On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:24:23 +0100, Durk wrote in message
<200912142224.24136.d.tal...@xs4all.nl>:
> On Monday 14 December 2009 12:11:15 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> >
> > I think one statement can easily be used for both purposes if
> > written appropriately.
>
> Agreed. That's actually what I w
I think if we are deigning to say "Investigation by a number of the FlightGear
developers has found no difference between this and the FlightGear v1.9.1
release other than a change of name."; then I also think that after "Under the
GNU GPL v2 (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html), this is l
On Monday 14 December 2009 12:11:15 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>
> I think one statement can easily be used for both purposes if written
> appropriately.
Agreed. That's actually what I was thinking of.
>
> I'd appreciate feedback, even if it is only to agree with the wording of
> the statement, t
> FlightGear is a open-source flight simulator that was started in 2006.
1996. :)
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes.
http://www.scarlet
On 14 Dec 2009, at 11:11, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I'd appreciate feedback, even if it is only to agree with the wording of the
> statement, to ensure that we have buy-in for this.
>
>
> FlightGear is a open-source flight simulator that was started in 2006. It is
> released under
> the GNU Ge
Durk wrote:
> On Sunday 13 December 2009 10:16:24 pm Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> > A clear statement would
> > a) provide a good reference point for any further discussion outside of the
> > community, rather than various people making different comments.
> >
> > b) be visible enough to Google so
6 matches
Mail list logo
