Alex Perry wrote:
How does it work? Where is the source code for the serving side of
the OAM stuff?
As far as I remember there's an SVN link somewhere on the explanatory
pages. Chris is known for doing (almost) every backend stuff in Python,
which typically works - we're successfully using
* Oliver Schroeder -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
I noticed that fgjs is broken, it looks into
/usr/local/share/FlightGear/Input/Joysticks/template.xml instead
of /usr/local/share/FlightGear/data/Input/Joysticks/template.xml.
fgjs is correct. Don't use the data version. I wonder why people
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Yes, indeed- the shadows were outstanding- selfshadowing aircrafts -
we had this feature before MSFS even! No it's gone- and the new shadows
are only very small progressing...
Would you consider adding your workforce and spare time to a project
where you monitor - while
Would it be feasible to reserve the 'a' for aircraft specific and 'x'
for experimental features?
Erik
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based
* Erik Hofman -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
Would it be feasible to reserve the 'a' for aircraft specific and 'x'
for experimental features?
'x' for experimental seems fine. 'a' for aircraft is a problem, as I
think we should keep using that for the autopilot. There are a lot
of autopilot
Am Thursday 02 October 2008 09:49:15 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
fgjs is correct. Don't use the data version. I wonder why people
even think they should set $FG_ROOT to a data/ directory. Is there
some obsolete documentation floating around?
No, it's from the CVS Resources page on flightgear.org.
On mercredi 01 octobre 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 01 October 2008:
we will now need a multi help map behind the keyboard :) .
:-P
I have planned to offer a list of options per level on request
(TAB key). But I also expect that people quickly memorize the
Hi,
Would you consider adding your workforce and spare time to
a project
where you monitor - while lurking on the list - that people
are getting
pissed at just for having their own opinion ?
Basically, the crowd gets what they deserve: As long as the
perpetual
[b,f]laming and false
* gerard robin -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
Sorry I send that message again, because i guess it has been lost
No, it didn't get lost. And I have replied to it, but like my first
message about multikey it never made it to the list. Will probably
come later. Here's my response again:
* gerard
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
Would it be feasible to reserve the 'a' for aircraft specific and 'x'
for experimental features?
'x' for experimental seems fine. 'a' for aircraft is a problem, as I
think we should keep using that for the
Hi,
in case someone care, here is what I am doing for about a year :
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/yafseng_2.avi [Xvid, 7.698kb]
This is very preliminary stuff and sources are not published yet. The
data come from Blue Marble NG that has a resolution of 15 arc-seconds.
It is an OSG program
On jeudi 02 octobre 2008, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
in case someone care, here is what I am doing for about a year :
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/yafseng_2.avi [Xvid, 7.698kb]
This is very preliminary stuff and sources are not published yet. The
data come from Blue Marble NG that has
gerard robin wrote:
I only wonder about the srtm4 quality, we hope that details are right, for
instance the sea coastline and other water coastline.
Au contraire SRTM is about ground elevation. Coastline is a
different topic and experience has shown that all these nice attempts
to
Au contraire SRTM is about ground elevation.
Coastline is a
different topic and experience has shown that all these
nice attempts
to automagically derive coastlines from imagery, be it SWBD
or PGS,
return pretty flaky results. Unfortunately
Ground elevation in sea too? If
On jeudi 02 octobre 2008, Martin Spott wrote:
gerard robin wrote:
I only wonder about the srtm4 quality, we hope that details are right,
for instance the sea coastline and other water coastline.
Au contraire
:) :) :) in frenchthanks
SRTM is about ground elevation. Coastline is a
In adition to your proposal, could you add the Tacan Setting
like you offer about Radio Settings
Sure. The current config is just a start. It should demonstrate
the system and encourage developers to discuss the most efficient
key scheme. All sections are still very basic, there's a
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:22 AM, jean pellotier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nice to see that tacan was added, just something's wrong: x and y
have to be replaced by X and Y in the lines:
scriptsettacan(arg[0], X)/script
scriptsettacan(arg[0], Y)/script
my 2 cents, jano.
fixed and
Ok, apparently my response got lost - again so, here's my second
attempt:
gerard robin wrote:
Well, i thought that costline was calculated with the intersection of the
sea level (or water level) and the ground altitude.
I was wrong, my imagination was (is) out of reality. :)
* Tatsuhiro Nishioka -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
I didn't change the key names, so you type :rt028x and 028X is set.
Which do you guys prefer, :rt028X/Y or :rt028x/y? I prefer the latter
though.
Lower case letters were intended and approved by the
TACAN man on irc. I just didn't realize that
* Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
* Tatsuhiro Nishioka -- Thursday 02 October 2008:
I didn't change the key names, so you type :rt028x
and 028X is set.
Oh, and thanks for fixing that.
m.
PS: sf.net mail seems to be broken. Only every other of my mails
seems to get
Another re-send excuse to all, who get this twice.
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Well, was this really the cause that the skilled developers [...] and
a lot more disappeared?
You'll certainly excuse that I won't cite names here. Nevertheless I
can affirm that this applies at least to some members
21 matches
Mail list logo
