James,
Would fgmeta be an apprporiate spot for this script?
-Pat
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013
14:27:01 -0700 Tom P wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on performance issues reported by cppcheck, I wanted to
> compare performance to a known baseline and came up with this simple
> test bench.
> It's:
> - wr
Hi,
While working on performance issues reported by cppcheck, I wanted to
compare performance to a known baseline and came up with this simple test
bench.
It's:
- written in Python
- uses the telnet interface to FG
- doesn't have other dependencies and
- runs on Linux and Mac (tested) and run on W
> It would need to take in all of the, by now well known, variables -
> making it by no means a simple beast to manage.
>
> If this could be automated in some way it would be much easier to
> capture, and then submit, consistent data.
Let's think this from the end. What would we like to know?
You could use one of the 777's as a heavy aircraft.
Also, what about performance with different views (pilot view vs chase
view), and having the panel open vs. closed in pilot view?
Saikrishna Arcot
On Fri 21 Jun 2013 03:16:36 PM CDT, Christopher Andrews wrote:
> On 22/06/13 02:08, Arnt Karlsen
On 22/06/13 02:08, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:11:39 +1000, Christopher wrote in message
> <51c46d2b.8060...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 21/06/13 21:26, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message
>>> :
>>>
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder
Good checkup,( i do not find the screen format ).
And don't forget, when building OSG to define build type "Release" ,
recently i forgot it, i got a performance dop down of 30 % less.
It took somedays until i discovered my error.
Ahmad
On 21 June 2013 17:11, Christopher Andrews wrote:
>
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:11:39 +1000, Christopher wrote in message
<51c46d2b.8060...@gmail.com>:
> On 21/06/13 21:26, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message
> > :
> >
> >> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote:
> >>
> >>> Instead of all this mudsli
On 21/06/13 21:26, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message
> :
>
>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote:
>>
>>> Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which
>>> processor, could some thought be given to producing a benchmark
>>> su
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message
:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote:
>
> > Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which
> > processor, could some thought be given to producing a benchmark
> > suite for Flightgear.
> >
> > It would need to
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote:
> Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which processor,
> could some thought be given to producing a benchmark suite for Flightgear.
>
> It would need to take in all of the, by now well known, variables - making
> it by no means a simple
Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which processor,
could some thought be given to producing a benchmark suite for Flightgear.
It would need to take in all of the, by now well known, variables - making
it by no means a simple beast to manage.
If this could be automated in
11 matches
Mail list logo
