[Flightgear-devel] reset crash

Ran into this , thinking I had a problem with the Primus 1000 ... When I try a reset from the menu , I get this error : passed invalid index (0) to FGRouteMgr::jumpToIndex Fatal error: name may contain only ._- and alphanumeric characters Ive been trying to hunt this down , but too tired tonight

[Flightgear-devel] autopilot

Hello ... After the recent autopilot update , altitude hold doesn't work anymore for me , (using pi-simple-controller) Im not sure what effect to expect with the anti-windup addition , but my guess is it's just exposing my poor configuration. Cheers -

[Flightgear-devel] Microsoft C++ exception: FP_Inactive

Hi guys: I ever successfully build and run the flightgear-1.9.1 under WindowsXP by MSVC90. It is a great work and very interesting. Last week I download the source packege of flightgear-2.0.0. Build the source of flightgear is OK, but when step to debug, there is an exception: First-chance except

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Interesting glider model...

On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 19:23 -0700, Gene Buckle wrote: > http://home.att.net/~m--sandlin/bug.htm > > This gent is having some issues getting an accurate flight model for his > gliders in X-Plane. Apparently "cruise" speed is 20kts. Anyone care to > give this a shot? > > g. > I know not of th

[Flightgear-devel] Interesting glider model...

http://home.att.net/~m--sandlin/bug.htm This gent is having some issues getting an accurate flight model for his gliders in X-Plane. Apparently "cruise" speed is 20kts. Anyone care to give this a shot? g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. htt

[Flightgear-devel] Bug report - crash

Just upgraded to the latest CVS (I try to do that). I found a bug that may be difficult to find at random -- the ground.cxx bombed out with the following message: unable to find path to runway threshold in ground.cxx for airport KEMT followed by the dreaded unknown exception in main loop. I'm p

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

I have to agree that much can't be done . I hate to see it removed from the forum , flame war or not , since keeping as much information out there as possible might keep a few some being conned . Cheers -- Download Intel®

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Just sent an email to New Zealand open Source and got this reply, pete Hello Peter, Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Please recognise that the GPL does not in any way preclude people from packaging up and selling a software application *so long as they comply with the terms of the GPL

[Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

This guy sure does waste a lot of time for FG developers to discuss this every few months :-( One thing that has struck me that could be done, is to have a welcome message broadcast to the user on the MP chat when players connect, for example something like... "Welcome to FlightGear Multiplaye

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

That's un-believable, but he's done his research, the license allows you to sell it =/ He obviously did his research and found a loophole. It's a shame that someone would go the great lengths to actually do something as immoral as this. On Mar 15, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote: > Btw:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Btw: Blender has more or less the same problem- and it seems from the design of the webpage, that is the same company. Blender were able to fight against successfully last year. But this year they are back. http://www.blendernation.com/3dmagix-re-branding-and-selling-the-free-software-blender/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

This kind of thing happens sometimes -- not much we can do unless we want to spend tens of thousands of $$ going to court, so there's no point getting stressed. I did go to Google Sidewiki and leave a comment on the page, so that anyone using the Google toolbar or a sidewiki add-on in their browse

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Has anyone tried putting their own watermarks on their models and liveries? I usually put my watermark on the engine, then again, we could put a flightgear watermark on the inside of a model (image mapping the inside of a model so he can't see it) Also, has anyone checked to see if he's a part o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Curtis Olson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Frederic Bouvier > wrote: > > > What will happen if this guy creates a flightgear.flightprosim.com > page ? > > > We could only hope ... !!! > > Can we get in troubl

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

> wrote: > > > > > What will happen if this guy creates a flightgear.flightprosim.com > page ? > We could only hope ... !!! > > > Can we get in trouble ourselves for using his > name? > Curt. -- Yes! And I don't like this idea. It won't help but starts a war, which we maybe can't win.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:04:35 +0100 (CET), Frederic wrote in message <29285847.3999171268669075452.javamail.r...@spooler4-g27.priv.proxad.net>: > > - "Heiko Schulz" a écrit : > > > > Heiko Schulz wrote: > > > > Hey folks, > > > > > > > > you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Frederic Bouvier wrote: > > What will happen if this guy creates a flightgear.flightprosim.com page ? We could only hope ... !!! Can we get in trouble ourselves for using his name? Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

I have noticed that one of the screens on their website uses my alternative summer textures which were partially made using Google Earth images hence they are not GNU-GPL (see my website http://flightgear.xf.cz ). I do not know how many problems I could have with Google corporation doing this f

Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple --generic record/playback errors

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Pete Morgan wrote: > Is it the same as this bug > "Chase-view broken" > http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=99 Yes, it seems so. Cheers, Anders -- --- Anders Gidenstam WWW: http:/

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

- "Martin Spott" a écrit : > Frederic Bouvier wrote: > > > I think the whole thread should be removed by the moderator. I see > no > > point making him advertisement and letting the flames grow up. > > Oh yes, I'm supportive of this procedure, also of installing a > 'flightprosim.flightgear

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Frederic Bouvier wrote: > I think the whole thread should be removed by the moderator. I see no > point making him advertisement and letting the flames grow up. Oh yes, I'm supportive of this procedure, also of installing a 'flightprosim.flightgear.org' page - which could get re-directed to the r

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:50:34 +0100, Erik wrote in message <4b9e655a.9050...@ehofman.com>: > Heiko Schulz wrote: > > That won't stop the fact that he already makes money with our work. > > And yes, I seriously believe that he is able to bring our project > > in danger. > > Making money is one th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Hi, > Fred wrote: > I think the whole thread should be removed by the moderator. I see no point > making > him advertisement and letting the flames grow up. Has been done. Reason: we do not tolerate spam at our forums. No matter if that is some weird non-related software or a paid version o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Heiko Schulz wrote: > That won't stop the fact that he already makes money with our work. > And yes, I seriously believe that he is able to bring our project in danger. Making money is one thing; it's allowed by the GPL. Problem here seems that, while our project tries to do everything to keep i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Heiko Schulz wrote: >> Heiko Schulz wrote: >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a >> new version! Isn't it surprising? >>> Did you know that many of the technologies used in >> FlightGear are the same within FlightProSim? >>> And that this has many improved grap

Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple --generic record/playback errors

Is it the same as this bug "Chase-view broken" http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=99 pete Anders Gidenstam wrote: > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Peter Brown wrote: > > >> As noted by John in February, but I did not see it addressed in this >> thread, is the chase view issue in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Clickbank is an interesting site. See http://www.clickbank.com/help/vendor-help/vendor-basics/selling-basics/what-products-are-allowed/ Perhaps they should be advised that he is selling GPL software which includes material with copyright by many contributors. On the other hand they may encourag

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

> > I did a bit of poking around FPS.com web site and found a > download > link on the disclaimer page (link: > http://www.flightprosim.com/disclaimer/). > The link to the download > file sourcess.zip contains a snapshot of the wiki from > October last > year along with some interesting stuff. >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Heiko Schulz wrote: > >> Heiko Schulz wrote: >> > Hey folks, >> > >> > you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a >> new version! Isn't it surprising? >> > >> > Did you know that many of the technologies used in >> FlightGear are the same within FlightPro

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

One idea which I've used before, would be to create the flightprosim.flightgear.org subdomain. then link sites (eg wiki, 3rd party) to the subdomain. This gets it well up in the rankings and is easy to implement. When end up on that domain is a nice notice explaining what flightprosim. Also th

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

- "Heiko Schulz" a écrit : > > Heiko Schulz wrote: > > > Hey folks, > > > > > > you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a > > new version! Isn't it surprising? > > > > > > Did you know that many of the technologies used in > > FlightGear are the same within FlightProSim? > > > >

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

> Heiko Schulz wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a > new version! Isn't it surprising? > > > > Did you know that many of the technologies used in > FlightGear are the same within FlightProSim? > > > > And that this has many improved graphics as wel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Heiko Schulz wrote: > Hey folks, > > you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a new version! Isn't it > surprising? > > Did you know that many of the technologies used in FlightGear are the same > within FlightProSim? > > And that this has many improved graphics as well as 3D clouds

[Flightgear-devel] News from FlightProSim!

Hey folks, you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a new version! Isn't it surprising? Did you know that many of the technologies used in FlightGear are the same within FlightProSim? And that this has many improved graphics as well as 3D clouds and cool water? And did you know that

Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple --generic record/playback errors

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Peter Brown wrote: > As noted by John in February, but I did not see it addressed in this > thread, is the chase view issue in 2.0. (chase view does not follow > heading, and if you select chase while in a turn the viewpoint holds > that angle until you leave the viewpoint

Re: [Flightgear-devel] multiple --generic record/playback errors

As noted by John in February, but I did not see it addressed in this thread, is the chase view issue in 2.0. (chase view does not follow heading, and if you select chase while in a turn the viewpoint holds that angle until you leave the viewpoint) I sincerely hope it's not a "feature", as ther

Re: [Flightgear-devel] lamp-post appearance depends on camera tilt angle

- "James Sleeman" a écrit : > Could the poster be referring to the pole in the middle distance on > the > right directly above the compass, it changes from "bright whites" into > > "greys, or even transparence". Pretty subtle. > > I have a hard time seeing any difference between the two im

Re: [Flightgear-devel] lamp-post appearance depends on camera tilt angle

Could the poster be referring to the pole in the middle distance on the right directly above the compass, it changes from "bright whites" into "greys, or even transparence". Pretty subtle. > I have a hard time seeing any difference between the two images. > > ---

Re: [Flightgear-devel] lamp-post appearance depends on camera tilt angle

John Denker wrote: > 1) I closed the bug-tracker issue concerning the taxiway > signs. That's all good. > > 2) Alas there are other scenery elements that still > exhibit an improper dependence on camera tilt angle. > > Example: > http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/img48/pole-dark.png > in contrast