On Saturday 07 February 2009 01:48:55 FGD ML wrote:
2009/2/6 Roy Vegard Ovesen roy.v.ove...@haugnett.no
Using Blender I added a texture to one of the sides of the borgbox, and
finally exported to *.lwo format. The texture did not appear in
osgviewer. Looking at the resulting *.lwo file in a
On Saturday 07 February 2009 10:22:09 Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
As I said the .lwo file that Blender generated did _not_ contain any
reference to the texture image, so I don't think that putting the image in
the same path as the .lwo file will work. This could of course be because
I'm not
2009/2/7 Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:06:59 +, FGD wrote in message
9dfda0650902061506u22068722ld9a43d1ebb574...@mail.gmail.com:
2009/2/6 Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:51:45 +, FGD wrote in message
2009/2/7 Roy Vegard Ovesen roy.v.ove...@haugnett.no
On Saturday 07 February 2009 10:22:09 Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
As I said the .lwo file that Blender generated did _not_ contain any
reference to the texture image, so I don't think that putting the image
in
the same path as the .lwo
On Saturday 07 February 2009 12:38:23 FGD ML wrote:
2009/2/7 Roy Vegard Ovesen roy.v.ove...@haugnett.no
Do you mean grab a copy of LightWave?
Yeah, why not? I heard that these days it just runs in discovery mode
(?) if you don't have a dongle. I've never been there so don't know how
that
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Rodrigo Severo
rodr...@fabricadeideias.comwrote:
Unfortunately I'm having a really bad time with nasal scripts.
I'm having all kinds of errors on the console. Some of them:
Nasal runtime error: No such member: real_time_base
at
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:39:13 +, FGD wrote in message
9dfda0650902070239p450979e0n2ef48491d3552...@mail.gmail.com:
2009/2/7 Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:06:59 +, FGD wrote in message
9dfda0650902061506u22068722ld9a43d1ebb574...@mail.gmail.com:
2009/2/6 Arnt
* Arnt Karlsen -- Saturday 07 February 2009:
Then why are you here, asking us for freebee help?
^^
I'm sure he didn't specifically ask you anything. Posting to
flightgear-devel usually means you want to address FlightGear
developers (in the widest sense) -- and I'm
Hi Ian,
On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:39:13 FGD ML wrote:
2009/2/7 Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net
..ah, that's where I try to help out. ;o)
I'm sorry , I have a policy of not accepting cold callers.
I hope you find comfort in the fact that 99% of our fgfs-devel subscribers is
simply
On samedi 07 février 2009, Durk Talsma wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:39:13 FGD ML wrote:
2009/2/7 Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net
..ah, that's where I try to help out. ;o)
I'm sorry , I have a policy of not accepting cold callers.
I hope you find comfort in the fact that
2009/2/7 Durk Talsma d.tal...@xs4all.nl
Hi Ian,
On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:39:13 FGD ML wrote:
2009/2/7 Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net
..ah, that's where I try to help out. ;o)
I'm sorry , I have a policy of not accepting cold callers.
I hope you find comfort in the fact that
On samedi 07 février 2009, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:50:57 FGD ML wrote:
2009/2/7 Roy Vegard Ovesen roy.v.ove...@haugnett.no
On Saturday 07 February 2009 10:22:09 Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
As I said the .lwo file that Blender generated did _not_ contain
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 14:29 +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Arnt Karlsen -- Saturday 07 February 2009:
Then why are you here, asking us for freebee help?
^^
I'm sure he didn't specifically ask you anything. Posting to
flightgear-devel usually means you want to
2009/2/7 Melchior FRANZ mfr...@aon.at
Not that this has much to do with this thread, or Ian's
FlightGear problems.
Oh I would not worry about it, this thread has been hijacked, dragged off
topic and otherwise generally killed already.
Obviously starting another thread won't be likely to fair
Ian
Jeez, what's the problem? If you really want to share models what's stopping
you? Not some half-hard ill-informed comments on this list I hope. If your
models aren't GPL that just means _we_ can't bundle them with FG. That's not
a problem - there are several places around that offer nice
FGD ML wrote:
2009/2/7 Melchior FRANZ mfr...@aon.at mailto:mfr...@aon.at
Not that this has much to do with this thread, or Ian's
FlightGear problems.
Oh I would not worry about it, this thread has been hijacked, dragged
off topic and otherwise generally killed already.
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:29:31 +0100, Melchior wrote in message
200902071429.32...@rk-nord.at:
* Arnt Karlsen -- Saturday 07 February 2009:
Then why are you here, asking us for freebee help?
^^
I'm sure he didn't specifically ask you anything. Posting to
Thank you; I was hoping to revisit that file this evening. I like the
way you did the cache timing. Did you intentionally retain the cache
flush on location update, or should I port that part of my patch onto
your version? When we run out of real time requests, I think it is a
good idea to
but anyway, I made a new
Windows build with the last OSG 2.8 branch with a working LWO plugin :
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/fgrun+fgfs-osg-win32-cvs-20090207.zip
This Wiki page explains how to use it :
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Keeping_FlightGear_(win32
On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:50:57 FGD ML wrote
Yes, full pathname to the .png image file. There is actually a bug in the
exporter code that cuts one character from the path string (/home/...
becomes /hme/...). I also tried to remove the pull path leaving only the
filename, and copied the
On Saturday 07 February 2009 20:25:43 alex wrote:
On Saturday 07 February 2009 11:50:57 FGD ML wrote
Yes, full pathname to the .png image file. There is actually a bug in the
exporter code that cuts one character from the path string (/home/...
becomes /hme/...). I also tried to remove the
On vendredi 06 février 2009, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Where is the proper gear model patch, Martin? mail.flightgear.org
is down so the archives prior to 2005 are unreachable. I'm interested
in taking a look.
I'm also wondering what is stopping you from grabbing a copy of
JSBSim,
-osg-win32-cvs-20090207.zip
This Wiki page explains how to use it :
http://wiki.flightgear.org/index.php/Keeping_FlightGear_(win32)_up_to_date_without_compiling
Regards,
-Fred
..excellent work, Fred, my only question is, _should_ FG have
this LWO plugin? The only problems remaining are legal
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:57:55 +, FGD wrote in message
9dfda0650902070857i71aca8cen90b9f19b99d4c...@mail.gmail.com:
2009/2/7 Melchior FRANZ mfr...@aon.at
Not that this has much to do with this thread, or Ian's
FlightGear problems.
Oh I would not worry about it, this thread has been
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net wrote:
..excellent work, Fred, my only question is, _should_ FG have
this LWO plugin? The only problems remaining are legal, the
licensing and politics.
LWO plugin is in OSG. If you have any legal or licensing problems
about it, talk
2009/2/7 Arnt Karlsen a...@c2i.net
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 16:57:55 +, FGD wrote in message
9dfda0650902070857i71aca8cen90b9f19b99d4c...@mail.gmail.com:
2009/2/7 Melchior FRANZ mfr...@aon.at
Not that this has much to do with this thread, or Ian's
FlightGear problems.
Oh I would
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 22:47 +, FGD ML wrote:
Well as long as we are wanting to be talking about public record and
having it done correctly:
[removed private e-mail]
As you can see, this gives lie to the comments made by some about
being reluctant to supply a model as requested and it
27 matches
Mail list logo
