Hi Alex,
I quickly tried it and found it don't work with my new fgrun prefetch
functionnality. In fgrun, I send only one position message, and your version
doesn't start the downloading process.
I must leave now. I will look at it later in the week.
-Fred
- "Alex Perry" a écrit :
> Foll
#define OPENSCENEGRAPH_MAJOR_VERSION2
#define OPENSCENEGRAPH_MINOR_VERSION6
#define OPENSCENEGRAPH_PATCH_VERSION0
sigh. I'll go fight with their website for enough bandwidth to upgrade ...
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Ron Jensen wrote:
> Alex,
> You can adjust this on the fly wit
Alex,
You can adjust this on the fly with /sim/rendering/camera-group/near-field.
What version of OSG are you using? I'm still using 2.7.8 with success,
but I believe 2.8.0 is the standard Tim's coding to.
Ron
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 21:19 -0800, Alex Perry wrote:
> Not to resurrect an old thread
Not to resurrect an old thread, but even znear=0.1 has the cockpit and
some visible runway gutted. I had to adjust the near-field value down
as well:
FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Main$ cvs diff -u
cvs diff: Diffing .
Index: CameraGroup.cxx
Following up on Fred's improvement to maintain a queue of pending tile
syncs, the attached version extends the deque to a priority ordered
list and also ensures we never repeat a sync that's already just been
performed. Consequently, we're now as responsive as possible to the
location change menu
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:12:17 +0100, Daan wrote in message
<49860222.1701d00a.4e31.b...@mx.google.com>:
> > > Could this cause the issue I am seeing under Windows?
> >
> > ..pass, all hearsay I've seen, suggests Microsoft hurt ATI's
> > business for some "high up" corporate policy reason, by t
Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> I've released FlightGear 1.9.1 for Mac OS X.
Oh, nice - one day I should buy a Mac which is capable of running FG
much more smoothly than my current Mac mini :-)
Thanks,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
-
Both Cm due to pitch rate and Cm due to alpha rate are legitimate. More
sophisticated models will have both.
-Original Message-
From: flying.toaster [mailto:flying.toas...@voila.fr]
Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2009 2:35 AM
To: development issues; flightgear-devel
Subject: Re: [Jsbsim-dev
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:41:40 +0100, Melchior wrote in message
<200902011641.41...@rk-nord.at>:
> * Curtis Olson -- Friday 30 January 2009:
> > The traditional unix scheme, and most linux packaging schemes,
> > assume only one version of the software at one time. [...]
..name caller idea from brlc
Hi guys, I am tring to compile fgcom on ubuntu 8.10. from svn.
must say that over 8.04 it compiles and run well. under 8.10 when I try
to compile it i get:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/francesco/fgfs/fgcom/iaxclient/lib'
cc -I. -Igsm/inc -Ilibspeex/include --std=c99 -Wall -Wmissing-noreturn
> > Could this cause the issue I am seeing under Windows?
>
> ..pass, all hearsay I've seen, suggests Microsoft hurt ATI's
> business for some "high up" corporate policy reason, by throwing
> odd error messages etc to scare people into buying Nvidia cards.
> But I've never heard of them changing a
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:57:20 +0100, Durk wrote in message
<200902011657.20734.d.tal...@xs4all.nl>:
> Hi Daan,
>
> On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:56:14 Daan wrote:
> > > > (After getting rid of my ATI card in favor of an nVidia one,
> > > > see my question in the forum)
> > >
> > > ..hang on to you
Hey Tat
On Sunday 01 February 2009 20:32:31 Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've released FlightGear 1.9.1 for Mac OS X.
>
Thanks a lot!
D.
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceFor
Hi there,
I've released FlightGear 1.9.1 for Mac OS X.
You can download it from:
http://macflightgear.sourceforge.net
For users:
This release is a bug-fix version of 1.9.0, therefore only binaries are
updated. The data package is the same as 1.9.0.
The GUI launcher and terrasync - on-the-fly do
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:56:14 +0100, Daan wrote in message
<4985b810.1c05d00a.0339.2...@mx.google.com>:
> > > (After getting rid of my ATI card in favor of an nVidia one, see
> > > my question in the forum)
> >
> > ..hang on to your ATI, try it with a Linux Live CD, e.g. Ubuntu.com,
> > and then d
* Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 01 February 2009:
> Any of the applications are only interested in FG_DATA. And please
> not again a fallback from FG_DATA to FG_ROOT/data, because that
> just repeats that old mistake.
No, wait! This would actually be ok: If FG_DATA is defined, use
data from there. Othe
There's now a "Model View". Like all new views it's activated by
default. Disable it in Menu->View->View Options if you don't
like it. It's really only useful for multiplayer: it allows
to switch through all multiplayer aircraft and to watch them
while they crash. :-)
If this view is active, then
Hi Daan,
On Sunday 01 February 2009 15:56:14 Daan wrote:
> > > (After getting rid of my ATI card in favor of an nVidia one, see my
> > > question in the forum)
> >
> > ..hang on to your ATI, try it with a Linux Live CD, e.g. Ubuntu.com,
> > and then do "sudo aptitude install flightgear" and try FG
> "Durk" == Durk Talsma writes:
[...]
Durk> For your information: This is now committed. I needed to
Durk> change the adf part to read the selected frequency from
Durk> (what I think) is the correct location of the property
Durk> tree. Changes in all selected frequencies and
* Curtis Olson -- Friday 30 January 2009:
> The traditional unix scheme, and most linux packaging schemes, assume only
> one version of the software at one time. [...]
> How about running a "live" version off a CD?
I don't see the problem. There's one executable, which you start like any
other exe
> > (After getting rid of my ATI card in favor of an nVidia one, see my
> > question in the forum)
>
> ..hang on to your ATI, try it with a Linux Live CD, e.g. Ubuntu.com,
> and then do "sudo aptitude install flightgear" and try FG the way
> God meant it to be done, and only then decide. ;o)
Ai,
Regarding the pull up issue, it seems fixed (partially) now.
My first assumption regarding atmosphere was definitely wrong (even though the
JSBSsim atmosphere feels better now and the FG atmosphere is still wrong above
60kft).
I have looked into the Cmalpha values and it was only fixed to a si
22 matches
Mail list logo
