@Curt: in the media subforum ;-)
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:46:08 +0100
> From: joac...@gmx.de
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Final 2.6.0 Release Preparations
>
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:38:59 -0600
> Curtis Olson wrote:
>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:38:59 -0600
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Obviously I need to steer clear of images that show development or testing
> features that are not yet available in the v2.6 release
What about custom scenery?
Joe
I would also like to put a call out for screen shots for the v2.6 release.
What I'm looking for is an honest representation of FlightGear v2.6, but
of course shown in the best light/angles/environment possible. I'm ok with
images generated from pre-releases or release candidates. Obviously I nee
ThorstenB wrote:
> Every free, open source project is really driven by active community
> _participation_, [...]
I overly agree with the opinions presented by the two Thorsten's !
Aside from that I'd like to point out that I'm having mixed feelings
concerning the prominent use of the term "comm
> The FlightGear development team is happy to announce the v2.6.0
> release of FlightGear, the free, open-source flight simulator. This
> new version contains many exciting new features, enhancements and
> bugfixes. Major improvements from v2.4.0 include reduced AI aircraft
> load times, easier gra
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:16 AM, ThorstenB wrote:
> Every free, open source project is really driven by active community
> _participation_, not so much by (passive) user's _requests_. In general,
> it's not even a matter of economic incentives, though this may be the
> case with FG. But you can se
Am 11.02.2012 16:32, schrieb Ron Jensen:
> I found and fixed a potential NaN and Segfault in the JSBSim propeller code
> yesterday. It could be considered a blocking bug for 2.6 to me.
Thanks, looks like a small and safe enough patch which we should push to
the 2.6.0 branch.
cheers,
Thorsten
--
On Friday 10 February 2012 04:08:32 Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for our release of version 2.6.0 next week, we have a few open items on
> our checklist and I am kindly asking for support to get them done:
>
> 1. How are our release candidates performing? Are there any release
> blocking bug
Am 11.02.2012 10:40, schrieb thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi:
>> Best of all, the new features are based on user community requests, and
>> > not driven by economic incentives. Some of these features are already in
>> > the works for the next FG release [give continuity message about the
>> > development
> Best of all, the new features are based on user community requests, and
> not driven by economic incentives. Some of these features are already in
> the works for the next FG release [give continuity message about the
> development]
That'd be suspiciously close to dishonest advertizing. I spend
000
> From: stuar...@gmail.com
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Final 2.6.0 Release Preparations
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Tuomad wrote:
> > "best of all, it's open source and developed by an active group of people
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Tuomad wrote:
> "best of all, it's open source and developed by an active group of people
> with different backgrounds - a group that welcomes people like you to be
> part of the community." ?
>
>
> Or is that attempting a too big group hug? ;^)
The idea I was try
"best of all, it's open source and developed by an active group of people with
different backgrounds - a group that welcomes people like you to be part of the
community." ?
Or is that attempting a too big group hug? ;^)
//Tuomad
On 10.2.2012 19:48 Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On 10 Feb 2012, at 15
On 10 Feb 2012, at 15:25, "James A. Treacy" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:09:53PM +, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>> FlightGear features more than 400 aircraft, a worldwide scenery
>> database, detailed sky modelling, a flexible and open aircraft
>> modelling system, varied networking options,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:09:53PM +, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I've added the following as the synopsis for the changelog, which should be
> suitable:
>
> The FlightGear development team is happy to announce the v2.6.0
> release of FlightGear, the free, open-source flight simulator. This
> new
>
> The FlightGear development team is happy to announce the v2.6.0
> release of FlightGear, the free, open-source flight simulator. This
> new version contains many exciting new features, enhancements and
> bugfixes. Major improvements from v2.4.0 include reduced AI aircraft
> load times, easier
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> 2. What is the state of our changelog?
> http://wiki.flightgear.org/Changelog_2.6.0 - Please everybody who
> contributed to the core and fgdata, check the document and fill in the gaps.
I've just gone through this, tidied up the grammar and
>
> 3. We need a short official announcement to be sent out to press, fs
> websites, newstickers, CBS, NBC, al-Arabia, ITAR-TASS et al. I'd prefer
> a native English speaker to write on or two enthusiastic paragraphs
> about FlightGear 2.6.0.
>
For my point of view it is worth to put some effort
18 matches
Mail list logo
