Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-07-23 Thread Pat
James, Would fgmeta be an apprporiate spot for this script? -Pat On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 14:27:01 -0700 Tom P zomm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, While working on performance issues reported by cppcheck, I wanted to compare performance to a known baseline and came up with this simple test bench.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-22 Thread Renk Thorsten
It would need to take in all of the, by now well known, variables - making it by no means a simple beast to manage. If this could be automated in some way it would be much easier to capture, and then submit, consistent data. Let's think this from the end. What would we like to know? I'm

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message alpine.lfd.2.03.1306201018050.25...@deltasoft.com: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote: Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which processor, could some thought be given to producing a benchmark

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-21 Thread Christopher Andrews
On 21/06/13 21:26, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message alpine.lfd.2.03.1306201018050.25...@deltasoft.com: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote: Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which processor, could some thought be

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-21 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:11:39 +1000, Christopher wrote in message 51c46d2b.8060...@gmail.com: On 21/06/13 21:26, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message alpine.lfd.2.03.1306201018050.25...@deltasoft.com: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-21 Thread grtuxhangar team
Good checkup,( i do not find the screen format ). And don't forget, when building OSG to define build type Release , recently i forgot it, i got a performance dop down of 30 % less. It took somedays until i discovered my error. Ahmad On 21 June 2013 17:11, Christopher Andrews

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-21 Thread Christopher Andrews
On 22/06/13 02:08, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:11:39 +1000, Christopher wrote in message 51c46d2b.8060...@gmail.com: On 21/06/13 21:26, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:20:03 -0700 (PDT), geneb wrote in message alpine.lfd.2.03.1306201018050.25...@deltasoft.com: On

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-21 Thread Saikrishna Arcot
You could use one of the 777's as a heavy aircraft. Also, what about performance with different views (pilot view vs chase view), and having the panel open vs. closed in pilot view? Saikrishna Arcot On Fri 21 Jun 2013 03:16:36 PM CDT, Christopher Andrews wrote: On 22/06/13 02:08, Arnt Karlsen

[Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-20 Thread Alan Teeder
Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which processor, could some thought be given to producing a benchmark suite for Flightgear. It would need to take in all of the, by now well known, variables - making it by no means a simple beast to manage. If this could be automated in

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Benchmark matrix

2013-06-20 Thread geneb
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Alan Teeder wrote: Instead of all this mudslinging about what slows what on which processor, could some thought be given to producing a benchmark suite for Flightgear. It would need to take in all of the, by now well known, variables - making it by no means a simple