[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] to enhance translate animation

2009-02-15 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Hi, the rotate animation has two ways to define a axis 1. by using center/x-m and axis/[xyz] 2. by using axis/[xyz]1-m and axis/[xyz]2-m The translate animation only supports method 1. and here comes a patch that enables method 2 for this animations, too. Works fine for me and makes life a litt

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml , 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread gerard robin
On dimanche 15 février 2009, Nicolas Quijano wrote: > Gerard, you're not getting it : if I want wildfire to spread when I crash a > Crusader, you shouldn't have a say in it, period. > Let me try to explain it from the user's perspective : a user of both the > dev's creation, the simulation, and in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml , 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread Nicolas Quijano
Gerard, you're not getting it : if I want wildfire to spread when I crash a Crusader, you shouldn't have a say in it, period. Let me try to explain it from the user's perspective : a user of both the dev's creation, the simulation, and in this case, your a/c. I'm the one piloting the Crusader, and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml , 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread Alexis Bory - xiii
gerard robin wrote: > I was STUPID since, i thought that the modelers were free to create > the Aircraft in order to answer to these old criteria ( best FDM, eye > candy). I noticed now that we are dependent of some constraints, we > must accept anything coming from the mind of DEVELOPPER who

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preferred development os

2009-02-15 Thread Geoff McLane
Hi Alisdair, >> Doesn't work ... --with-simgear=RELATIVE_PATH ... >> Is this normal? Do not (yet) know or understand enough about 'automake' to know if it is 'normal' to fail with a relative path... But when you think about it '../simgear-cs' would NOT be correct when compiling in say the 'src'

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml , 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread gerard robin
On dimanche 15 février 2009, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:36:30 + (GMT), Stuart wrote in message > > > ..then you have exotic compromises like crashing on ice, dead stick > landings in methane clouds downwind of broken pipelines, ripe full > hydrazine tanks as you ditch in free

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml , 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Sébastien MARQUE -- Sunday 15 February 2009: > I'm quite "surprised" not to see someone purpose an other solution which > is only to override wildfire.ignite() function in a single aircraft, as > we are used to do for brakes, or starting engines. That's because this is *still* wrong. This is a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml, 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread Sébastien MARQUE
Hi all, I understand the both point of view about wildfire and "gaming" issues. but I think that changing wildfire-on-crash property is not a good solution because it is registered, but it is also a problem if an aircraft designer wants to create his own crash animation. I'm quite "surprised"

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml , 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread gerard robin
On dimanche 15 février 2009, Detlef Faber wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 15.02.2009, 09:45 +0100 schrieb Detlef Faber: > > Am Samstag, den 14.02.2009, 23:15 +0100 schrieb gerard robin: > > > On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > > > * Gerard Robin -- Saturday 14 February 2009: > > > > > Lo

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml , 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:36:30 + (GMT), Stuart wrote in message <628624.58015...@web26003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>: > > gerard robin wrote: > > On dimanche 15 février 2009, Ron Jensen wrote: > > > Respectfully I must disagree with you here. This is a system > > > feature and should not be adjuste

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Preferred development os

2009-02-15 Thread Alasdair Campbell
On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 18:35 +0100, Geoff McLane wrote: > Hi Alasdair, > > I just noted the comment in your terra_compile.sh script - > # ??why does configure not pick up the correct includes if I specify > --with-simgear=$BUILDDIR/simgear-cs > > As advised in my post yesterday (Feb 12), the confi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml, 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread Detlef Faber
Am Sonntag, den 15.02.2009, 09:45 +0100 schrieb Detlef Faber: > Am Samstag, den 14.02.2009, 23:15 +0100 schrieb gerard robin: > > On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > > * Gerard Robin -- Saturday 14 February 2009: > > > > Log Message: > > > > withdraw the "game coat" > > > > > > > >

[Flightgear-devel] Bug in SGBucket::set_bucket

2009-02-15 Thread Brian Schack
SGBucket::set_bucket(double dlon, double dlat) has some bugs, especially evident at high latitudes. For example, try this test, which consists of 3 closely-spaced points: SGBucket b1(-179.5, 87.5); printf("b1: lon = %d, lat = %d\n", b1.get_chunk_lon(), b1.get_chunk_lat()); SGBucket b2

Re: [Flightgear-devel] CVS: data/Aircraft/F-8E-Crusader Crusader-SetBase.xml, 1.23, 1.24

2009-02-15 Thread Detlef Faber
Am Samstag, den 14.02.2009, 23:15 +0100 schrieb gerard robin: > On samedi 14 février 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > * Gerard Robin -- Saturday 14 February 2009: > > > Log Message: > > > withdraw the "game coat" > > > > > > + > > > + > > > + false > > > +