Am 18.02.2012 01:04, schrieb Heiko Schulz:
> I have created now a merge Request including the ratings of aircraft I have
> been involved, I hope it is not too late.
It is :-(
Torsten
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..hopefully, the guys will have enough self discipline to stay away from
> something this kinky until they have the old hag (FG-2.6) out the door,
> should be happening around the 17'th, I'm having my gear coming into my
> new workshop home on the 16'th a
BTW I also found this Shader Editor in a browser.
http://www.kickjs.org/example/shader_editor/shader_editor.html [15]
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:15:56 +1100, Scott Hamilton wrote:
> On Sat,
18 Feb 2012 14:29:02 +1100, Scott Hamilton wrote:
>
> Sorry for my
previous terse answer, but I was
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:29:02 +1100, Scott Hamilton wrote:
Sorry
for my previous terse answer, but I was out and about, so using my phone
while walking..
The link I gave below (
www.doesmybrowsersupportwebgl.com ) is a very quick way to determine if
your current browser supports WebGL, most
www.doesmybrowsersupportwebgl.com
Gary Neely wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>>
>>> On a slightly related note, stumbled accross this: "a HTML5 JavaScript
>>> library to render 3D models
>>> in .ac format using WebGL." Might be a nice addition to our download
>>>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
>> On a slightly related note, stumbled accross this: "a HTML5 JavaScript
>> library to render 3D models
>> in .ac format using WebGL." Might be a nice addition to our download
>> page...
>
>> Demo: http://inmensia.com/files/hangar/flight-gall
Hello,
My last two cents about
[snip]
> ...Above all, the problems shouldn't be mixed together. If there is a
> problem, that should be addressed, but not by creating a new problem. If > a
> person has reacted improperly in some context, it doesn't give grounds to
> calling his work worthless in
> On a slightly related note, stumbled accross this: "a HTML5 JavaScript
> library to render 3D models
> in .ac format using WebGL." Might be a nice addition to our download
> page...
> Demo: http://inmensia.com/files/hangar/flight-gallery/index.html
> Source: http://code.google.com/p/hangar/
H
Hello Stuart,
> I've managed to get this done, and passed the results to Curt, so the
> 2.6.0 Aircraft Download page will show ratings for aircraft, or a "?" if
> the aircraft has not been rated.
Many, many Thanks for the work!
I have created now a merge Request including the ratings of aircraf
> Stuart wrote:
>
> the 2.6.0 Aircraft Download page will show ratings for aircraft
Great!
On a slightly related note, stumbled accross this: "a HTML5 JavaScript library
to render 3D models
in .ac format using WebGL." Might be a nice addition to our download page...
Demo: http://inmensia.com/
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I'm currently writing a script to generate the aircraft download page
> that will include ratings, so users will be able to see the ratings of
> aircraft _before_ they download them.
>
> Hopefully I'll get it finished this evening in time fo
> Heiko write:
>
> It can be also a Minus as it seems for me as our system has been abused here,
> and yes, the fact that all aircraft are downloadable without any sign of
> their state
> may FGFS let look bad!
You might like to start adding status ratings to your own aircraft then ;)
It's all
Hi Yves,
I am open to this sort of thing, but I wonder if our development list might
be sufficient. It's relatively low traffic these days -- and we do have a
section for this on the forum. We have a flightgear-flightmodel list that
is almost never used. The thing about creating a new mailing l
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Erik Hofman wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 12:00 +0200, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
>
>> Which the rating scheme makes a lot easier now.
>
> This makes me think that it may be a nice idea to have the top 10 of
> best rated aircraft available somewhere as an add-o
> The fact that we have now 3 different threads about the same topics:
> DC3, licence violation and cooperation in an OpenSource project, makes
> it difficult to see where the real problems are.
There's a number of separate issues here.
* license violation of some commits
-> this is a real proble
On 02/17/2012 12:10 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> I agree that OpenSource allows to add unfinished aircraft and that it can be
> a Plus for OpenSource.
> But that doesn't mean that you automatically have to do this!
>
> It can be also a Minus as it seems for me as our system has been abused here,
>
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> I agree that OpenSource allows to add unfinished aircraft and that it
> can be a Plus for OpenSource.
> But that doesn't mean that you automatically have to do this!
No, there's no written law that you have to do it. But's it's the
well-known recpe behind the success of Ope
On 17 Feb 2012, at 10:23, Martin Spott wrote:
> Chris Forbes wrote:
>> ---
>> src/Traffic/TrafficMgr.cxx |4 +---
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Would you consider cloning the repository and filing merge-requests on
> Gitorious ? That's much easier to track - and it
> All people need to know that 60% (or more... it's approximate) of
> aircraft available for flightgear are created by helijah.
> More than 80% of them are totaly crappy ! They aren't a good point for
> FlightGear project !
vs.
> If you want to blame someone, you have to blame the people who mad
Martin,
Is it acceptable to send merge requests with a git URL for a server
elsewhere, or must it be on gitorious?
-- Chris
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Chris Forbes wrote:
>> ---
>> src/Traffic/TrafficMgr.cxx | 4 +---
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions
Reduces the perf impact of FGAISchedule::findAvailableFlight()
---
src/Traffic/SchedFlight.cxx |5 -
src/Traffic/SchedFlight.hxx |5 -
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/Traffic/SchedFlight.cxx b/src/Traffic/SchedFlight.cxx
index 5339a29..1b8586f 100
> I never refused improvements (Long Ez, Velocity XL, Carreidas 160, B25,
> A26 Invader, I16, UH 1, etc. ) So stop slandering without knowing.
Which isn't true.
You refused my improvement to the Velocity XL due to personal reasons,
and you refused the contribution by another person due to "m
Hi Chris,
Chris Forbes wrote:
> ---
> src/Traffic/TrafficMgr.cxx |4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Would you consider cloning the repository and filing merge-requests on
Gitorious ? That's much easier to track - and it preserves your name
as the author of the fix.
C
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 12:00 +0200, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
> Which the rating scheme makes a lot easier now.
This makes me think that it may be a nice idea to have the top 10 of
best rated aircraft available somewhere as an add-on to the base
package. Or something like that.
Erik
---
> All people need to know that 60% (or more... it's approximate) of
> aircraft available for flightgear are created by helijah.
> More than 80% of them are totaly crappy ! They aren't a good point for
> FlightGear project !
I think you're mistaking Flightgear for a commercial project here.
Sure,
---
src/Traffic/TrafficMgr.cxx |4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/Traffic/TrafficMgr.cxx b/src/Traffic/TrafficMgr.cxx
index 44e8567..d4f20b3 100644
--- a/src/Traffic/TrafficMgr.cxx
+++ b/src/Traffic/TrafficMgr.cxx
@@ -674,9 +674,7 @@ void FGTrafficManag
26 matches
Mail list logo
