On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Martin Spott wrote:
>> ..easy now, without a willingness to defend FlightGear copyright,
>
> Just a repetition of the above. Oh my, what an outstanding example of
> canned nonsense,
>
Yeah, but he stamps "New and Improved!" on his can of nonsense, so it's
ok, right? *snickers*
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:44:25 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
> > <4def2504.8020...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
> >
> >> > If you really want to fight those scamers,
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
> <4def2504.8020...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
>
>> > If you really want to fight those scamers, there's a very simple
>> > way to do that: inform people.
>
> ..about what, Flig
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
<4def2504.8020...@gmail.com>:
> On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
> > If you really want to fight those scamers, there's a very simple
> > way to do that: inform people.
..about what, FlightGear authors lack of willingness
On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
> quote fred: "There is nothing that could prevent to release it under the
> GPL, but in
> the light of
> recent events (read FPS) I am not fond of releasing something that
> couldn't be used.."
Don't cut quotes. Fred actually agreed to release it under the
On Sun, 6/5/11, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
From: Frederic Bouvier
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Terrain engine
To: "FlightGear developers discussions"
Date: Sunday, June 5, 2011, 7:17 PM
Le 05/06/2011 09:34, Michael Sgier a écrit :
> Salut Frederic
> what happened to the t
> Well, these video are real, but the absence of update is an indication
> of the progress (or lack thereof) of the project.
>
> Regards,
> -Fred
Wish best to You with it anyway. It's not good when something is stops
on the middle. For me it's better then You can say: "Well, maybe it's
not used.
- "Martin Spott" a écrit :
> Hi Frederic,
>
> Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
> >> 0) Does it meet the technical requirements for being used in
> >>FlightGear ?
> > I'll let you elaborate on this topic before I could answer.
>
> My comment was addressing those who are judging over the usabil
> I'll let you elaborate on this topic before I could answer.
Frederic, thank You for answer. It seems what it's become more or less
clear now.
I think it's reasonable to test osgEarth at least to compare speed,
exactness, and including possibilities then. If Your engine is
completely different o
Hi Frederic,
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>> 0) Does it meet the technical requirements for being used in
>>FlightGear ?
> I'll let you elaborate on this topic before I could answer.
My comment was addressing those who are judging over the usability just
from watching a video on YouTube :-)
Bes
Le 05/06/2011 09:34, Michael Sgier a écrit :
> Salut Frederic
> what happened to the terrain engine, that you show at youtube? Could
> we get that into fgfs sometimes?
> Regards Michael
>
> On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 13:07 +0400, Slavutinsky Victor wrote:
>>> > > -Fred
>> >
>> > Little bit other topi
11 matches
Mail list logo
