* Josh Babcock -- Tuesday 13 June 2006 04:33:
I also feel, however, that there are some important things
missing from the FDM.
For instance: translational lift, [...]
Translational lift is implelemented. According to Maik it's just not
realistic yet.
Hi,
Simply my problem is like this:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/6794/f7im.jpg
The Sim works ok,but everything rendered without textures.I use
FG-cvs,simgear-cvs,plib-1.8.4,Kubuntu Dapper Drake.
Any other GL app works like a charm.No texture problem.
What have i miss?
Regards
Savas
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:50:34 +0200, Major wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As to my suggestion of linking FG and X-Plane to fly FG on VATSIM, I
haven't forgotten the project but haven't actually got a working
installation of X-Plane under Linux that would allow me to write a
plugin. I'll
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:37:39 +0200, Major wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..you've probably heard drop ATI windroid driver and use Xorg's
ati|radeon before. Very recent video card?
X600, there's no 3D support in Xorg, AFAIR.
..unless you have Alzheimer and still remember
Hi,
Simply my problem is like this:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/6794/f7im.jpg
The Sim works ok,but everything rendered without textures.I use
FG-cvs,simgear-cvs,plib-1.8.4,Kubuntu Dapper Drake.
Any other GL app works like a charm.No texture problem.
What have i miss?
Regards
Savas
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:12:16 +, savas wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Simply my problem is like this:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/6794/f7im.jpg
..huh??? A square sun??? You are definetly _somethere_, but which
galaxy??? ;o)
The Sim works ok,but everything rendered
As to IVAO, it appears to be a much smaller community that VATSIM, so
it's not even worth talking about in this context.
Is a 61,400 member community not worth talking about? :)
If you're based in Europe then IVAO is normally a lot more active during the
evenings than VATSIM - one of the
Major A wrote:
I see another issue here. Even if the licensing issue is solved, there
would
still be problems. For example, planes hovering/submerging on taxiways and
runways, because both us and MSFS have different scenery. To avoid this
problem, we would have to force MSFS to use
Martin Spott wrote:
Hmm, do M$F$ and X-Plane use different ellipsoids for their scenery ?
To my understanding as long as both use an international acknowledged
reference system like WGS84, then there should not be the requirement
for a reference point.
Everything in FlightGear that relates to
Mark wrote:
I just was reading through the newest issue of the german Linux-Magazin.
They have a report about the Linux-Tag on page 28 and Flightgear is
shortly mentioned in the article.
Plus a picture is shown of someone demonstrating the three-window setup.
Oh yeah, they have three
As to IVAO, it appears to be a much smaller community that VATSIM, so
it's not even worth talking about in this context.
Is a 61,400 member community not worth talking about? :)
I just wanted to check myself, but the website doesn't seem to be very
functional...
If you're based in
X600, there's no 3D support in Xorg, AFAIR.
..unless you have Alzheimer and still remember checking
while you wrote this, chk this moving target again. ;o)
No, I'm not quite old enough for Alzheimer's. You're right, the latest
version does seem to do 3D on my card (at least glxinfo
The main problem here is when aircraft from other simulators taxi around
airports. Unfortunately, this is one of the most interesting things to
look at. FG could perhaps come up with a heuristic for deciding when an
aircraft has WOW and force it to ground level. Again, that could begin
What exactly do you mean by compromising Open Source in the
context of getting FG working with closed source/proprietary
software?
While I much prefer O/S I'll use whatever software I want and
don't feel any qualms about using C/S proprietary software.
Software is a tool, not a religion and
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 22:13, Major A wrote:
As to IVAO, it appears to be a much smaller community that VATSIM, so
it's not even worth talking about in this context.
Is a 61,400 member community not worth talking about? :)
I just wanted to check myself, but the website doesn't seem
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The issue is that the specific elevation of a specific point on the
earth can be different between sims.
Ok, this is obvious and in fact is an issue of scenery fidelity, but
it is not a problem that could be resolved by any reference point, as
suspected in the
On 6/13/06, Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to my suggestion of linking FG and X-Plane to fly FG on VATSIM,
i think better, would be to provide an integration within x-plane that
would allow it to use the FG MP server system.
x-plane has an SDK that would make this quite possible i think,
On 6/13/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The issue is that the specific elevation of a specific point on the
earth can be different between sims.
Ok, this is obvious and in fact is an issue of scenery fidelity, but
it is not a problem that could be resolved
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 22:20:08 +0200, Major wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
X600, there's no 3D support in Xorg, AFAIR.
..unless you have Alzheimer and still remember checking
while you wrote this, chk this moving target again. ;o)
No, I'm not quite old enough for Alzheimer's.
Martin Spott wrote:
Josh Babcock wrote:
For instance: translational lift, ground effect, retreating blade stall,
and VRS. I don't think that there is any kind of realism regarding the
energy model for the blades. (AFAIK, all they do is spool up to the
specified rpm when the engines are
savas yatmaz wrote:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/6794/f7im.jpg
Cool. PsychedelicGear. Kick the tires, light the fires, and drop a tab.
Josh
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Josh Babcock wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
This is what nowadays is done even on many model helicopters: They
spool up the whole thing, activate the governor, which typically part
of a FADEC in large helicopters, and have the rotor running at fixed
speed for the whole trip.
Assuming that you
Martin Spott schrieb:
BTW, we should form a FlightGear PR department which consists of an
official press contact (where in fact all the work is being dumped :-)
and a little 'corona' of people to whom the work should be delegated -
at least in theory.
I'd say Pigeon definitely belongs to
Martin Spott wrote:
I want to see a simulation of what is supposed to happen during a
flight and I'm quite satisfied for now. Apparently you want to see a
simulation of what is _not_ supposed to happen during a flight, so your
expecations and your valuation of what's already there differs
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:42:15 -0400, Josh wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
savas yatmaz wrote:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/6794/f7im.jpg
Cool. PsychedelicGear. Kick the tires, light the fires, and drop a
tab.
..close. Light the tires, kick the fires, then drop the tab. ;o)
Sal 13 20:15 tarihinde, Arnt Karlsen şunları yazmıştı:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:12:16 +, savas wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Simply my problem is like this:
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/6794/f7im.jpg
..huh??? A square sun??? You are definetly _somethere_, but
At a guess: Is the 1280x1024 setting causing your adapter to run at 256
colours with palletising ?
The sun really is round .. I think someone is a bit snow blind ..
P
--
=
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 23:26, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:29:05 +0100, Lee wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What exactly do you mean by compromising Open Source in the
context of getting FG working with closed source/proprietary
software?
..usually this is done by
Martin Spott schrieb:
I don't claim the helicopter FDM in FlightGear is perfect, but turning
it down just because a few details are missing, whereas most of the
actual in-flight behaviour is pretty well done, is unjustified,
..
..
Usually it _is_ my intention to stay within
On 6/13/06, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Pelton wrote:
Read Curt's posting,
i did ... and i think i _do_ understand the basics of the issue ...
he simply assumes that the ground elevation at a
specific location differs between two sims. Different sims have their
scenery
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 02:04:17 +0100, Lee wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 23:26, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:29:05 +0100, Lee wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What exactly do you mean by compromising Open Source in the
context of getting
* Georg Vollnhals -- Wednesday 14 June 2006 03:02:
Take the BO105 and goo for a straight and level flight with 100-120
knts. Then push the collective down. [...]
Try it with the BO105 - see what happens?
You are not only able to hold height with pulling the stick back but to
climb with up
32 matches
Mail list logo
