Guys, I had made my conclusions. It seems I am leaving.
On my view situation in FG is:
1) Closed upper society have intention to make profit by Flight Gear
finally, maybe have some little profit right now.
2) Intention to include someone else in that society is absented in it
of course.
3) Plans
Am 27.07.2011 11:04, schrieb Durk Talsma:
This one happen also at KNID with 87bd2bf, AFAIK, KNID doesn't have any
ground network. In the meantime I reverted to friday evening FG
(3723de5) and then it was OK again.
I'm currently committing a fix for this problem. As I already suspected, the
On 27 Jul 2011, at 11:54, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Here is another one to chew on: How to I close the ATC Dialog?
It pops up again every time I hit the Cancel button or press Escape.
Great that it works now!
With regard to the dialog, just press the apostrophe (') key again. (Note that
this
Am 27.07.2011 11:58, schrieb Durk Talsma:
On 27 Jul 2011, at 11:54, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Here is another one to chew on: How to I close the ATC Dialog?
It pops up again every time I hit the Cancel button or press Escape.
Great that it works now!
With regard to the dialog, just press the
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 13:17 +0400, Slavutinsky Victor wrote:
Guys, I had made my conclusions. It seems I am leaving.
On my view situation in FG is:
1) Closed upper society have intention to make profit by Flight Gear
finally, maybe have some little profit right now.
2) Intention to
I'm afraid that you wrongly interpret 'being busy doing other things'
with 'unwilling to help'. So far everybody who has made valuable
contributions has been welcomed by everybody. And depending on the time
someone has/is willing to reserver for FlightGear there's always a
chance of getting
Perhaps expecting a flight simulator to be changed overnight to deal with
the problems of orbital flight was rather too optimistic.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Slavutinsky Victor
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 11:48 AM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re:
Perhaps expecting a flight simulator to be changed overnight to deal with
the problems of orbital flight was rather too optimistic.
Problem was not in changing of others, of simulator without me.
Complexity was no one had wanted to explain me how it organized in
inners to help me solve that
Slavutinsky Victor wrote:
Problem was not in changing of others, of simulator without me.
Complexity was no one had wanted to explain me how it organized in
inners to help me solve that tasks personally.
I'm pretty certain you're under-estimating the effort required to
explain the details of
Le 27/07/2011 12:48, Slavutinsky Victor a écrit :
I'm afraid that you wrongly interpret 'being busy doing other things'
with 'unwilling to help'. So far everybody who has made valuable
contributions has been welcomed by everybody. And depending on the time
someone has/is willing to reserver
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 04:04:09 AM Slavutinsky Victor wrote:
Moreover, that explanations not provided not for me only but for anyone.
It's open source but way it open it can not be developed by ones for
whom it seems to be open. That's the real problem what I can not solve,
and, I
Problem was not in changing of others, of simulator without me.
Complexity was no one had wanted to explain me how it organized in
inners to help me solve that tasks personally.
I'm pretty certain you're under-estimating the effort required to
explain the details of how FlightGear works.
I agree there is always a need for more and better documentation and I
certainly agree that FlightGear is under documented. However; it is not
like we have a complete absence of documentation.
There is a ton of information on the wiki. There is a ton of information
included in the documentation
Hi Vitos,
That's sad. Obviously an old project like FG as its own pace, things
here evolve slowly, most of the time those things move in some cahotic
way rather than an effective and straight way as would a strong and
popular project (like a free operating system or a free web server)...
The lack of internal documentation is an issue for many of not most
open source projects. One reason for this is that it is a big
undertaking to completely document a system of the complexity of FG.
For example I just finished (meaning that it is good enough - not
that it is perfect)
FlightGear is never going to have top down authoritarian leadership
like a large corporation might have. This is good in many ways, but
is also creates challenges in many ways. I often see my roll more as
a facilitator for the efforts of developers who are working on their
own priorities
Hi All,
I've got a small patch to improve the FG forests, along with some
particularly bad C++ I need advice on.
The patch does the following:
1) Fixes the longstanding bug where the first set of tree definitions
in a tile were used for all forests within that tile. This meant that
if you have
On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 03:30:06 PM Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a small patch to improve the FG forests, along with some
particularly bad C++ I need advice on.
The patch does the following:
1) Fixes the longstanding bug where the first set of tree definitions
in a tile
18 matches
Mail list logo
