Hi Martin
It resolves to the loopback address.
But I think I read on the wiki that starting with FG 1.0, the address which
was used to identify the interface is not required anymore.
So, following that info, I've tested the following change and it seems to
work on both Ubuntu and Windows.
Could
Hi Tom,
Tom P wrote:
It resolves to the loopback address.
If the 'offiicial' hostname resolves to the loopback interface, then
the /etc/hosts file is probably the culprit. Try fixing it by assigning
the hostname to the IP address of the 'external' interface.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix
Hi Martin
I'd prefer to have a solution that works for a stock Ubuntu installation.
This configuration I have here is pretty standard, DHCP over WLAN.
If you could consider this patch, which solves the problem at its root (as
far as I can tell), I'd rather go this way, which doesn't require
On 22/09/09 11:18, Thomas Betka wrote:
With all the talk about FG audio here recently, it reminded me that I
haven't yet gotten around to something I've wanted to do for some
time--record some new audio files.
On this subject, some time ago I played with ripping sound from youtube
videos
Hi Tom,
Tom P wrote:
I'd prefer to have a solution that works for a stock Ubuntu installation.
If the 'official' hostname (the one to which the FQDN is assigned)
points to the loopback interface, then the setup is wrong. If this is
really the one and only default with your favourite
While reworking the sound system I started to wonder about the ATC
chatter and such (like beacons and morse code).
Should these be tied to the main aircraft (and hence fade away when the
aircraft gets further away) or should these be audible no matter what?
Erik
On 22/09/09 20:22, Erik Hofman wrote:
While reworking the sound system I started to wonder about the ATC
chatter and such (like beacons and morse code).
Should these be tied to the main aircraft (and hence fade away when the
aircraft gets further away) or should these be audible no matter
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
Therefore I doubt if it's really clever to bend FGRun for this very
case. Nevertheless, my intention was to guide you to a proper fix, if
you don't like it, your choice. At least it would be helpful to try it
out.
Ubuntu issues aside I think it is
On 22 Sep 2009, at 09:28, James Sleeman wrote:
While reworking the sound system I started to wonder about the ATC
chatter and such (like beacons and morse code).
Should these be tied to the main aircraft (and hence fade away when
the
aircraft gets further away) or should these be audible
James Turner wrote:
I suspect this should be a pref - either the local cockpit sounds are
associated with the aircraft model (realistic operation) or they are
associated with the view position (unrealistic but useful if you like
switching to an outside view but don't want to miss a bit
Anders Gidenstam wrote:
AFAIK fgrun has reportedly defaulted to a nonresolvable name on
Windows too on several occasions. Let's remove this source of unnecessary
confusion from fgrun.
Cheers,
Anders
** Nods in agreement with Anders **
pete
On 22 Sep 2009, at 10:10, Erik Hofman wrote:
Why was I already suspecting it would end up like this? :)
Well, putting on my Apple user-interface hat, adding a pref is always
a thing to be cautious about - much better to make the software smart
(since the user is dumb!) and do the 'right
Hi all,
I decided to contribute my joystick definion to this project because this stick
is not yet supported by FG. Feel free to integrate it into your repository.
Notes, Todo and Addendum:
- Pressing a button will bring up the gui.popupTip for the representing function
- Addionally Buttons 2
Hello all...
With all the talk about FG audio here recently, it reminded me that I haven't
yet gotten around to something I've wanted to do for some time--record some new
audio files. I have access to a Piper Aztec, a light twin-engined aircraft.
It's engines are six-cylinder Lycoming
James Turner wrote:
I suspect this should be a pref - either the local cockpit sounds are
associated with the aircraft model (realistic operation) or they are
associated with the view position (unrealistic but useful if you like
switching to an outside view but don't want to miss a bit
I've been alerted to this web site:
http://www.flightprosim.com/
We all know by now that under certain conditions one can sell open source
software packages such as FlightGear. However, it seems to me that this web
site is problematic in several ways,
- copyrighted screen captures may be used
-
This looks much more problematic:
http://www.flightprosim.com/disclaimer/
JB
-Original Message-
From: Jon S. Berndt [mailto:jonsber...@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 7:03 AM
To: 'FlightGear developers discussions'
Subject: Another FlightGear Package for Sale:
Good idea's John, I'll try to think about it when going further. It
might need adjustment after the first commit but I'll try to make it easy.
Erik
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF,
The do state This is a commercial adaption of the world renown flight
Gear project. Further information available in our Developers Area in
the shopping area:
http://www.flightprosim.com/#order
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
This looks much more problematic:
http://www.flightprosim.com/disclaimer/
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 14:04:16 Jon S. Berndt wrote:
This looks much more problematic:
http://www.flightprosim.com/disclaimer/
copyrighted under United States and other World Wide Patents
A little confusion of totally different laws...
But interestingly from the front page:
There is no
Hi
Just to dig up the old discussion. That was about this site:
http://flight-aviator.com/
Which is copyrighted by http://www.FlightProSim.com and uses the same layout
and
text. We sucessfully contacted the webmaster of FPS last time (the images were
removed), so I think we should do that
Have you seen that:
--Flight-Aviator.com acknowledges that there may be an undisclosed amount of
the pictures and / or other content found on this site that are not property of
Flight-Aviator.com. If you feel you own one of these pictures and / or
content, feel free to contact us at through
Same outfit as was discussed at end of last year. November 2008.
Subject Another person selling FlightGear under dubious pretenses
Search out that mailing list discussion thread.
On 23/09/09 00:04, Jon S. Berndt wrote:
This looks much more problematic:
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 14:21:25 Stefan Seifert wrote:
Since they are advertising the multi player feature: how about periodically
broadcasting a message via MP servers that users are using free software
called FlightGear available at flightgear.org?
This would make sense if there were
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 20:28 +1200, James Sleeman wrote:
On 22/09/09 20:22, Erik Hofman wrote:
While reworking the sound system I started to wonder about the ATC
chatter and such (like beacons and morse code).
Should these be tied to the main aircraft (and hence fade away when the
Hi Martin
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
Hi Tom,
Therefore I doubt if it's really clever to bend FGRun for this very
case. Nevertheless, my intention was to guide you to a proper fix, if
you don't like it, your choice. At least it would be
On 09/22/09 08:03, Ron Jensen wrote:
I would like to hear all the cockpit sounds in exterior views because I
am still sitting in the cockpit. My rudder pedals are under my feet,
my throttle quadrant is at my knee, and the stick is in my hand. I am
still flying the aircraft so it is
Hi Stefan,
that's a fantastic offer!
The jury is still out on the choice of DVCS, but I hope we finalize it soon
and we can put your server (and plenty of bandwidth!) to good use.
Thanks
Tom
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:23 AM, Stefan Seifert n...@detonation.org wrote:
On Saturday 19 September
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:24 AM, John Denker wrote:
On 09/22/09 08:03, Ron Jensen wrote:
I would like to hear all the cockpit sounds in exterior views because I
am still sitting in the cockpit. My rudder pedals are under my feet,
my throttle quadrant is at my knee, and the stick is in
Tom P wrote:
The jury is still out on the choice of DVCS, but I hope we finalize it soon
and we can put your server (and plenty of bandwidth!) to good use.
I'm sure we'll manage to arrange a couple of read-only GIT servers for
use by Joe Average. A round-robin DNS will do the rest. In
Hi,
I would like to hear all the cockpit sounds in
exterior views because I
am still sitting in the cockpit. My
rudder pedals are under my feet,
my throttle quadrant is at my knee, and the stick is
in my hand. I am
still flying the aircraft so it is important to hear
the
Erik Hofman wrote:
It's way more extreme than that, the dewpoint once in a while seems to
reset to -2.8308 from it's current value causing the humidity to jump
way beyond 100% (I've seen 1200%). I could limit the humidity to 100%
but that only hides the problem.
I did not find why the
Here it is!!
At procedure void FGEnvironment::set_elevation_ft (double e)
change :
_recalc_alt_dewpoint();
_recalc_alt_pt();
to :
_recalc_alt_pt();
_recalc_alt_dewpoint();
It corrects all.
With respect,
Alex
So problem is in the value of temperature_degc.
It seems to be a couple of errors connected with environment.
1) File: fg_commands.cxx, routine: static bool
do_set_dewpoint_sea_level_degc (const SGPropertyNode * arg)
variable dewpoint_sea_level_degc is defined as
double
Here it is!!
At procedure void FGEnvironment::set_elevation_ft (double e)
change :
_recalc_alt_dewpoint();
_recalc_alt_pt();
to :
_recalc_alt_pt();
_recalc_alt_dewpoint();
It corrects all.
With respect,
Alex
Right, Congrats!
Commited right away ;-)
With more respect,
I'd prefer not to hear cockpit sounds from exterior views myself , so it
would be nice if there was a way to enable/disable them .
Would be nice too, if engine volumes would really go to 0 from exterior
views .
Cheers
--
Maybe a bit of a tangent question about the sound but..
The scenario in mind for xmas is a couple of new proper PC's
(multiscreen) set up with FG, so two kids in different parts of the
house are concerting. In the meantime there can be some ATC presence
from some laptop in the garden shed as
I still see a problem with altimeters and pressures.
Sitting at KHIF (4789 ft) with a metar that reads:
KHIF 230355Z 09006KT 10SM CLR 14/04 A3032 RMK AO2A DZE0300 SLP227 P
T01380036 $
I set my altimeter to 30.32. The altimeter reads 4666 ft, or about 120
feet too low.
38 matches
Mail list logo
