Hi Shad,
what you want to do should be possible. Many internals are exposed through the
property tree, which is accesible in many ways.
There is a http and a telnet interface ready for use. A powerful thing is the
interface with a freely configurable protocol to send and receive properties.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Maik Justus
Sent: 18 December 2007 23:12
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] External Cargo, was: Re:
screenshots (and snapshots)
Hi Viviam,
Vivian Meazza
Shad Young wrote:
I am coming from the MSFS world and have not had a lot of time to
explore FlightGear yet in great detail (been having to much fun flying
it). The next thing to do will be to include specific hydraulic
failures, as these seem to be lacking, or did I miss this?
Hi Shad,
Hi,
Curtis Olson schrieb am 19.12.2007 01:19:
On Dec 18, 2007 5:21 PM, Maik Justus wrote:
Heikos page is now working for me with also some other screenshots
(worth to be in the gallerie, too):
http://www.hoerbird.net/index.htm
Hi, right now I still cannot connect ... would
--- Maik Justus [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi,
Curtis Olson schrieb am 19.12.2007 01:19:
On Dec 18, 2007 5:21 PM, Maik Justus wrote:
Heikos page is now working for me with also
some other screenshots
(worth to be in the gallerie, too):
http://www.hoerbird.net/index.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Holger Wirtz wrote:
Hi Arvid,
No, yes, no... yes it's a kind of bug. I had such things not in mind as
I wrote fgcom. There should be a feature that allows to use the echo box
even if you are authenticated to the server but this works only as
On mer 19 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
Hm another issue: in S-51-on_carrier one of the aircrafts in the background
seems partly below deck?
Hello, Arvid
If you want i can UP the elevator. :)
Cheers
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
Hey Ralf,
Thanks for that! Sorry I should of worked that out myself!
Thanks,
Will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/19/07 12:13pm
Hi Will!
will Pink wrote:
VPFBASE points to /stage/fgfs01/curt/RawData/Collections/VPF-Extracted
You need to point that variable to the place where you extracted your
Many of the shots are quite good. But some are ... umm ...
http://www.flightgear.org/Gallery-v1.0/Link/787fujiuy6.html
Dark bump-mapped cloud soup on the bottom, an almost perfect
presentation of our white-mountain/blue-sky bug, and lots of
aliasing steps. Not exactly a teaser.
This is
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Chris Metzler wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:33:52 +0100
AnMaster wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hm another issue: in S-51-on_carrier one of the aircrafts in the
background seems partly below deck?
It's on an elevator, if I'm not
Hi Will!
will Pink wrote:
VPFBASE points to /stage/fgfs01/curt/RawData/Collections/VPF-Extracted
You need to point that variable to the place where you extracted your
VPF-data.
The script expects the parts for the different regions in the
subdirectories noamer, eurnasia, soamafr, and sasaus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Yes much easier to see what is happening.:D
Regards,
Arvid Norlander
gerard robin wrote:
On mer 19 décembre 2007, gerard robin wrote:
On mer 19 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
Hm another issue: in S-51-on_carrier one of the aircrafts in the
LeeE wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:52, Tiago Gusmão wrote:
LeeE wrote:
Hi all,
I've noticed recently that after re-loading an autopilot the
filters that are being used seem to be getting a bit
'confused'. I spotted it when I was comparing the unfiltered
input with the filtered
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:56, Tiago Gusmão wrote:
LeeE wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:52, Tiago Gusmão wrote:
LeeE wrote:
Hi all,
I've noticed recently that after re-loading an autopilot the
filters that are being used seem to be getting a bit
'confused'. I spotted it
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:33:26 +0100
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
(snip good suggestions about various pictures in the gallery)
The one big suggestion I'd make is to drop the current caption for
each photo, which appears to just be the base filename for each
image, and replace it with a brief bit of
On mar 18 décembre 2007, Curtis Olson wrote:
SNIP
5. Can someone send an image of the osprey with it's rotors all folded up?
SNIP
Thanks,
Curt.
Here Osprey with rotors all folded up, on elevator
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Osprey_on_carrier.jpg
I only got huge difficulties
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Chris Metzler wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:33:26 +0100
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
(snip good suggestions about various pictures in the gallery)
The one big suggestion I'd make is to drop the current caption for
each photo, which appears to just be the base filename for
* Chris Metzler -- Wednesday 19 December 2007:
Lightning-KSFO-06-- why does the page visitor need to know
Well, the whole screenshot isn't something that a visitor should know. ;-)
The lightning is quite small in the middle in a rather not-so-interesting
position.
Oh, and I'd keep trying
Hi Gerard,
gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 14:44:
Here Osprey with rotors all folded up, on elevator
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Osprey_on_carrier.jpg
I only got huge difficulties because, when the elevator get down ( mid
position) the blades suddenly fall down ???
The
On mer 19 décembre 2007, AnMaster wrote:
Seems like someone compressed a jpeg compressed image instead of basing
them all on a looseless original. The result is that the artifacts add up
and the images look bad. For best result all the smaller images should be
generated from a looseless
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi Gerard,
gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 14:44:
Here Osprey with rotors all folded up, on elevator
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Osprey_on_carrier.jpg
I only got huge difficulties because, when the elevator get down ( mid
Hi Stuart,
Sadly I have never heard of the Nasal Scripting Language. I will Google
it and see what I can learn.
The aircraft in question is the Pilatus PC-9, so I was thinking of
extending the existing PC-7 to reflect the more powerful engine etc.
Cheers
Shad
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Shad
On Dec 19, 2007 8:24 AM, AnMaster wrote:
The one big suggestion I'd make is to drop the current caption for
each photo, which appears to just be the base filename for each
image, and replace it with a brief bit of text that describes what
we're looking at.
I don't have time to do this
Hello, carrier users
Working with FG official V-1.0.0 data and source, i cannot get the carrier
elevators to work :(
Does somebody else has checked it
Regards
--
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/
-
SF.Net
On Dec 14, 2007 6:43 AM, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
For a new release, especially one with version number 1.0, we
should provide some new screenshots for the website.
I have updated the gallery page one more time this morning:
http://www.flightgear.org/Gallery-v1.0/
Please check it out and
LeeE wrote:
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 12:56, Tiago Gusmão wrote:
LeeE wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 22:52, Tiago Gusmão wrote:
LeeE wrote:
Hi all,
I've noticed recently that after re-loading an autopilot the
filters that are being used seem to be getting a bit
'confused'. I
Much better now. :-)
But the v22 on the elevator is cheating (and thus violating
my personal diktator policies). You can't realistically land
it there, and there's no way to move a v22 to the elevator
once landed. Cheated screenshots have annoyed me since
years ... almost decades. Pretty
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Much better now. :-)
But the v22 on the elevator is cheating (and thus violating
my personal diktator policies). You can't realistically land
it there, and there's no way to move a v22 to the elevator
once landed. Cheated screenshots have
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Shad Young -- Wednesday 19 December 2007:
I wanted to keep it cross-platform, but now that there is mention of an
HTML interface, I am going to suggest to my client that a PHP/web
interface might be a good way to go. But then again, this might require
an
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 19 December 2007:
I don't agree, :)
in reality the Osprey lands on Carrier, and is 'driven' to the hangar
(elevator).
OK, so far you *agree* ... :-)
Within FG when you have land it on the Carrier you can manage to taxis it(
admit not easy) with
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Shad Young wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Sadly I have never heard of the Nasal Scripting Language. I will Google.
The short summary is that Nasal is a scripting language that is tightly
integrated with FlightGear itself, and provides a very easy way to manipulate
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Detlef Faber wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 17:17 +0100 schrieb gerard robin:
Hello, carrier users
Working with FG official V-1.0.0 data and source, i cannot get the
carrier elevators to work :(
Does somebody else has checked it
I made the f4u shots with
Hi Gerard,
gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 15:51:
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi Gerard,
gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 14:44:
Here Osprey with rotors all folded up, on elevator
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/Osprey_on_carrier.jpg
I only got huge
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi Gerard,
gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 15:51:
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
Hi Gerard,
gerard robin schrieb am 19.12.2007 14:44:
Here Osprey with rotors all folded up, on elevator
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 19 December 2007:
I don't agree, :)
in reality the Osprey lands on Carrier, and is 'driven' to the hangar
(elevator).
OK, so far you *agree* ... :-)
Within FG when you have land it on the Carrier you can
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 17:17 +0100 schrieb gerard robin:
Hello, carrier users
Working with FG official V-1.0.0 data and source, i cannot get the carrier
elevators to work :(
Does somebody else has checked it
I made the f4u shots with V1.0 too. I had to enable the operate
Hello Flightgear Developer(s),
I was thinking of this idea and I thought you might like it.
You might have guessed already by the subject of the e-mail. I was thinking
of maybe someone could make different versions of trees and make someking of
a tool that puts a number a number of trees in a a
* Pavel T -- Wednesday 19 December 2007:
I was thinking of this idea and I thought you might like it.
You might have guessed already by the subject of the e-mail. I was thinking
of maybe someone could make different versions of trees and make someking of
a tool that puts a number a number of
On 19/12/2007, gerard robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On mer 19 décembre 2007, Pavel T wrote:
Hello Flightgear Developer(s),
I was thinking of this idea and I thought you might like it.
You might have guessed already by the subject of the e-mail. I was thinking
of maybe someone could make
Pavel T schrieb:
Hello Flightgear Developer(s),
I was thinking of this idea and I thought you might like it.
You might have guessed already by the subject of the e-mail. I was
thinking of maybe someone could make different versions of trees and
make someking of a tool that puts a number a
--- Georg Vollnhals [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Pavel T schrieb:
Hello Flightgear Developer(s),
I was thinking of this idea and I thought you
might like it.
You might have guessed already by the subject of
the e-mail. I was
thinking of maybe someone could make different
versions of
--- Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
* Georg Vollnhals -- Wednesday 19 December 2007:
You asked on the FG forum for driving cars. I made
an example a long
time ago with a driving truck on the EDDW airport.
BTW: the ufo does since a while export flightplans.
You just
select an
Yet work in progress but it may become a worthwhile addition to the carrier
borne aircraft in a short while
Done with 4x FSAA
http://sfp1.site.voila.fr/flightgear/TomcatNimitz.jpg
Greetings
Enrique
-
SF.Net email is
Hi all,
Perhaps this is a better question for the users list, but what is the
preferred method to compile on a Win32 platform? Cygwin or something
like Visual C++ 2008 Express?
If Cygwin, are the instructions for the Cygwin method on the FG website
still valid for this version, or are there
Hi all,
Again not sure if I should post this to the users list.
I have been experimenting with the latest FG 1.0.0 on Win32 (XP SP2) and
am having some rather significant frame dropping.
FPS on or near the ground at San Fran in all AC often results in long
pauses and jumps, with regular
On Dec 20, 2007 1:57 AM, Shad Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps this is a better question for the users list, but what is the
preferred method to compile on a Win32 platform? Cygwin or something
like Visual C++ 2008 Express?
If Cygwin, are the instructions for the Cygwin method on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I don't know where it is on windows but on Linux there is an xml in
$HOME/.fgfs/autosave.xml and for each aircraft $HOME/.fgfs/aircraft-data/*.xml.
Regards,
Arvid Norlander
Shad Young wrote:
Hi all,
Again not sure if I should post this to the
Csaba Halász wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 1:57 AM, Shad Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps this is a better question for the users list, but what is the
preferred method to compile on a Win32 platform? Cygwin or something
like Visual C++ 2008 Express?
If Cygwin, are the instructions for
AnMaster wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I don't know where it is on windows but on Linux there is an xml in
$HOME/.fgfs/autosave.xml and for each aircraft
$HOME/.fgfs/aircraft-data/*.xml.
Regards,
Arvid Norlander
Shad Young wrote:
Hi all,
Again not sure
On Dec 20, 2007 4:02 AM, Shad Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Csaba Halász wrote:
Just building with Visual C++ 2008, following these instructions:
http://www.oflebbe.de/oflebbe/FlightGear/index.html
Only caveat up to now, you have to manually copy simgear_config.h.vc5
to
On Monday 17 December 2007 09:15:23 am Tim Moore wrote:
Robert Black wrote:
...
I did a CVS update Sunday and couldn't compile it. Simgear updated and I
upgraded from OSG 2.0 to 2.2 with the same results.
This looks like a problem with the way you upgraded OpenSceneGraph.
OpenThreads is
Selon Shad Young :
I tried to remove FG using the uninstall program and then cleaning out
the registry, deleting the folder etc, but it seems to be keeping the
settings that I had with FG 0.9.10 (is there an INI somewhere other than
in the FG folder in Program Files?)
Ok, I found the
There is an important growing trend now in software applications to make
them portable in the sense that the complete installation resides in
it's one directory.
There is no writing to the registry and any ini stuff is kept in the
same directory as the program.
This enables the program to
53 matches
Mail list logo
