Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG + vrml plugin

2011-05-22 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi Curt, On Sunday, May 22, 2011 18:33:22 Curtis Olson wrote: > Sounds strangely familiar! :-) Is there a particular minimum dev version I > could find this patch in? I've been hanging around with v2.9.7 of OSG here > because of compatibility problems of the newer versions. It looks like > the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata merge request 91:Animated Jetways

2011-05-22 Thread Martin Spott
Ryan M wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 16:59 +, Martin Spott wrote: >> [...] Look, we're already distributing >> airport-specific ground networks, why not accompagny the jetway >> positions alongside the other airport-specific stuff instead of >> creating yet another, new directory. > > Ah, I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata merge request 91:Animated Jetways

2011-05-22 Thread Ryan M
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 16:59 +, Martin Spott wrote: > Your submission is touching various places, therefore please expect > various people (maintainers) to have their specific opinion on this. > For example I could envision that those who are keeping an eye on the > AI aicraft collection might a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG + vrml plugin

2011-05-22 Thread Curtis Olson
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Curtis Olson wrote: > Sounds strangely familiar! :-) Is there a particular minimum dev version I > could find this patch in? I've been hanging around with v2.9.7 of OSG here > because of compatibility problems of the newer versions. It looks like > there is som

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata merge request 91:Animated Jetways

2011-05-22 Thread Martin Spott
Hi Ryan, please excuse the rather brief comment. I had been short in time and was about to leave - actually I ended up being too late for the final rehearsal before a symphony concert this morning :-(( Your submission is touching various places, therefore please expect various people (mainta

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG + vrml plugin

2011-05-22 Thread Curtis Olson
2011/5/22 Mathias Fröhlich > No, the line segments are not supported. At least not in the current > release > version. My line segment support is checked in with revision 11290. So you > may > backport that pach to the current release version. > > BTW, I needed the line segments in vrml for export

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG + vrml plugin

2011-05-22 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi Curt, On Sunday, May 22, 2011 17:14:54 Curtis Olson wrote: > Thanks for the reply. It appears that removing the CMakeCache.txt file did > the trick. Now it finds the openvrml libs and builds the plugin. It turns > out I still can't view the wrl file though ... it's a whole bunch of line > s

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fog vs black sky (issue #319)

2011-05-22 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi Thosten, On Saturday, May 21, 2011 13:45:50 ThorstenB wrote: > Am Freitag, den 20.05.2011, 19:06 +0200 schrieb ThorstenB: > > On 19.05.2011 20:38, Lauri Peltonen wrote: > > > So the solution is either change the clear color to what it was, or > > > make it ramp linearly to black or something w

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG + vrml plugin

2011-05-22 Thread Curtis Olson
Hi Mathias, Thanks for the reply. It appears that removing the CMakeCache.txt file did the trick. Now it finds the openvrml libs and builds the plugin. It turns out I still can't view the wrl file though ... it's a whole bunch of line segments which maybe isn't supported by the vrml plugin? I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OSG + vrml plugin

2011-05-22 Thread Mathias Fröhlich
Hi Curt, On Saturday, May 21, 2011 20:19:01 Curtis Olson wrote: > Has anyone built the vrml plugin for OSG under linux (fedora). The > README.txt says I need boost and openvrml installed. I've installed > openvrml and libopenvrml{,-devel}, and rerun ./configure but the vrml > plugin still isn't

[Flightgear-devel] fgdata merge request 91:Animated Jetways

2011-05-22 Thread Ryan M
I apologize for not raising this discussion *before* I filed that request, as I should have. From the comments on http://gitorious.org/merge_requests/91: > In the past we've been struggling for more than one and a half release > cycles in order to separate Scenery-specific stuff from the Base > Pa

Re: [Flightgear-devel] heads up: FlightGear release plan

2011-05-22 Thread ThorstenB
Hi, since there were no major objections to the release plan, we're proceeding as proposed. Current status: * We've "officially grounded" the releases/2.2.0 git branches yesterday. The flightgear/simgear "releases/2.2.0" branches were merged back to "master" (not "next"! "master" always contains