On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
Btw Jon:
Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
Here, too.
This is a result of my experimenting with the multiple FDM feature again -
which is not ready, but which
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
Btw Jon:
Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
Here, too.
This is a result of my experimenting with the multiple FDM
Curtis Olson wrote:
2009/6/23 Mathias Fröhlich
Well, from my point of view. I would prefer to have these.
The reason is to have something self contained here.
Sure we already rely on osg at many places. But if I build an
aplication on
simgear, I hope to have simgear
Hi,
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 09:53:13 James Turner wrote:
An observation: this change has stopped SGAtomic being (by default) a
proxy for osg/OpenThreads Atomic. There's a downside to this -
OpenThreads Atomic has a specialisation (not of the template kind, but
the #ifdef kind) for OS-X
Hi Tim,
On Thursday 25 June 2009 10:22:54 Tim Moore wrote:
OK, but in case you hadn't noticed, libsgmath depends on OSG.
Yes I have noticed that change in the quaternion/matrix.
I believe that we should get rid of that.
And yes, the vector storage is from osg. But it is a few line change to get
It's working again. Thanks! :D
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Victhor wrote:
Btw Jon:
Reset in FlightGear yields multiple /fdm/jsbsim property subtrees.
Here, too.
This is a result of my
Hello guys,
I'm a new member of the devel-list and new to FightGear too. I came from
X-Plane and I have done some aircraft for this simulator (
http://xhydros.free.fr/) and I'm the webmaster of a french scenery site (
http://xpfr-scenery.fr/)
In order to understand FlightGear and especially FDM,
Hi,
nice to see a X-Planer here! Welcome to FGFS!
Very interesting aircrafts and nice scenerys!
YASim is based on the same principles like the X-Plane-fdm, but maybe not so
good in features.
I'm not an expert in YASim, that's Detlef Faber and I hope he reads here.
Can I use the mstab command to
Hello Olivier,
Olivier Faivre schrieb am 25.06.2009 20:52:
Hello guys,
...
Actually, the wing is done with only one piece, 7° dihedral, no twist.
Can I use the mstab command to specify the outer wing and the
regular wing command for the inner one ?
yes
In the readme file, I read this for
Hi
Heiko Schulz schrieb am 25.06.2009 22:06:
Hi,
...
Can I use the mstab command to specify the outer wing and the
regular wing command for the inner one ?
In the readme file, I read this for mstab : these surfaces are not
involved with the solver computation these surfaces are not
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
This is a result of my experimenting with the multiple FDM feature again -
which is not ready, but which should be innocuous. Apparently it's not. Did
you use the JSBSim.cxx from JSBSim CVS? I think I can fix this fairly
easily.
Jon,
Ron Jensen
Hi All,
Curt recently posted to the Forum
(http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6t=5201) regarding creating
a FlightGear Newsletter. This is something that I had thought about for some
time, and I suspect many other people have too over the years.
As I had some unexpected spare
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Hi Tim,
On Thursday 25 June 2009 10:22:54 Tim Moore wrote:
OK, but in case you hadn't noticed, libsgmath depends on OSG.
Yes I have noticed that change in the quaternion/matrix.
If you mean the methods in SGGeod that return osg::Matrix, I wrote them
that way because
Jon,
Ron Jensen suggested this idea as a solution for the multiple FDM
subtrees. It seems to work fine in FlightGear. Would it also work for
your multiple FDM work in JSBSim/CVS?
Anders (and Ron),
I'll test this out as soon as I can. It may be a few days.
Jon
Index:
14 matches
Mail list logo
