is PGS (sorry for the horrid url):

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Ralf Gerlich
Hi! Tim Moore wrote: Is it practical to use the Landsat classification stuff you guys have demoed on your web pages to generate our own coastline data? Yes, we can extract the coastline data, but it might still require some further editing to eliminate misclassifications. The editing effort

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread S. Andreason
Hi Ralf, Are you still looking for 1x1 tiles with ocean showing as land? Stewart Ralf Gerlich wrote: It would be great if you could send me an exact position which is _inside_ the faulty tile. But I at least need general instructions on how to find the place. Maybe there's a pattern in these

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Ralf Gerlich
S. Andreason wrote: Are you still looking for 1x1 tiles with ocean showing as land? Well, I think I have the reason for the problem, but still I'm interested in bug reports. Cheers, Ralf - This SF.net email is sponsored

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Stewart Andreason
Well, I have some! ;) Put simply, there are land blockages across several bays blocking the harbors, and also blocking ferries leaving Seattle from reaching several islands which are no longer islands. Plus a few simple squares jutting out off the western coastline. 48.7490 -122.7490 thru

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Ralf Gerlich
Stewart Andreason wrote: Well, I have some! ;) [SNIP - Loads of sightings] OK, I originally intended to do partial rebuilds for the buggy tiles, but if there's so many of them (wonder why I didn't see any of them when checking the scenery myself) that warrants a full rebuild. Thanks! Cheers,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] model-paging patch - testers wanted

2008-03-22 Thread till busch
hi, wh! this has been a lot of work! biggest thanks go to vivian and csaba for testing my patch since the very beginning. you were really helpful in bug-hunting, complaining, rechecking and encouraging! thank you tim for answering all kinds of questions and for doing qa before check-in.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread S. Andreason
Ralf Gerlich wrote: [SNIP - Loads of sightings] OK, I originally intended to do partial rebuilds for the buggy tiles, but if there's so many of them (wonder why I didn't see any of them when checking the scenery myself) that warrants a full rebuild. Thanks! Hi Ralf, You're welcome.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Scenery 1.0.0 coastline is not processed

2008-03-22 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:27:29 +0100, Ralf wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! Arnt Karlsen wrote: ..an idea out of the blue; if we model sea water, and the sea floor, we could _generate_ the coastline at runtime? It does move with high 'n low tide. The current scenery concept

[Flightgear-devel] simgear error

2008-03-22 Thread SydSandy
Hi all, I did a system update this morning , a cvs update on FG and SG , and plib , and get these errors trying to compile simgear Making all in misc make[3]: Entering directory `/home/syd/FGFS/SG/source/simgear/misc' g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../simgear -I../..-g -O2 -D_REENTRANT

Re: [Flightgear-devel] simgear error

2008-03-22 Thread Robert Black
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 3:26 PM, SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I did a system update this morning , a cvs update on FG and SG , and plib , and get these errors trying to compile simgear Making all in misc make[3]: Entering directory `/home/syd/FGFS/SG/source/simgear/misc'

Re: [Flightgear-devel] simgear error

2008-03-22 Thread Csaba Halász
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 9:26 PM, SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: strutils.cxx:85: error: 'strlen' was not declared in this scope strutils.cxx:99: error: 'memcmp' was not declared in this scope Looks like a missing #include cstring or similar at the top of strutils.cxx. -- Csaba/Jester

Re: [Flightgear-devel] simgear error

2008-03-22 Thread SydSandy
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:15:33 +0100 Csaba Halász [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 9:26 PM, SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: strutils.cxx:85: error: 'strlen' was not declared in this scope strutils.cxx:99: error: 'memcmp' was not declared in this scope Looks like a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] simgear error

2008-03-22 Thread SydSandy
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:02:58 -0700 SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks guys ... It appears that the strutils.cxx hasn't been modified in a while , but there was an update to gcc, so I'm wiping out and reinstalling Arch from scratch (wanted to change my partitions anyway ), Cheers