On Sunday 05 October 2008 10:13:54 Durk Talsma wrote:
> While I'm at it. :-)
>
> With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
> highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
> Completeness, variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo
>
Hi Gerard,
On Sunday 16 November 2008 15:22:50 gerard robin wrote:
> could you include the Caudron C684
>
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/images/f/fa/C684-1.png
>
> Great Aircraft, Model, FDM, Cockpit ...
> It should be able to pretend.
>
> Cheers
Thanks for pointing out this little gem. I took
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Durk Talsma wrote:
> While I'm at it. :-)
>
> With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
> highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
> Completeness, variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo
> fligh
The SU-37 should be regarded as experimental and I did it primarily
to see if I could reproduce some of the aerodynamic properties and
behaviour of the real-life vectored-thrust/canard equipped SU-30
series aircraft in YASim. For the most part, I felt it was
successful but there are some serio
Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Durk Talsma:
> While I'm at it. :-)
>
> With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
> highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
> Completeness,
> variability across categories, realism, suitabili
"Vivian Meazza" wrote:
> I would personally like to see a float/seaplane included
Oh yes, to support this idea, I'm going to add Vancouver Coal Harbour
(now: Vancouver Harbour Water Airport) to our airport list ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its
"Matthew Tippett" wrote:
> With the intent being the terrasync thread can point to multiple
> repositories for data - low/medium/high resolution. Possibly using a
> bittorrent style sharing mechanism to share the bandwidth load :).
We're in negotiations for having a nice - somehow 'sponsored' -
Durk Talsma wrote:
> While I'm at it. :-)
>
> With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
> highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
> Completeness,
> variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo flights (think
> of
> aerotow
Hi,
> ... * EC135
I vote against this! Thanks for that, but I don't think only the appearence of
modeling should count. The main thing of our helis are that they are really
realistic- much more maybe than other sims ( MSFS anyway).
Though of lacking data, the ec135 in opposite to the bo105 o
, October 5, 2008 4:13:54 AM
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Call for aircraft nominations
While I'm at it. :-)
With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include: Completeness,
variability across categories,
* Christian Schmitt -- Sunday 05 October 2008:
> I clearly vote for the Concorde here.
>From the Concord developer:
"Note that with OSG, many 2D hotspots are missing inside the Concorde
(that works with Plib). Perhaps because of clipping of 2D panels by 3D
flatness."
Though that doesn't really
>
> If we're aiming for a release around Christmas then I
> could probably get
> a set of full 3d instruments done before then. (I can
> probably cheat and
> steal most of them from the Grob 115 and just update the
> instrument face
> textures).
>
> Jon
I know- for this my thanks goes to Thor
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Terrasync does not work with Windows (it needs Cygwin, which is a bridge
> too
> far for many of our customers). I would recommend that we do not consider
> any scheme which requires terrasync.
As mentioned previously here and other places,
I would love to see the Su-37 in the base release. However, it seems like it
still needs some work. What is your opinion?
-Ummon
___
On 5 Oct 2008, at 09:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
> So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
> aircraft?
Before the deba
It was meant more as a concept...
Although with dedicated servers (effectively the same as the current
rsync servers), there should always be a subset of servers providing
all the data. Extra users seeding and sharing at runtime would just
be gravy. Incomplete data would be just as likely as a b
Matthew Tippett wrote
> Yes. Terrasync.
>
> With the intent being the terrasync thread can point to multiple
> repositories for data - low/medium/high resolution. Possibly using a
> bittorrent style sharing mechanism to share the bandwidth load :).
>
> Regards... Matthew
>
>
> On 10/5/08,
Matthew Tippett wrote:
> Yes. Terrasync.
>
> With the intent being the terrasync thread can point to multiple
> repositories for data - low/medium/high resolution. Possibly using a
> bittorrent style sharing mechanism to share the bandwidth load :).
Bittorrent is ok for downloading huge chunks
Yes. Terrasync.
With the intent being the terrasync thread can point to multiple
repositories for data - low/medium/high resolution. Possibly using a
bittorrent style sharing mechanism to share the bandwidth load :).
Regards... Matthew
On 10/5/08, Ralf Gerlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mat
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Matthew Tippett wrote:
> This is sounding like a 'base' and a 'full' or 'extras' release packages.
>
> The base release should contain what is suggested here - a collection
> of best of breed aircraft for particular classes that people are
> interested in.
>
> The 'full
Matthew Tippett wrote:
> Likewise with scenery. The default location and whatever demo
> locations should ship with reasonably detailed scenery + other common
> locations. The 'full' brings in other common scenery, and 'extras'
> brings in everything else. (Integrating terragear as a thread with
James Turner wrote
>
>
> On 5 Oct 2008, at 09:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
>
> > So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
> > aircraft?
>
> Before the debate gets too details, there intention was (and still is,
> I think) to have at least one aircraft from the following
This is sounding like a 'base' and a 'full' or 'extras' release packages.
The base release should contain what is suggested here - a collection
of best of breed aircraft for particular classes that people are
interested in.
The 'full' provides a collection of 'complete' aircraft, but may
duplicat
James Turner schrieb:
> On 5 Oct 2008, at 09:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
>
>
>> So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
>> aircraft?
>>
>
> Before the debate gets too details, there intention was (and still is,
> I think) to have at least one aircraft from the fol
On 5 Oct 2008, at 09:13, Durk Talsma wrote:
> So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
> aircraft?
Before the debate gets too details, there intention was (and still is,
I think) to have at least one aircraft from the following categories:
- the c172
- another
Martin Spott wrote:
> Durk Talsma wrote:
>
>> So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
>> aircraft?
>
> I'd be very happy to see Heiko's overhauled C172 model included in the
> release. The outer hull is waaay better than the old one, yet the
> inners still need a li
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> If you are doing all that work, it might be worth de-coupling the c172p from
> all the other c172 Aircraft in CVS (c172, c172r), so it is self-contained and
> we only have to include a single directory.
Actually I thought I had done that already quite some time ago?
An
Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Martin wrote:
> > Durk Talsma wrote:
> > > So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your
> > current top 10 of
> > > aircraft?
> >
> > I'd be very happy to see Heiko's overhauled C172
> > model included in the
> > release. The outer hull is waaay better than the old on
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
> On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
> > On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > We should definitely add one of the airships.
> > >
> > > Oh- yes, indeed! aAnd with this one JSBSim-aircraft which is cap
Hi,
>
> But as Durk said the planes shouldn't be to heavy
> sized...
> F-14 is almost 25 mb! Wouldn't that be to heavy?
Depends on the other aircrafts we choose! ;-)
We don't should forget, that with the quality also raises the size! And our
aircrafts get better and better!
Looking at MSFS: t
Hello,
> Durk Talsma wrote:
>
> > So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your
> current top 10 of
> > aircraft?
>
> I'd be very happy to see Heiko's overhauled C172
> model included in the
> release. The outer hull is waaay better than the old one,
> yet the
> inners still need a little
>> Forgot ne aircraft: the F14 is really nice and has a lot of features! It
>> should be in the package! >> >> Cheers>> HHS
But as Durk said the planes shouldn't be to heavy sized...
F-14 is almost 25 mb! Wouldn't that be to heavy?
Forgot ne aircraft: the F14 is really nice and has a lot of features! It should
be in the package!
Cheers
HHS
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux ba
Durk Talsma wrote:
> So, with these criteria in mind, what would be your current top 10 of
> aircraft?
I'd be very happy to see Heiko's overhauled C172 model included in the
release. The outer hull is waaay better than the old one, yet the
inners still need a little bit more touch,
Mart
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, gerard robin wrote:
> On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > We should definitely add one of the airships.
> >
> > Oh- yes, indeed! aAnd with this one JSBSim-aircraft which is capable to
> > start from carrier now!
>
> Which won't be possible
On dimanche 05 octobre 2008, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > We should definitely add one of the airships.
>
> Oh- yes, indeed! aAnd with this one JSBSim-aircraft which is capable to
> start from carrier now!
Which won't be possible, because there is missing the Carrier position
calculation ( i
Hi,
>
> We should definitely add one of the airships.
>
Oh- yes, indeed! aAnd with this one JSBSim-aircraft which is capable to start
from carrier now!
>
>
> Ask on IRC, or one of the developers per mail (you find
> their
> names in the cvs-logs list), or post a link to your
> aircraft
> her
* Heiko Schulz -- Sunday 05 October 2008:
> I think we don't should change the base package.
We should definitely add one of the airships.
> I will try to get most of my projects now into CVS, [...]
Ask on IRC, or one of the developers per mail (you find their
names in the cvs-logs list), or p
Hi,
> Great to hear we gonna have a new release this year!
>
> I would like to have the 747-400 in the list, but if I read
> these two points:
> - disk space (what is the maximum?)
> - completeness (when is a plane completed?)
> I don't think it would be suitable ;)My top 10, in
> alphabetical
A380
Boeing 737-300
Boeing 787
C172P
Citation Bravo
EC135
Seahawk
SenecaII
UFO
Zeppelin NT07
Feel free to adjust the list.
Gijs
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Date:
> Sun, 5 Oct 2008 10:13:54 +0200> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Call for air
Durk Talsma wrote:
> While I'm at it. :-)
>
> With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
> highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include:
> Completeness,
> variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo flights (think
> of
> aeroto
While I'm at it. :-)
With each release we include a selection of representative aircraft that
highlight FlightGear's capabilities. Inclusion criteria include: Completeness,
variability across categories, realism, suitability for demo flights (think of
aerotowing, AI/Multiplayer refueling, carri
41 matches
Mail list logo